 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
All those sort of blatant violations of the U.S. Constitution are going to backfire and just help you get the American public, and the rank and file of the police and the U.S. military focused on what is actually going on. It should be noted that as your activities unfold, it will become evident that certain high ranking police officials and high ranking officers of the U.S. military will begin to stand out and will then become “persons of interest” in your investigations and symbolic trials, which will start to identify the clique minions among them and will create a further groundswell of support from the police and military, based on their sworn oaths to support and defend the U.S. Constitution.
They are sworn to defend a fraud? What does that make them? Forget about the Bill of Rights? Is that what this Grandfather is actually supposing to be the "law of the land" and instead of acknowledging common law trial by jury due process, due everyone without exception, including congressmen who may be guilty of treason and disturbing the peace, including the president of congress, instead of acknowledging the true law of the land, this Grandfather is baited and switched to "defend" an ongoing fraud?
If the idea is to defend rule of law, a non-dictatorial, non-tyrannical, process due everyone, including congressmen, and including presidents of a federal congress, and including state governors, and including sheriffs of counties, whereby through posse comitatus said sheriff in said county can command any military force necessary in defense of rule of law in said county, to arrest, a treasonous congressman, if the accusation passes the careful judgment of the county justices of the peace, whereby a presentment validating the accusation offers the accused their trial by jury in their defense, if that is the idea, then that idea has absolutely nothing to do with the slave trader deal known as the Constitution of 1789, other than the Bill of Right which have been, are, and will be ignored by those "defending" the slave trading document know as the Constitution of 1789.
The Judicary Act of 1789 was passed under the color of law before the Bill of Rights, by the slave traders who took over the voluntary federation, turning the voluntary federation into a dictatorship.
Is that what is being defending in point of fact when people offer their Oath to defend said fraud?
Those "oath keepers" mean well, because they think they are defending the law of the land, they think they are defending rule of law, they think they are defending the Bill of Rights, they think they are defending a process exemplified in a Declaration of Independence, yet they are fooled by a wicked parlor trick into defending a known fraud?
The same known fraud used by numbers of frauds beginning with George Washington and his Executive Order to invade Pennsilvania to enforce the collection of extortion payments in his Whiskey Rebellion Proclimation?
The same known fraud used by numbers of frauds including the traitor John Adams who reinstated the British Admiratly Summary Justice debt collection oragans, and suppression of truth, with so called Alien and Sedition Acts?
The same known fraud used by numbers of frauds including the traitor Alexander Hamilton whose counterfeit National Debt scheme franchised the previous British criminal fraudulent National British Debt Collection Agency?
Take the oath and become anoher willing, ableit misdirected, obedient enforcer of color of law hidden behind a thin and thinning false claim of voluntary mutual defense association, knowable as federation, knowable a rule of law, knowable as the law of the land, knowable as due process for all the people all the time?
Parlor tricks that are easy to see but not so easy to render powerless?