 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
http://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/manage/optin?v=00120POhs3qUFRy3Jt...
Cut and pasted from e-mail notice:
_______________________________________________________
"BUNDY RANCH
BUNKERVILLE, NEVADA
Read by Ammon Bundy at the Clark County Sheriff Precinct, May 2, 2014
As we have had the opportunity to reflect on the events that took place between March 26th and April 12th, 2014-we have experienced feelings of concern, confusion, fear, anger, sadness and joy.
Our peaceful community has been shaken. In many ways, we are still processing the magnitude of what took place. We ask ourselves so many questions; did the federal government really come into this valley and terrorize our community?
Did hundreds of armed forces, in Red Dawn fashion, lock down the hills and valleys of our peaceful home-threatening at gunpoint, anyone who stepped off the paved road, with forceful and lethal action?
Did we really see armed forces convoying through the streets of our town, diligently recording names and identities of anyone who glanced wrong or opposed them in any way?
Was there really heavy equipment in the form of dump trucks and backhoes, on our mountains, tearing up infrastructure that we have used for hundreds of years, and is vital to our survival? Were we truly in the cross-hairs of snipers, and under surveillance by the latest in technological weapons?
Did these forces actually point their rifles in the faces of our little children, while beating their unarmed fathers to the dirt and hauling them off in chains?
Did they really body-slam our friend, a 59 year old woman to the ground, and sic German Shepherds on our neighbors-even a pregnant woman?
Did they actually shock a man multiple times with a 50,000 volt Taser for honorably protecting his aunt, while she gathered herself out of the dust?
We reflect in sadness and awe that this could take place in our little town. The terror of armed men occupying our land will never be forgotten. The feelings of despair of these events will long reside in our hearts. Thoughts of anxiousness that this may ever happen again, will awaken us from our pillows from time to time.
During quiet reflection, we may ask ourselves if we did the right thing by resisting. Were we in the right when we acted to safeguard ourselves? When the only response to our multiple pleas for help was silence, when we were left alone to clean our cuts and wounds, did we have a divine right, duty, and obligation to protect our family and ourselves?
We recall the many times we pleaded with our local government to protect us; the numerous times we called 911, and begged our Sheriff to send his deputies to assist. Our cries of distress were met with silence. We ask ourselves, "Did we try hard enough to get our local government and law enforcement to act as a buffer and perform their duty to protect and serve?"
Were the hundreds of phone calls not enough, or is it just that our elected leaders and Sheriff have forsaken the people in trade for power and money? We whole-heartedly want to believe that our Sheriff would not abandon us, but where has his shielding influence been?
Why was he not here to represent and protect the very men, women and children of his county that he swore an oath for? Why did he stand silent and neutral, knowing our community was in terror? What was his motivation of inaction; was it fear of the federal government or political reprisal from powerful politicians?
The scars of this traumatic event will heal over time. We hope our community will eventually return to a sense of normalcy. We fervently hope and pray that these heavy-handed tactics will not be used on us or any other American ever again. We wonder if our hopes will be in vain; will they return?
Will they come back with greater force and more cunning tactics than before? Will our Sheriff keep his oath this time, and use his lawful forces to stop them, or will the people be left to their own protection? Will the good people of this nation yet again have to come running to the rescue of a neighbor?
Will veterans, retired police force, churches, businesses, families and individuals have to unite once again to confront these acts of governmental terror upon the American people?
Will our local government rouse themselves from disaffection and intervene-protecting the people? Will they stop fearing to do the right thing and come to the realization that the people are more important than a government agency? Will they fight for the rights of the state and her people?
They must stop putting personal gain and advancement in front of the rights of citizens.
They need to recognize, that as our elected representatives, they have more power than those governing in brute force, as they have the might of the people of this state backing them. With that power we invest in them, they have the obligation to safeguard our livelihoods, combat forces of fear, and protect our lives with their own.
A few weeks ago, our community was in a state of innocence and naivety. We felt safe and mostly kept to ourselves. We thought the world's problems would only affect us through television, and could be shut off with the push of a button.
Our innocence has left us now, we have experienced first-hand the breath of force upon our necks. We have gasped in desperation as our lives and agency were threatened. Our cries have been ignored by our guardians in the next room.
