| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Mar 30th, 2016 11:17 am |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
+Karen Hudes, I was National Liberty Alliance California State Coordinator for one year. I was asked to censor myself, as the accusations against me was that the information I bring to the table discourages people and closes the gate for people joining and participating in returning to Rule of Law through National Liberty Alliance. I took the requtest to censor myself as a demand for me to leave. If people don't want accurate accounts, the truth if you will, then they won't see it no matter what the source. If people at National Liberty Alliance are moving toward individual responsibility at local levels, despite those who may or may not be effective gatekeepers in the alliance, then which side are those people on as they move, step, by step, toward individual responsibility at local levels? Had those people, at the National Liberty Alliance, listened to the accurate accounts offered to them, they might have taken a different course 2 years ago, but that does not mean that specific people within the alliance did not get something out of the accurate accounts offeed to them, so that their individual paths were not fully turned in a wrong, wasteful, or worse, direction. How will people find, and then employ, the tool known as Rule of law if there are no accurate accounts of it? Without accurate accounts of what is, or is not, true, accurate (based upon facts), Rule of Law, then are people demanding something that they have to invent from scratch? Moving step by step past interregnum, the idea is to move from a single control by criminal means (Network of Global Corporate Control) to individual responsibility and individual accounablily at local levels; which ends up with indiviudals looking in the mirror and making the right decisions instead of individuals being led down the wrong path. Where once there was (criminally led) Dollar (Federal Reserve note, not actual U.S. dollar) Hegemony, or World Reserve Currency (Federal Reserve as world reserve currency controller), so where once there was Dollar Hegemony, there is now the first step from single, dictatorial, criminal, control, from monopoly Dollar Hegemony toward 2 market competitors when adding the currency issue of BRICS. No longer is there a single criminal monopoly power, said Dollar Hegemony, as now there is a greater power known as BRICS. Out with criminal power, and in with individual responsibility on the individual local level with BRICS? The answer is clearly no. To finish the job the next step, as information offered by you suggests, is individual Nation State currencies, and that is already happening with such Nation States as Nevada and Arizona moving to gold backed currencies. Your information, as far as I know, includes the very good idea of working the United States on a Federal Level (not national level) whereby those who have (fraudulent) Federal Reserve Notes in their accounts are inspired to choose to peacefully transition first to U.S. Treasury notes, on par (or at the current exchange rate of 1 to 1), so as then to freeze the value (which is plummeting toward less than zero) of that Federal (not national) currency issue in these United States, so as then to be able to manage an exchange rate from Treasury Notes to Aurum, for those engaged in International Trade. At the same time a change from Rule by Criminal means (an example of rule by criminal means is the French Revolution turning into a pogrom) to the better, accurate accounting, Rule of Law actually helps the financial moves from false to true accounting. How are you going to inspire people to move toward Rule of Law (individual responsibility at the local level) and how are you, or how is anyone, going to inspire people to move away from institutionalized (legalized) crime by criminal means (injustice in the counterfeit courts) if there is no accurate information by which people can actually see how Rule of Law actually works? National Liberty Alliance was, is, and can be a stepping stone in that direction from Rule by Criminal Means, to Rule of Law, but there must be accurate accounting on an individual responsibility level locally, if that is going to happen. If coalitions form, then what will those coalitions look like in their formative states? What will the counterfeit coalitions look like in their formative states? It might be a good idea for individuals to take the responsibility of rolling up their sleaves, and start discussing these vital topics, in local groups, sooner, rather than later, yes, no, maybe? Anyone? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhgTYrQYmUM
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||