 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/dctvteleprompt5.3.pdf
Here:
https://www.facebook.com/karen.hudes.10/?fref=nf
Substance: " In the comments section of my YouTube channel, where I archive these DCTV programs, there is an ongoing debate about whether or not to jail the bankers. If we insist on jailing the bankers, we can kiss humanity good-bye. It is as simple as that." On that YouTube Channel, on the side of true rule of law, are messengers delivering the facts about true rule of law, where jail is not a solution, where remedy, restitution, and redemption is a solution, or a fine. Those messages AGAINST jailing are CENSORED on that YouTube Channel, so...where is the on-going debate when the only side debating is the wrong side?
Substance: "That is an actor who tries to create chaos and disorder by pretending that they are working to fix things when they are really working to destroy things. I have been exposing provocateurs." In true rule of law facts are found through due process. Due process applies to everyone, not an exclusive sub-set of "elite" people. That means that anyone, such as a BLM agent caught red handed perpetrating the crime of arson, where the target of the arson is the Hammond family. Said BLM agent is accused in true rule of law, just like anyone else who may be accused of wrongdoing, and said accusation is validated by the same due process due everyone else. In rule of law, typically, those who end up factually guilty (found guilty through trial by the country) are offered (voluntarily) to pay a fine. The fine is not meant to "punish" it is meant to restore, redeem, and reinstate the guilty OUTLAW back into the sanctuary of mutual, moral, voluntary, defensive law powers. This is the information that is being censored by the agent provocateurs. Without true rule of law everyone is subjected to rule by criminal means, including the agent provocateurs, the so called "elite," and anyone who produces anything worth stealing. True rule of law deters as crime no longer pays well. Had the BLM agent been indicted properly, for the charge of arson, the next step would be to indict whoever ordered that BLM agent to perpetrate that case of arson. True rule of law is the process of blowing the whistle, naming the outlaws, naming their victims, and offering those found guilty (through trial by the country) a moral means by which those convicted are offered a way to return to the sanctuary of rule of law. If they refuse, if anyone refuses to return to rule of law, then by your own power of will (not coerced by fraud or aggressive violence) you choose to be outside the true moral law, and you are then, by your own choice, suffering anything done to you by another fellow outlaw, because you are thereby, by your own choice, ruled by criminal means.