We faced a choice-either lie down and submit helplessly in defeat, or bite, scratch, and fight until help would come. We are eternally and profoundly grateful for the many heroic neighbors who heard our desperate cries and crashed through the windows to rescue.
We additionally thank the thousands that came from every States in this great nation, and stood in front of raised guns in our defense, and for the hope that those same guns would never come to their doors and their families.
We are grateful for those that arrived with pen and camera, those that arrived with faith and prayers, and those that arrived with fist and gun. The variety of support from all walks of life has shown that this was an event that truly touched the good hearts of many Americans.
We cannot thank you all enough-you have restored our faith in the goodness of the American people. Our message to all, is that it is time to make things right. It is time to adhere to the supreme law of the land-The Constitution of the United States.
It is time to understand right, stand for what's right, and do whatever it takes to make it right. We must continue the vision of our Founding Fathers in preserving the freedoms of the American people and the sovereign rights of the States.
A nation can never abandon its fate to an authority it cannot control.
Men must decide if their rights and freedoms are God-granted or are assigned by a federal government. We believe in the rule of laws and sustain a limited government. May God bless us to protect this sacred instrument.
Thank you,
The Bundy Family
Please Forward to friends and family.
____________________________________________________
The secretary here at the Provisional San Bernardino Common Law Grand Jury room is my wife, so she forwarded that to family, or to friend, and I as Administrator of the Provisional San Bernardino County Common Law Grand Jury Due Process Jury room share that with Friends of Liberty, as I interpret the request, and the reasoning of offering such information.
Anyone claiming that secret messages can be kept from our enemies is probably not up to speed on the latest "intelligence" gathering technology used by our enemies foreign and domestic, so my life is an open book; within obvious limits: who really cares about all this information?
A principle is at work when our enemies foreign and domestic are spread too thin and there are way too many effective defenders defending from way too many advantage points based upon honest truth, honor, justice, mercy, and simple decency. The word effective deterrence applies in this manner.
When their lies are being torn down the cages bottling up accurate accounting flows out of those cages in a flood.
How can the best information be utilized most effectively for our common defense?
Now you may see, in that question, why I think discussion is a powerful tool that can be used to answer that vital question with many competitive answers and a process can work so as to pick through the best answers and arrive at best of the best answers leading to right steps taken first; instead of right steps never taken at all.
Why, for example, is there no mention by anyone other than very few of us, as far as I can see, concerning the obvious process by which the events in BUNKERVILLE are no longer repeated by the criminals because the criminals know, beyond a reasonable doubt, that they cannot profit from such crimes in our country?
The obvious process can be walked through step by step for anyone wanting to know how due process works according to our common law.
All that is needed is the will to invent each step, borrow each step, copy each step, adapt each step, along the way in an obvious common sense, common law, due process defense that is effective in defending against all enemies foreign and domestic.
Removing thousands of failed methods and zeroing in with laser like focus on the one tried and true method, which is our common law grand jury due process, or our common law trial by jury due process, instead of any other kangaroo court type counterfeit version of our law of our land, leads to which step done by who right there in that county?
What happens if those events are happening now, or soon, in the county you live in?
What happens if those events are happening right down your street, or road, or trail, where you live?
The same common defense, common law, common sense, accurate accounting solution works in any case.
A victim or a representative of the victim documents precisely what injury is done to the victim, when, where, and by who, in any case.
How is that not an obvious moral, common sense, common law, due process, common defense vital step to be taken in a case where a crime, by a fraud hiding behind color law especially, has been perpetrated?
This is not that tough to realize, so why are only a few people seeing this from this angle of view whereby effective defense is realized in every single case without exception?
Example:
http://commonamericanjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/BLM-Claims-B...
That is one very small, but telling, bit of evidence in this case.
That bit of evidence is handed to someone who will then assemble further information and then a few people, perhaps 4 people, perhaps 5 people, gain access to our common law grand jury due process as if it was their own sorry asses on the line, and they call forth 25 people out of the jury pool to sit as common law grand jury members commanding our common law grand jury.
