 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
The Constitution of 1787 was ratified, but could never be adopted by the States of the United States of America, as the territory of concern belonged to the United States of America. The Constitution is Organic Law that is only applicable to territory and other property belonging to the United States of America, so a State like New Hampshire could ratify the Constitution, but it could not adopt it. The Constitution was created in secret and then arranged like a puzzle, so only those who knew the code could really understand it. Adoption is one of those secrets. None of the original thirteen states could adopt the Constitution because the Constitution was meant to apply to territory and property that belonged to the United States of America. Adoption by most of the States began after the Civil War, however, the government remained broken because the President Elect continued to refuse to take the proper oath.
So...the United States (singular) is created by, and owned by, the Federated States (plural) collectively?
The first President of the United States, George Washington, thus became the first "federal" tax collector. The word "federal" is a misnomer. The taxes imposed by the Congress of the United States are not based on any so-called federal authority over the States. The basis of the taxes is proprietary. In order to prepare the rest of the new central government that was made possible by Washington’s self appointment to the Office of President of the United States, the Congress of the United States enacted a new oath patterned after the oath in Article VI, but made compatible with the oath of the President of the United States to "preserve, protect and defend" the assets of the United States of America.
Putting aside the word magic for awhile it may be important here to understand that this author misses the point.
The point is clearly stated here:
"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.
"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter."
From:
Reclaiming Revolution
In other words, the Pennsylvania situation was not a local problem. The problem everywhere was MONOPOLY FRAUD MONEY causing Gresham's Law to take affect and Gold was driven off-shore (to pay for imports) which causes a BUST in economy for lack of CURRENCY. CURRENCY can't increase VELOCITY if there is no CURRENCY.
If there is no CURRENCY those inventive people on the Frontier create their own CURRENCY in any form that works including Whiskey. So the so called TAX (fraud) on Whiskey (payable in Gold mind you) added insult to injury and in those days it was common knowledge (enough to inspire Revolution) how the Money Monopoly Debt Pyramid was worked by the DESPOTS who take over defensive government (common law grand jury due process).
It is not accurate to say that there was an isolated group of people in Pennsylvania.
HERE
In that book are reports describing why Pennsylvania was chosen by the Central Bank Criminals (Hamilton and Washington) as the weakest area of possible resistance to Tyranny.
The goal was the capture of every productive human being in this country by fraud and extortion made legal, by the utilization of a Legal Money Monopoly Power combined with a Single Involuntary Tax Power.
In order to reach that goal the Central Bankers (even before Communists like Engles made a Central Bank one of their "Planks") MUST destroy all money competition.
Whiskey was Free Market Money Competition which is only useful as money when better money like Gold and Silver is driven out of the country by Gresham's Law which is a symptom of Fraudulent Legal Money Monopoly Power.
If the Gold is leaving, then that is proof that the Money Monopoly Power already exists at the time of Shays's Rebellion AND at the time of The Whiskey Rebellion.
Evidence uncovering Central Banker Frauds at Work
In the autumn of 1690 an expedition, sent by Massachusetts to capture Quebec, returned without success. To defray its cost, which amounted to forty thousand pounds, and to satisfy complaints of "the want of an adequate measure of commerce," the general court, in December, 1690, ordered the issue of "seven thousand pounds of printed bills of equal value with money;" and of the remainder in May, 1691. In July, 1692, within nineteen months of the earliest emission, the first legislature under the new charter which transformed the self-governing colony of Massachusetts Bay into a direct dependency of Great Britain, made "all" these "bills of public credit current within this province in all payments equivalent to money, excepting specialties and contracts made before the publication" of this new law. Their credit was supported by receiving them in all public payments at a premium of five percent.
George and Alexander (probably Robert Morris heavy in the thick of it too) were Puppets working for The Bank of England Criminals.
Folks, this is still scratching the surface. Who do you think was behind the Drug Pushing done to China by the so called "East India Company"?
George and Alexander Puppets of The Corporation
Back to Washington the Tax Collector:
Combining the Office of President of the United States and the Office of President, which in turn included the Office of President of the United States of America made it appear as if George Washington had been made an American king. If any one questioned the coronation of such an American potentate, it could be laid to the will of the people. After all, they had approved the new Constitution.
