| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Mar 10th, 2016 06:31 pm |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
There is a need to create awe in the minds of the clique members and their minions. I'm not letting go of true rule of law (voluntary mutual defense association), and the above looks like "shock and awe" which is part and parcel to what can be understood as criminal rule, or despotism, or crime under the color of law, or tyranny, or might makes "right," or any other label that accurate accounts for (indicts - as in declaration of independents) the criminals for their crimes which include treason and breach of the peace, and the accused, if found guilty, are offered remedy, restitution, and redemption. Why use the criminal methods of shock and awe created by inventing a false, misleading, fictional, trial? Why not learn from history as to the right way to effectively deter crime with examples of offering the criminals their just accounting process? Step by step: Elect justices of the peace in each county, of the people, by the people, and for the people. These justices have jurisdiction both criminal and civil, in their county, and they are called upon to validate all accusations by any accuser accusing anyone, and most importantly anyone accused of treason, disturbing the peace, under the color of law, which is the necessity created by criminals perpetrating crimes under the color of law, whereby voluntary defenders of the public liberty volunteer to be justices of the peace, and they constitute grand jurors, who represent the accuser, validating the accusation, creating a lawful, valid, presentment, which is then transferred to the existing county government, which would be the county sheriff, in cases where a county judge is normally authorized to handle the presentment, and it is the judge who is accused of aiding, abetting, lending moral support to, and lending material support to the enemies, foreign and domestic, of the public liberty. The sheriff has - by the true meaning of posse comitatus - jurisdiction over any military force of any kind within the county, including militia, including Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard, State Police, City Police, and of course the office held by the County Sheriff, in any case where the offer offered to the accused (presumed to be innocent) is rejected by the accused, whereby said rejection constitutes a willful, premeditated, decision, by the accused, to reject rule of law, and the Sheriff, with said posse, arrests, and holds, outlaw for trial by jury according to the common law. What? No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation. No person inside the law has any reason to reject an offer to clear their name when rule of law is the law of the land, where common law trial by jury is the only way to establish a lawful fact that sets in motion any government action against any person under rule of law. When the criminals take over, and when assassination (murder) is the result of merely speaking out against the criminal government, there is no Rule of Law. People are "arrested" (kidnapped) routinely, as a matter of due course when criminals take over voluntary government. When rule of law in in force then my accusation, whatever it may be, including a accusation I may make against a congressman in my county, which is a federal district, is (as a matter of due course) validated (if it is valid) by the grand jury in my district. What happens if the grand jury in my district hasn't even been formed by the people in my district? The answer is abundantly clear is it not? The only accusations that are validated, in the absence of rule of law, in the absence of justices of the peace in every county in the former federation, are accusations that serve the purposes of the criminals who took over the true government.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||