 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Facebook comments:
Time 5:31 is a reference to Article 3 Courts. Does anyone know the meaning of the Br'er Fox and the Tar Baby fable? Before the criminals took over America the concept of a federal court was strictly limited to dealing only with disputes between states, there was no direct power taken (by the criminals) over the people of America. At that time any accusation against anyone, with any pretense of authority, was valid and validated according to the true meaning of Rule of Law. Written right into the first American Federal Constitution were words addressing this liability (due process applies to all, or it isn't due process) charged to federal congressmen, including the president of the American federal congress. When the criminals took over in 1787 through 1789 they created a Tar Baby in the form of the current Article 3 courts, which then opened the door for the Judicary Act of 1789, which as enforced before the Bill of Rights supposedly amended the fraudulent 1789 "Constitution," so Karen Hudes may be accurately offering information concerning the fact that the current (false) Federal Judges are not following their own rules that they claim as their source of authority, which is a crime known as treason, but the unreported whole truth is that even if they did follow their (false) federal rules, they would still be guilty of treason if the truth means anything to anyone. Place those treasonous criminals back into power in their Article 3 Courts and you return the people of America back to the moment we are thrown into the tar pit; without our means to get out, which is the true rule of law, which was then understood as trial by jury according to the common law; which remains on the official record in the Bill of Rights. Why would you choose to jump back into the tar pit, stick yourself back into the tar baby, if you actually do find the power to remove yourself from that Network of Corporate Global Control? See: http://www.power-independence.com/forum/view_topic.php?id=1191&forum_id=2
I think the accurate (whole truth) answer to this question concerning who is in control of the global assets is every moral person on this planet. What has happened to people during the brain washing, mind control, that has been going on for thousands of years, is the bait and switch job (parlor trick) done to the concept of ownership. The original meaning of ownership has to do with individual responsibility or the meaning still contained (generally) in the word stewardship. Now the meaning of ownership has a criminal connotation to it, whereby an "owner" is akin to someone who criminally gains control of other people (slave owner) and said "owner" can criminally do whatever he, or she, pleases with the people owned by the "owner." So the answer to this question from a bent mind (where the brain is washed and is infected with criminal thoughts) is an answer that offers a name of a criminal who "owns" (has criminal power over) everyone: he, or she, or their little cabal, "owns" (has control of) the global assets. To understand why the real answer is every moral person on this planet, you must start thinking in terms of individual responsibility, stewardship, and the limits placed, voluntarily, by moral people on ourselves. This is why Karen is right about what must be done with the worst criminals currently perpetrating the worst crimes under the color of law: they must be offered remedy, redemption, restitution, rehabilitation, and if they refuse, then their own kind (criminals) will have free access to them, as these rats act like rats on a siking ship, and they throw each other under the bus, and moral people, true moral people, choose not to participate in such pogroms: reference to the ill fated French Revolution is a shinning example.