That is stretching things beyond the breaking point. The Central Banker Cabal (False Federalists) sold lies through their control of Mass Media of that time period, which was newspapers, as their lies were formed into those False Federalist Papers. You know how campaign promises work: say anything to get in office, and then do whatever pleases the dictator once in office.
Hamilton clearly does so in the reference already quoted above.
It is hardy a case whereby the people RATified the constitution, and omitting the very well elucidated warnings of RAT SMELL offered by Mason and Henry during the RATification process is a dangerous case of ignorance at best.
The most obvious example I found was spoken into the Public Record by George Mason as follows:
RAT SMELL IS PUTRID
George Mason Speech Virginia Ratifying Convention
June 04, 1788
Mr. Chairman—Whether the Constitution be good or bad, the present clause clearly discovers, that it is a National Government, and no longer a confederation. I mean that clause which gives the first hint of the General Government laying direct taxes. The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes, does of itself, entirely change the confederation of the States into one consolidated Government. This power being at discretion, unconfined, and without any kind of controul, must carry every thing before it. The very idea of converting what was formerly confederation, to a consolidated Government, is totally subversive of every principle which has hitherto governed us. This power is calculated to annihilate totally the State Governments. Will the people of this great community submit to be individually taxed by two different and distinct powers? Will they suffer themselves to be doubly harrassed? These two concurrent powers cannot exist long together; the one will destroy the other: The General Government being paramount to, and in every respect more powerful than, the State governments, the latter must give way to the former.
That is hardy a case whereby the people embrace a known group of enemies of Liberty as if doing so was a good idea.
Back to George the Tax Man:
George Washington was a virtuous man,...
According to who?
George Washington?
How about Murray Rothbard's study and report on Generalissimo Washington:
His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical distinctions of rank imposed between officers and men. As a consequence, officers could not enforce their wills coercively on the soldiery. This New England equality horrified Washington's conservative and highly aristocratic soul.
To introduce a hierarchy of ruling caste, Washington insisted on distinctive decorations of dress in accordance with minute gradations of rank. As one observer phrased it: "New lords, new laws. … The strictest government is taking place, and great distinction is made between officers and soldier. Everyone is made to know his place and keep it." Despite the great expense involved, he also tried to stamp out individuality in the army by forcing uniforms upon them; but the scarcity of cloth made this plan unfeasible.
At least as important as distinctions in decoration was the introduction of extensive inequality in pay. Led by Washington and the other aristocratic southern delegates, and over the objections of Massachusetts, the Congress insisted on fixing a pay scale for generals and other officers considerably higher than that of the rank and file.
In addition to imposing a web of hierarchy on the Continental Army, Washington crushed liberty within by replacing individual responsibility by iron despotism and coercion. Severe and brutal punishments were imposed upon those soldiers whose sense of altruism failed to override their instinct for self-preservation. Furloughs were curtailed and girlfriends of soldiers were expelled from camp; above all, lengthy floggings were introduced for all practices that Washington considered esthetically or morally offensive. He even had the temerity to urge Congress to raise the maximum number of strikes of the lash from 39 to the enormous number of 500; fortunately, Congress refused.
In a few short months, Washington had succeeded in extirpating a zealous, happy, individualistic people's army, and transforming it into yet another statist army, filled with bored, resentful, and even mutinous soldiery. The only thing he could not do was force the troops to continue in camp after their terms of enlistment were up at the end of the year, and by now the soldiers were longing for home. In addition to all other factors, Americans were not geared – nor should they have been – for a lengthy conflict of position and attrition; they were not professional soldiers, and they were needed at their homes and jobs and on their farms. Had they been a frankly guerrilla army, there would have been no conflict between these roles.
Dictators are virtuous?
Which virtues are those virtues?
Back to George the Tax Man:
George Washington, as presiding officer of the secret Constitutional Convention made certain that the final draft of the Constitution was arranged so that taking the oath of President of the United States would be perceived to bind Washington to the Office of President under "this Constitution" and to be President of the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation. Washington was able to take over the original Confederacy and the territory ceded to the United States of America, because before Washington was elected to the Office of President, he had been a national hero as Commander in Chief under the Continental Congress and the Articles of Confederation. His election to the Office of President and his long association with the United States of America facilitated public confusion when he took the Office of President of the United States instead of the Office of President.
So the commission of fraud at the highest level is a virtue?