 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
My comments on that page above are here:
In simple term these criminals (fraud at a minimum) in what is identified by many ways, and in what is identified by many names, such as the Power Transition Model, and the Network of Global Corporate Control need people who are the targets of these crimes that include at least fraud. So...when there is an argument over who has jurisdiction over wealth that argument is an argument over who has access to the people who are the targets of these crimes. Yes, if there is a lot of gold, silver, and other wealth, that is good for humanity if that gold, silver, and other wealth works as a global standard of stored value (money in vaults) and a global standard of currency such as arum. The real battle is over the minds of the targeted people who constitute the actual wealth of humankind. If all the people all over the world regain their jurisdiction to live freely in liberty by volunteering to defend each other with common laws shared by all the worlds people, such as the common law of willfully deciding not to perpetrate fraud (at least) upon each other, then that concept of rule of law returns, and jurisdiction returns to the people themselves. That was the American Revolutionary promise to mankind, which was to expose (at that time) The British version of the Network of Global Corporate Control, and the exposing of that criminal organization (The British) at that time was published as the first federal American document known as a Declaration of Independence. Who but the people of America had jurisdiction then, during the publication of the Declaration of Independence? Did you know that Tomas Jefferson, in the original Declaration of Independence, condemned African Slavery as a crime against "nature itself" in the Declaration of Independence, and Thomas Jefferson explains, in the Congressional Record of the first American federation, who censored (cut out) that indictment against African Slavery. Why are those who fight over jurisdiction OVER the people of America censoring this vital information concerning the facts on the record concerning which criminals were responsible for taking over the American federation of free people in Liberty, by taking over their common law jurisdiction of the people, by the people, and for the people? Do you know the meaning of the term conflict of interest?
My comments above are not published on that web page when I am not signed into the Google/YouTube system. That is a demonstrable form of censorship.