 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
The pot calling the kettle black is at work once again. Rather than finding agreement in voluntary cooperation to hold the guilty to account for their injuries done to innocent victims, both sides are pots calling kettles black. That is classic divide and conquer evidence and therefore a need to offer an olive branch, or take each other's temperature, or agree to find a common cause. If the common cause is vengeance, punishment, revenge, including a desire for cruel and unusual punishment, then who (which color, which temperature) is that form of lawful, voluntary, agreement? How can vengeance, revenge, getting even, settling the score, punishment, involve anyone accused of any wrong doing, when said desire for vengeance, revenge, etc., must assume that that accused is guilty, beyond reasonable doubt, by some method, process, routine, thoughtful, reasonable, moral, action of some kind, in some place? If the desire for revenge is inspired by this willful, agreeable, voluntary, processes of determining guilt, beyond reasonable doubt, then who shares, voluntarily, this desire for revenge, and among those sharing this desire for revenge are there any, in that number, in that vengeful group, themselves guilty, and themselves generating more, and more, and more desire for more, and more, revenge, punishment, violence, as a result of their own guilt among them in that group whose desire is vengeance?
If the goal is rule of law, accurate currency, accurate accounting, accurate knowledge, accurate wisdom, then the common denominator is called the truth, or the accurate account of what is, and what is not factual. If Karen Hudes claims that the leadership at National Liberty Alliance is guilty of failing to acknowledge the fact that the federal government is a fraud, then she is by that color, by that temperature, black like the pot, where she claims that the National Liberty Alliance leadership is black like the kettle. That is factual because Karen Hudes claims that the 1789 Constitution (not the Bill of Rights per se), with Article V (so called) courts, and an Article V (so called) convention, is not black itself. In other words Karen Hudes is guilty of doing the same thing Karen Hudes claims that National Liberty Alliance (leadership) is guilty of doing; which is failing to disclose the vital facts that matter, if the idea is to volunteer, join, participate in, become, moralize, defend, produce, maintain, rule of law, accurate currency (Global Currency Reset), where the guilty are no longer paid so well for their injuries done to the innocent among us. The Constitution of 1787/89 is the document (not the Bill of Rights) that inculpates the Network of Global Corporate Control for their crimes against nature itself, as that document "legalized" slavery, among other less obvious crimes. So the olive branch is to agree that A. The criminals are knowable by name. B. Accurate accounting deters (takes the pay, and therefore the power from) those criminals named in a process that accurately identifies those criminals. C. We will be inspired to fight among ourselves because we are also threatened with cruel and unusual punishment if we fail to find the first two agreements by some agreeable process that is NOT "legal" vengeance.
In other words; if we are inspired by the false form of rule of law (such as the Constitution of 1787/89 where slavery was made "legal" by the slave traders), whereby the idea is to pay a premium to those who offer a method that accomplishes the goal of vengeance, then we will get vengeance at a high price. If, on the other hand, we agree to actually find, and agree upon, the actual accurate account, which accurately accounts for the actual process knowable as rule of law, then we may find, once again, what is the law of the land, which is the process that calls upon moral people to volunteer as individual representatives of the whole local group of defenders, whereby their moral conscience is their guiding power, in courts of conscience, where trial by jury is trial by the country, and no one, meaning no, where no means no, and one means one, and no one is harmed without unanimity, and any one, meaning any one, can stop the innocent from being harmed by anyone, or any group out for vengeance.