 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I was in National Liberty Alliance for one year. The claims made about Controlled Opposition only go as far as the claims made concerning who has the power to indict (charge with a crime) and who then has the power to enforce that charge. It makes absolutely no sense to construct Controlled Opposition that gives that power to the opposition. The same thing applies to this Global Currency Reset claim of Controlled Opposition. If those in command of criminal power (fraud or counterfeit "legal" money scams, extortion or false federal tax known as National Interest or National Debt, torture or cruel and usual punishment, slavery or human trafficking, murder or lone gunmen, and mass murder or war of aggression and false flag terrorist attacks) - if those in command of criminal power - give away their power over money and their power over rule of law, as is the case with the Global Currency Reset and National Liberty Alliance/Oath Keepers/etc., receiving this power from the criminal organizations at the "top," and those who receive this "controlled opposition" power use that power to return to common law (see Bill of Rights), and return to free market competition in money markets (no legal tender laws) then it is game over for those criminals as they give away their power. They then have no way to finance their criminal organizations, and they have no way to enforce them. Who takes the power once it is given away? Please consider the possibility that is it past time to dictate your viewpoint, expecting people to believe your viewpoint is true beyond question, and consider instead the idea that reasonable, moral, logical, discussion concerning the facts may work toward mutual defense of everyone and a means to pay for it.