 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I have cut and pasted my correspondence to you (not your correspondence to me) on Facebook and onto my own web page already. My assumption (based upon your consistent statements) is that whistleblowing (facts) is good, not secrecy.
Again this is entropy versus ectropy.
Well said here:
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1970/solzhenitsyn-lecture.html
"And on top of this we are threatened by destruction in the fact that the physically compressed, strained world is not allowed to blend spiritually; the molecules of knowledge and sympathy are not allowed to jump over from one half to the other. This presents a rampant danger: THE SUPPRESSION OF INFORMATION between the parts of the planet. Contemporary science knows that suppression of information leads to entropy and total destruction. Suppression of information renders international signatures and agreements illusory; within a muffled zone it costs nothing to reinterpret any agreement, even simpler - to forget it, as though it had never really existed. (Orwell understood this supremely.) A muffled zone is, as it were, populated not by inhabitants of the Earth, but by an expeditionary corps from Mars; the people know nothing intelligent about the rest of the Earth and are prepared to go and trample it down in the holy conviction that they come as "liberators"."
In order for people to agree, voluntarily, to exchange counterfeit information (money, law, news, language) for accurate information, they must first get rid of their own willful ignorance. That can be done by example, after example, after example, of the cost they face themselves, for their complacency, their "trading with the enemy," and please feel free to post anything, with my name on it, that I transfer to you voluntarily. I am my own power in command of my own conscience, and that, like yourself, provides said examples.
Another example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTm3Jbr6ePQ
People must start looking in the mirror, try their own conscience on their own volition, and when that trial is won, then another individual will begin to help everyone else with these processes of re-instating the good as the bad destroys itself. When people are then polarized in this direction the choice to use accurate local money, at the local government level, or at the individual consumer level, will be an obvious choice for better instead of worse, for accurate information instead of willfully following criminal orders without question.
No more of this:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html
"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. "
A return to this:
https://jeffersonpapers.princeton.edu/selected-documents/jefferson%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Coriginal-rough-draught%E2%80%9D-declaration-independence-0
"he has waged cruel war against human nature itself,..."
Meaning, get rid of the lies, double talk, and counterfeit information carried around in our minds, schools, governments, and wallets, and start holding each other to an accurate accounting, and there is no need to reinvent the wheel, just use the principle (accurate accounting is ROUND) to construct a modern wheel with modern technology.
I can show you in the Congressional record where the criminal infiltrators where covered up as the criminal infiltrators stole the American wheel (accurate accounting), and that is where we can find examples worth exemplifying now.
Out with this:
"The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others."
In with this:
http://www.thekingcenter.org/sites/default/files/KING%20FAMILY%20TRIAL%20TRANSCRIPT.pdf
Arthur Jackson Haynes, Jr
James M. Lawson, Jr
Page 541
"The movement was aimed at reversing that. King's motto was, the SCLC motto, it was not civil rights, it was redeem the soul of America. That was our motto. So you see right away that that is much larger than getting a hamburger at a lunch counter."
Page 804
“I have considered in my thirty-five-year career a jury is the best lie detector there is.”
Page 1582
William Schaap
“Because when year, after year, after year you hear that something was the case, one story -- one day saying, hey, the whole thing was a lie, and it doesn't register on their brain.”
Page 1614
“Q. (BY MR. PEPPER) Mr. Schaap, you've described an awesome power that exists in government influenced and controlled, sometimes owned, media -- print, audio, visual media entities -- and how that infrastructure gets focused on opponents of the United States such as Martin Luther King.”
[Defenders of the innocent are not opponents of the many (50 or so) Republics which are united into a voluntary federation, the Legal Fiction known as U.S. Inc., is a false front, so people who are opposed to frauds are opponents of frauds, not opponents of the false word]
Page 1632
A. Oh, but -- as we know, silence can be deafening. Disinformation is not only getting certain things to appear in print, it's also getting certain things not to appear in print. I mean, the first -- the first thing I would say as a way of explanation is the incredibly powerful effect of disinformation over a long period of time that I mentioned before. For 30 years the official line has been that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King and he did it all by himself. That's 30 years, not -- nothing like the short period when the line was that the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for 30 years it's James Earl Ray killed Dr. King, did it all by himself.
And when that is imprinted in the minds of the general public for 30 years, if somebody stood up and confessed and said: I did it. Ray didn't do it, I did it. Here's a movie. Here's a video showing me do it. 99 percent of the people wouldn't believe him because it just -- it just wouldn't click in the mind. It would just go right to -- it couldn't be. It's just a powerful psychological effect over 30 years of disinformation that's been imprinted on the brains of the -- the public. Something to the country couldn't -- couldn't be.
I ran for congress in my district in 1996 telling voters how the criminal government tortured and murdered innocent people in a church in WACO. I think I know the stakes. Your call.
Joe