Joe Kelley
|
Substance: " Was the Constitution of 1789 replaced in 1871 by a second, secret Constitution? Is the US Congress declaring a state of emergency behind closed doors, using war powers against the people, taking their property, and refusing them access to the courts guaranteed under Article III of the Constitution of 1789?" You Karen continue to cover-up the serious flaw in your claims of authority over the substance/facts/truth and therefore true authority about the law of the land in America. Sure, yes, affirmative, the criminals who operate the false federal government no longer abide by their 1789 Constitution, nor do they abide by their Article III courts, as they (because they are criminals) abide by criminal authority acquired, and maintained, by criminal means. The true authority is factual acknowledgment of the facts, through due process, which is still on the official record in the Bill of Rights in America. So...the trial of Martin Luther King Jr,, exemplifies this human run, human process, by which human beings volunteer to defend each other from criminals who take over governments and it was determined (case law) in that trial that "our" government is guilty of conspiracy murder. Sure, Karen, it is a very good idea to use the criminal constitution to return to the criminal rule established in 1787/89 instead of the criminal rule called Martial Law, sure, that is a good idea to expose that Martial Law fraud. Sure, it is a good idea to account for the crimes now perpetrated by those people in the Network of Global Corporate Control, and sure it is a good idea to offer those criminals a means by which those criminals can return back to lawful social interaction through applications of true law: redemption and restitution NOT punishment. So... you are dead wrong with this idea of falsely claiming that the Constitution of 1787/89 is the way to avoid punishing those Network of Global Corporate Control criminals, allowing them to help bring about the Global Currency Reset. The common law (genuine not counterfeit) is trial by the country, so as to remove trial by criminal means, and typically the so called punishment is a fine, as demonstrated in the Martin Luther King Jr. case, which stands as an example of what is supposed to happen in trial by jury according to the common law. Choosing to throw people into the meat grinder ("extraordinary rendition, and enhanced interrogation techniques") is that choice you are making to give (false) authority back to the (false) Constitution of 1789, that Judiciary Act of 1789, and those so called Article III courts.
|
