 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Belief in Criminals as the authorities of moral right and moral wrong, which is the time period that ended just recently. Next is the time period called interregnum, which is acknowledgment of the false belief in criminal authority, and the acknowledgment of the need to return to the revolutionary idea of Rule of Law, and that time is now, and in the near future (with predicted 90% certainty) there will be, by our moral industry, a time when Rule of Law returns as a voluntary mutual defense investment of our time, effort, and power.
That is a pattern.
The same pattern plays out with the Global Currency Reset, as false belief in counterfeit money, or false belief - without question - in the legitimacy of the Federal Reserve Extortoin Racket (which includes the IRS part of that scam), ends by design, as the criminlas implode their own counterfeit money, and as with the false belief in criminals as the authorities of moral right, that time ends and a new time begins, and the new time beginning is the formation of replacement currencies, which include Pay Pay, Bitcoin, Local Currencies, States returning to Gold standard currencies, and an offer to return counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes in exchange for Treasury Notes, during the interregnum time period, which is before the time period when Rule of Law returns in general use. The patern is then established as 3 parts in 2 areas. Area 1 is out with criminal Rule, followed by interregnum, followed by Rule of Law. Area 2 is financial, out with counterfeit (fraudulent) Federal Reserve Notes, in with interregnum currencies called Treasury Notes, and finally a return to Rule of Law where local currencies, no false "legal tender laws," which impair competition, and a return to accurate money/currency (serving as storage and transfer medium) in the form of actual gold aurum.
What then, if you follow these patterns, and you understand the significance of the current realities, what is the form by which Rule of Law takes, after the interregnum, and what is a true President of a true Federation as was the actual Revolutionary example offered by American history between 1776 and 1787? The true president is merely a member of congress, elected by congress as the president of congress, and the powers of the president are limited by the representatives elected as governors, and congressmen, in independent (competitive) states. There is no direct control over the people in the states given to (or taken fraudulently by) a President of a Consolidated Nation State. The only direct control people in the states have of who is the president, or what the president does, is similarly limited. Just as the president has no direct control over the business of the people in each independent state, those people in those states have no business, and no control, over the president of a true federal congress. If people want to control their country, their nation, their elected representative of their state, they are limited within the jurisdiction of their state, which is in most cases a governor, and a congress of their state, which is a republic in form, and which works democratically, which are principles of the true common law; where all things are voluntary and all things are for all the people and all things work for mutual defense of all, and there is no one believed (falsely) to be above the law, as such a (false) claim constitutes, as inculpatory evidence, a confession of a criminal mind, with or without malice aforethought, whenever someone enforces their power to injury innocent people with impunity.
So it can be seen, as it is perceptible that Treasure Notes offer a brief period of adjustment in values and principles, leading toward local currencies and global aurum, that a return to the (fraudulent) Constitution of 1787, where a dictator is claimed to be above the law, having false legal power to gain direct access to everyone's natural wealth, is but a momentary, brief, period of adjustment, before the facts are found, and before an accurate accounting follows the due course of true law, and ultimately the many countries of people (independent states) reform the original voluntary mutual defense association, or federation, whereby the federal congress elects their president of the federal congress. If people want a dictator in their independent state, then they can find one of the independent states that works more like a dictatorship, and those who prefer freedom in liberty can find sanctuary in independent states where the people prefer freedom in liberty instead of dictatorship. Let the people decide which type of free market government they want to inveset into, and let those chips fall as they may, which was the revolutionary idea called Rule of Law.
That is explained here: http://www.amazon.com/Reclaiming-American-Revolution-Kentucky-Resolutions/dp/1403963037/ref=pd_sxp_redirect
Quote:________________
Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government, the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely.
Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.
_____________________________________________