 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
This news is not a blow to the Network of Global Corporate Control. They are trying to crash the system. But it is not going to crash, because people know that the coalition for the rule of law on the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF is in charge, and is embarking on a Global Currency Reset." My comment: If no one is in charge of defending against collapse, currency war, world war, and a new global dark ages, then we - like it or not - the people will get what we are paying for, through fraud, extortion, under the color of law (treason), we the people pay for, with our stolen earnings, and are stolen defensive investments. So the idea that someone, some where, or some group, some how, is, in demonstrable fact, working for our voluntary, mutual, defense, is what it is to whoever connects to this information in time and place. So what is the knee jerk reaction to this information from a viewpoint that is ignorant, or even willfully ignorant? The knee jerk reaction might be such that those people claiming to be "in charge" are the bad guys: more wolves in sheeps clothing? I think that is actually funny, like comic relief. A very nice, courageous individual, takes on the powers that be, like David and Goliath, fighting against world war III investors, and that individual - knees jerking - looks like the enemy? Enemy of what? Those who are investing in World War III, through ignorance, may want to stop jerking their knees on cue, like Pavlov's Dogs, and those who are willfully ignorant about their investments in "winning" world war III, are the enemy, so what does their opinion matter?