Joe Kelley
|
"General Joseph Dunford, Jr. is not governing the United States under martial law. The people of the United States, acting through their state legislatures under Article V of their Constitution of 1789, have placed the United States in interregnum; state capture by the Network of Global Corporate Control..." Turn the toggle switch to false: if the idea is to return to rule of law. Karen Hudes is potentially carrying the this truth and liberty torch that was carried before Karen Hudes was born. Example: "Mr. HENRY. Mr. Chairman, it is now confessed that this is a national government. There is not a single federal feature in it. It has been alleged, within these walls, during the debates, to be national and federal, as it suited the arguments of gentlemen. But now, when we have heard the definition of it, it is purely national." That was Patrick Henry blowing the whistle on the false federal government take-over by the nationalists. The 1787/89 (false) Constitution is not rule of law. Rule of law, or due process, is the common law, trial by the country, or trial by jury. If the idea is to return to rule of law by working backwards to the time and place when the nationalists took over, when they made slavery legal for slave masters, then a current TRUE whistle blower would at least acknowledge the facts that prove that the Constitution of 1787/89 is as bad, or worse, than so called Martial Law. If it is "secret" Martial Law, then it is nothing but fraud, on a federal level, or fraud upon fraud with super secret martial law piled on top of a false federal government. When the criminals take over, they often shoot the messengers, like Martin Luther King Jr., and in that case trial by jury, despite jury tampering, worked, as trial by the country, to expose the facts in that case. No claims of "conspiracy theory" can stand as legitimate when that case was tried lawfully, with due process, where facts, not fiction, rule. So...what is so difficult about this specific fiction whereby so many people refuse, against painfully obvious inculpatory evidence providing the fcts, why do so many people refuse to acknowledge the facts here, just like Karen Hudes refusing to do so.
|
