| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Sep 17th, 2014 11:22 am |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
Repeating, reinforcing, cluing in, offering, and offering information according to the advice found in scripture, so as to plead, with utmost sincerity, please, please, show me the plank in my own eye, in this case, or in any case, there are two cases afoot here and now. 1. "Legalized" Human Trafficking starting in 1787 in Philadelphia as the criminals took over a working federation of republics. 2. "Legally" setting aside Trial by Jury starting in 1787 in Philadelphia as the criminals took over a working federation of republics. Words mean precisely what the user of the word intends the words to mean, and if you do not know that much, then you may want to know that much too. In the Declaration of Independence the following words are reinforced if not repeated verbatim. "So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets." What were the people called when the people chose to acknowledge the fact that Human Trafficking was not legal? Words convey intending meaning. "So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets." If you want to be a slave, then invest in Legalized Human Trafficking. Call is slavery and your fraud does not work for you very well, does it? They are slaves, not me, so call them ignorant, not me, call them "other" people, but do not call them slaves, because that word means something to the slaves who know they are slaves. What were "they" called when they opposed the obvious fraud at work when the frauds made slavery "legal"?
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||