View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Fri Oct 16th, 2015 01:57 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 "This unfortunate difference of colour, and perhaps of faculty, is a powerful obstacle to the emancipation of these people. Many of their advocates, while they wish to vindicate the liberty of human nature, are anxious also to preserve its dignity and beauty. Some of these, embarrassed by the question `What further is to be done with them?' join themselves in opposition with those who are actuated by sordid avarice only. Among the Romans emancipation required but one effort. The slave, when made free, might mix with, without staining the blood of his master. But with us a second is necessary, unknown to history. When freed, he is to be removed beyond the reach of mixture."

http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hyper/JEFFERSON/ch14.html

The above is offered to a candid world. If there is no such thing as a candid world, then who is to blame for that error in judgment?

There was an effort to end slavery, to say otherwise is to speak falsely. It is as accurate to acknowledge that there was - uncontroversial - an effort to gain at the expense of slaves, and to institutionalize that type of heinous criminality.


From Facebook Topic on 5G my comments

All polluters allowed to continue indicates the absence of due process of law, not credit accrediting the willfully fraudulent, such as evidence proving culpability beyond reasonable doubt, refusing to even acknowledge that the matter even exists, or ever has existed, or ever will exist, accurate efforts to determine the precise line between fact and fiction.

I just discovered, by routine accident seeking, a very interesting old English word:

Outlawry

Here is my find:

“outlawry, act of putting a person beyond the protection of the law for his refusal to become amenable to the court having legal jurisdiction. ... Under English law outlawry can now be invoked only for one accused of criminal charges.”
Google Search result for: outlawry

Polluting the body known as The people with a false narrative as to what is or is not the law, as those making that claim are busy disregarding the rules that they say are their rules giving them authority to do precisely opposite what they are in fact doing – polluting society – so often proving the self-evident fact of a Treasonous Fraud Guilty of Polluting the very source of the Treasonous Frauds Counterfeit Authority, which irrefutably is: Treasonous Fraud.

Do you see it?

In common law an out-law is someone volunteering to step outside the natural laws governing human beings. If any one of The People are deceiving so as to profit from other people, that one proves his guilt in the act of performing the crime known as fraud, which would be that guilty one doing to another that which he himself would defend against were others to dare to do the same to them.

We, in common law, are on the Golden Rule, or Natural Law, path to defend each other from frauds.

The Golden Rule side, or The Natural Law side, is the moral side as tested with a moral experiment such as an attempt to deceive someone else for the purposes of disarming someone else for the purpose of consuming someone else, by some accurate measure, including the burning of calories. That may sound absurd to those preferring not to look, but to those who are looking the next layer up the Treasonous Fraud Pyramid is more hidden and more evil. That fact that matters ought to suggest a need to at least look for possible existence of an evil, cooperative, force larger than one individual alone in the deepest, darkest, web of deception, seeking that muffled warning shot, the enemies of life are near and approaching.

One might be deceived into mistaking Conspiracy Theory with Reasonable Doubt.

IDW response on Polish House of Representatives v Mr. Global presented by Reiner Füllmich, my comments follow:
Looking good so far, which is far from actual law as proven by delays put in place for the purpose of delaying due process of law, which is itself a confession if actual law is moral, to delay the process merely for the purpose of delaying it, and despite evidence suggesting that further delay - as a rule - constitutes injustice by default.
Self-evidently, one imposing rules that one does not himself follow, is a confession of distrust, found in the disagreement between law and un-law, or between law and outlawry, one is based upon facts and the other counterfeits facts with false narratives.
Not yet knowing what exactly is behind the Curtain hiding the Wizard of Oz, the closer it is to the Top of either Law or Outlawry, is either much better or much worse for the divisions caused by those choosing self-evident deception.
Reiner dares to move one more level above the lower level in The Pyramid Scheme, the self-confessing deceivers employing Treasonous Fraud in fact.
Rule by deception is not a new thing for those who know it for what it is in fact.