 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
What where "they" called when "they" exposed the fraud of making Human Trafficking "legal," in the criminal minds of the people who willfully invested into abject criminal enslavement of people by people for the exclusive fun, and the exclusive profit, of the so called "masters," at the cost of the slaves that were enslaved by those who were glued together in that network of institutionalized slavery?
The question reduced to a sound bite:
What did good people call good people, or, on the other hand, what label was chosen as a label to brand the people who worked to end institutionalized slavery?
Hint 2:
http://blackeyepress.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/stephen-pearl-andrews-1812...
"He went to Louisiana at age 18 and studied and practiced law there; appalled by slavery, he became an abolitionist. Having moved to Texas in 1839, he and his family were almost killed because of his abolitionist lectures and had to flee 1843."
When the criminals take over they invent words that work like magic upon those who willfully follow orders without questioning the right or wrong of such willful choices made by such people as those who are driven to act as they follow deceivers using deception as a very effective weapon of mass destruction.
What were good people called when good people set about abolishing criminal orders issued by criminals who took over government?
Rebels?
Insurgents?
What is that word I am looking for?
What is the punishment for speaking out against the frauds who took over?
What is the punishment for daring to speak out against those who are deceived by those frauds who took over?
In my case the punishment is exile.
I can easily bear that punishment. I can still ask for help, repeatedly asking, relentlessly asking, in the hope that someone will offer generous help in return for my efforts at abolishing deception in our networks of our efforts to return, not set aside, trial by jury, into general use by good people for good people.
On this Web Page is the following link:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/anti-federalist-papers
The next quote shows, beyond reasonable doubt, that people in at least one Republic in a working Federation, where good people, not abolitionists, people were good people, doing good things, as they acknowledged true law, and as they exposed the frauds for what the frauds were perpetrating in time and place.
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/anti-federalist-papers
Quote:______________________________
Antifederalist No. 15
RHODE ISLAND IS RIGHT!
This essay appeared in The Massachusetts Gazette, December 7, 1787, as reprinted From The Freeman's Journal; (Or, The North-America Intelligencer?)
The abuse which has been thrown upon the state of Rhode Island seems to be greatly unmerited. Popular favor is variable, and those who are now despised and insulted may soon change situations with the present idols of the people. Rhode Island has out done even Pennsylvania in the glorious work of freeing the Negroes in this country, without which the patriotism of some states appears ridiculous. The General Assembly of the state of Rhode Island has prevented the further importation of Negroes, and have made a law by which all blacks born in that state after March, 1784, are absolutely and at once free.
They have fully complied with the recommendations of Congress in regard to the late treaty of peace with Great Britain, and have passed an act declaring it to be the law of the land. They have never refused their quota of taxes demanded by Congress, excepting the five per cent impost, which they considered as a dangerous tax, and for which at present there is perhaps no great necessity, as the western territory, of which a part has very lately been sold at a considerable price, may soon produce an immense revenue; and, in the interim, Congress may raise in the old manner the taxes which shall be found necessary for the support of the government.
The state of Rhode Island refused to send delegates to the Federal Convention, and the event has manifested that their refusal was a happy one as the new constitution, which the Convention has proposed to us, is an elective monarchy, which is proverbially the worst government. This new government would have been supported at a vast expense, by which our taxes-the right of which is solely vested in Congress, (a circumstance which manifests that the various states of the union will be merely corporations) -- would be doubled or trebled. The liberty of the press is not stipulated for, and therefore may be invaded at pleasure. The supreme continental court is to have, almost in every case, "appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact," which signifies, if there is any meaning in words, the setting aside the trial by jury.
_______________________________________
There is intended meaning in words. If the meaning is intentionally false, then the source of the words spoken, or written, is a deceiver intending to deceive someone.
When does the master of deception become the slave of his own deceptions?
Just ask, and you may hear silence, or if you hear more deception, then that source confesses those answers.
Exile?