I can read plain English:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Those words do not tell me that people need permission from some criminal to then get permission from some criminal to defend against some criminal. Criminals do not follow the laws they claim to be enforcing upon their victims.
Our ancestors were fully aware of that simple fact.
We the people must effect our own defense and we have the tools to do it and those tools are called presentments and indictments whereby the victim is defended as the accused are placed on trial if no other reasonable restitution is afforded to the victim by any means whatsoever.
Please, please, stop being a criminal? The criminals demand that the victims pay them for protection from them, and we the victims are inspired to ask the criminals for mercy?
So that attack dog in that picture represents a misled force of aggression whereby the force of aggression causes an injury upon a victim.
So the victim is inspired to ask the criminals for mercy while the victim pays the criminal all the earnings, the economic power, that the criminal demands as protection money?
Only a few people actually solve this problem?
The one ordering the aggressive force into actions that result in the injury of innocent people are perpetrating crimes, and that is how criminals get away with their crimes, because the criminals are never the ones proven to be the ones issuing the criminal orders.
That one, in that picture, is ordering the dog to attack an innocent victim.
Who, precisely who, ordered that one into such a difficult position as to be following criminal orders or refusing to follow criminals orders which then results in unemployment, economic hardship, loss of profits?
The dog was able to make a better choice than to follow criminal orders.
The original order to unleash the dogs of war constitute the root, base, origin, of that crime as that crime STILL progresses.
The criminal in our common law faces due process for his own protection, because natural law is understood in our common law, natural law and our common law are based upon the same principles. A criminal will eventually be consumed by their own wrongdoing, which can be called blowback, or it can be illustrated in other accurate accounts all throughout our common history.
The common law process is a willful intent by the people to find the root cause of the crime in progress and to NULLIFY it before it spreads and consumes more and more victims.
The process in the common law grand jury phase can be easily understood in this specific example.
The Sheriff who decides to abandon his duties (Declaration of Independence clearly defines our duties as moral people) will not be paid for abandoning his duties or those payments flow in that way, from the public fund into the hands of a derelict, according to whose orders?
What are the punishments for dereliction of duty according to the Statutes that define the duties of the Sheriff in that county?
The example provided by The Unified Common Law Grand Jury of New York offers an additional dereliction of duty in the form of a derelict Prosecutor who is also paid very well out of the public fund for, at least, failing to do their job according to their own Statutes that prescribe their duties.
The duties of the people, on the other hand, are clear in any moral mind, in any place, where an innocent victim is currently suffering at the hands of a busy gang of criminals. To do nothing is dereliction of duty, and all that nothing will buy anyone is a delay in the time it takes before the criminals start working on everybody, and the cost for those who are derelict in our common sense, moral, duties is our existing as beasts in Hell on Earth of our making.
So the derelict Sheriff and the derelict Prosecutor, in any case, is at a minimum guilty of failing to do their duties according to the Statues that govern their duties that they must do in order for them to receive compensation out of the public fund.
The attack man ordering the attack dog now has company in the list of names of people guilty of their own crimes of morality, their own crimes according to their own governing Statues, and they are then guilty of obstruction of justice according to our common law, because their actions separate the people from our common defense, common law grand jury, due process.
BLM man with attack dog follows criminal orders and there is no common law grand jury indictment handed to the Sheriff, who must make a choice, to arrest the criminal, or criminals, who issue the original criminal order to attack innocent people with attack dogs?
By the way, this does not escape my notice, even if this escapes the readers notice, or even if this escapes the notice of anyone who saw the video, real time, when those attack dogs were ordered to attack innocent people, and what did not escape my notice was how the attack dogs refused to follow the criminal order.
It is a sorry State when those who are hired to take good care of public lands are less capable of moral judgment than a well trained attack dog.
Note too, those people hired to take good care of public lands who backed away from the confrontation at the fence, after they threatened innocent people with their guns drawn, did make the right decision in that case, obviously, so the accurate account ought to be recorded well in that specific case of moral judgment. Where those "BLM" agents ordered to back away, or did they decide on their own authority to do the right thing despite having been sent, by criminal orders, to perpetrate obvious crimes upon innocent victims?
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
Amendment VII
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Like moral conscience our laws of our land are either used or lost in time and place.
What is the next step?