 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/monday-conference-call-7-17-2014
Early on in the call words were said claiming that only one of the people of New York attended (...they only had one person from New York...") the Con Con of 1787. Time: 30:50
If that is the claim, then that is false. Later on the claim was corrected as Alexander Hamilton was the only one (crook) who signed the usurpation.
Later on another claim is made on a name BRUTUS. Time: 1:19
http://www.constitution.org/afp/brutus00.htm
Quote_________________
The series of anti-federalist writing which most nearly paralleled and confronted The Federalist was a series of sixteen essays published in the New York Journal from October, 1787, through April, 1788, during the same period The Federalist was appearing in New York newspapers, under the pseudonym "Brutus", in honor of the Roman republican who was one of those who assassinated Julius Caesar, to prevent him from overthrowing the Roman Republic. The essays were widely reprinted and commented on throughout the American states. The author is thought by most scholars to have been Robert Yates, a New York judge, delegate to the Federal Convention, and political ally of anti-federalist New York Governor George Clinton. All of the essays were addressed to "the Citizens of the State of New York".
______________________
BRUTUS may be Robert Yates; listed here:
http://archive.org/stream/secretproceedin00convgoog#page/n112/mode/2up
_________________________
SECRET DEBATES
OF THE
FEDERAL CONVENTION
Notes of the Secrete Debates of the Federal Convention of 1787, taken by the late Hon. Robert Yates, Chief Justice of the State of New York, and one of the Delegates from that State to the said Convention
Friday, May 25th, 1787
Attended the convention of the States, at the State House in Philadelphia, when the following States were represented:
New York, Alexander Hamilton, Robert Yates
New Jersey, David Brearley, William Churchill Houston, William Paterson.
Pennsylvania, Robert Morris, Thomas Fitzsimons, James Wilson, Gouverneur Morris.
…
___________________________
Robert Yates and John Lansing:
____________________________
Letter
From the honorable Robert Yates, and the honorable John Lansing, Jun., Esquires, to the Governor of New York, containing their reasons for not subscribing to The Federal Constitution.
…; we, therefore, gave the principles of the constitution, which has received the sanctions of a majority of the convention, our decided and unreserved dessent…
_______________________________
So...
John Darash apparently thinks that 13 Colonies became States in 1787. Few people fought the war. And Alexander Hamilton was the only one from New York who helped create a Federated Government.
The actual facts are quite different. Many farmers and regular working people stopped working to perform their duties as defenders of Liberty as temporary armed forces. Those people began defending (called rebellion, insurrection, leveling, by the criminals who take over government) well before 1776.
1776 involved a list of people who recorded the general idea of Liberty then working in the minds of the people including the one deist named Thomas Paine.
http://www.deism.com/paine.htm
Early 1776 was the publication and sale of a high volume of copies of Common Sense.
Later in 1776 was the publication and recording of The Declaration of Independence.
Then the British began to put in place a number of traitors that included George Washington, Robert Morris, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Adams.
George Washington worked to destroy the voluntary militia forces. Robert Morris and Alexander Hamilton worked to build up the central bank fraud and the merchant monopolies including the beginnings of the black slave trade.
The people created a number of Republics, most of which were formed according to their own Constitutions and Bill of Rights, and those 13 Republics formed a Federation under The Articles of Federation.
All of that happened before the British were finally driven out when the French began offering significant military power against The British.
How people can't see this I have no idea.
After the British were driven out there were many people on the frontier lands who were driven into poverty by the banking cabal as Gresham's Law took over and drove gold out of circulation as the fraud money does every time the criminals try it. The people on the frontier areas again took up arms to defend Liberty and this time in Massachusetts the criminals won, and they drove the "rebels" out of Massachusetts
into Vermont.
There was no Consolidated Nation State Monopoly Power under The Articles of Confederation to force people in Vermont to return the slaves that ran into Vermont when those people lost the last battle of the Revolutionary War.
If you CANNOT listen to the reasoning offered by my words, so be it, that is fine, but you might want to look here:
http://www.amazon.com/Shayss-Rebellion-American-Revolutions-Battle/dp/08...
That was the proof of the concept of free market government, or true federation, at work, where people, at the last resort, can vote with their feet from a slave state, fleeing to find sanctuary in a free state, even while all states are formed into a voluntary defensive association.
You can't see it? Why? What word magic has you in a spell?
The Constitution made slavery legal according to those who did the dirty deed in 1787.
Yates was there as a representative from New York. Yates is now claimed to be BRUTUS as the writer who exposed the criminal takeover done by the so called Federalist Party, which consisted of George Washington, Robert Morris, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Adams, and who knows which black slave traders in the South?
Why is this news to anyone?
Time: 1:16:15
"...I'm kinda hoping to get California on board. We do have some people out there that have the ability to write and handle these things."
I was the first one to volunteer as California State Coordinator. I know Dave of San Diego. I know Debra of Kern. I know Sheila of Sonoma. I know other people in California. So far I do not know who these people in California are, these people connected to John Darash, whereby John Darash speaks of California almost every Monday night, and people in California are connected to John Darash.
I've been out of the loop, of there is a loop. How is it that my being out of the loop also includes my ink, paid for, my paper, paid for, is used in Constituting all the southern division of counties? How am I so far out of the loop, and yet somehow my input helps put California on the FULLY CONSTITUTED STATES list?
I don't get it. Perhaps someday the things envisioned by John Darash will happen in California, and then I get to meet these people who are so well connected to John Darash, giving John Darash reason to expect so much from these people in California.
For me, for my part, the goal is Liberty. I do not see the goal as indictments. Case 1, as far as I am concerned, should be the freeing of all the slaves in California who are currently suffering under the mortgage fraud or Federal Reserve Interest. Case 2, as far as I am concerned, should be the freeing of all the salves in California who are currently suffering under the Internal Revenue Extortion Service. How are we supposed to indict a Federal Reserve Chairman? What would be the point? Why not work on standing in between the goons working for the International Monetary FUND (IRS and FED) and their victims, and do so locally, in each county, simply, easily, non-violently, defending them against any further injury?
Here is Johnny Liberty:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9a9PYp94T8
Red Beckman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__3BuJMNR_0
Time: 1:19:30
That is where John Darash speaks of BRUTUS as if someone worked to get things done right in the CON CON of 1787. That is all false according to the information I have found. BRUTUS was (likely) Robert Yates. Robert Yates was an opponent during the CON CON and then that document, that CON CON Constitution of 1787, that Slave Trading, Piracy, Money Monopoly, Monarchy, Nationalist Nation State Central Banking Monopoly Organized Crime Dirty Compromise, was set in stone. It was done. It was go or no go. It was adopt or reject. It was sold as something good by evil people who told lies to sell it, and it was opposed by BRUTUS after it was opposed by Robert Yates.
How does that history, well recorded as fact, become someone helping to create that slave trading document?
What is missing?
Time: 1:19:40 (or so)
"...he must be a philosopher..."
No, according to the evidence offered, he was Robert Yates. A philosopher at that time might have been Thomas Paine, the deist. Robert Yates was a representative from New York sent to Philadelphia to preserve Liberty, not destroy it, so he left the Con Con - did not sign it, and for good reason, reasons he explained in detail.
Who listened then?
Who listens now?