 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
This is similar to the concept of traveling on land and water at the same time.
This is similar to being nighttime and daytime at the same time in the same place.
This concept of being either one or the other and not both at the same time includes the concept of Serving Two Masters.
George Mason Virginia Ratifying Convention June 04, 1788
Mr. Chairman—Whether the Constitution be good or bad, the present clause clearly discovers, that it is a National Government, and no longer a confederation. I mean that clause which gives the first hint of the General Government laying direct taxes. The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes, does of itself, entirely change the confederation of the States into one consolidated Government. This power being at discretion, unconfined, and without any kind of controul, must carry every thing before it. The very idea of converting what was formerly confederation, to a consolidated Government, is totally subversive of every principle which has hitherto governed us. This power is calculated to annihilate totally the State Governments. Will the people of this great community submit to be individually taxed by two different and distinct powers? Will they suffer themselves to be doubly harrassed? These two concurrent powers cannot exist long together; the one will destroy the other: The General Government being paramount to, and in every respect more powerful than, the State governments, the latter must give way to the former.
Returning to Carl Miller
At time 37:21 in Part II Know Your Constitution the following:
U S v. CRUIKSHANK, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not.
Now, from Carla in Los Angeles the following information is connected to me and my concerns repeated above:
George Washington Jailer And Tax Collector
Washington broke the government, so he could become the chief tax collector for the Congress of the United States and, also, so he could jail anyone who refused to consent to be taxed. Broken American government has been falling apart steadily since George Washington first broke it. As I explain in this report, fixing the government is as easy as getting the President Elect to take an oath "to support this Constitution." That part of the oath of Office of President of the United States to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States," explains that the "United States" means the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America.
Previous Findings
Generalissimo Washington: How He Crushed the Spirit of Liberty by Murray N. Rothbard
Full Text of the Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation BY AUTHORITY By the president of the United States of America A Proclamation
Why would anyone willfully choose to remain fooled? The lie infects the liar?
Contempt before Investigation
“There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance that principle is contempt prior to investigation.”
George Washington Jailer And Tax Collector
Returning to the study of that report relinked above:
Why would a good and virtuous man like George Washington want to become a dictator? Washington wanted to pay for the war with Britain and becoming a tax collector was the only way he and Alexander Hamilton thought it could be done. The Declaration of Independence recognized that men were inherently free and the Articles of Confederation constrained the national government’s assertion of power against the people of the states.
Washington had no faith in the people and the men who had won the war to pay for their own freedom. The American people would pay their debts, but they would do it truthfully, honestly and on their own terms. George Washington wanted to pay it now and he also wanted to help his friends. The Constitutional Convention would be the means by which he would become the Commander in Chief of tax collections for the Congress of the United States.
The Declaration of Independence left all governments broken except those like the United States of America that provided a mutual self-defense force. Before Washington presided over the secret Constitutional Convention and produced the Constitution, the United States, in Congress assembled, which was the governing body of the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation, could only ask the states to pay their proportionate share based upon the value of lands, buildings and improvements within the state.
The United States of America could not impose taxes directly on the people of the thirteen states. Within a few years after Rhode Island became the thirteenth State to ratify the Constitution western farmers in Pennsylvania were revolting against the imposition of excises on the distillation of alcohol. The United States of America still couldn’t tax the people of the states directly, but the United States could and did. The states of the old Union, the United States of America, became the United States under the new Union. Article I Section 2 Clause 3 provided for Representatives and direct Taxes to be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union. The new Union was to be comprised of territory and other property belonging to the United States of America. The plan of the written Constitution was for the appointive Office of President of the United States to administer the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America and located in the States of the perpetual Union.
After George Washington broke the government, the President of the United States had regained the former power of a British monarch to imprison those who would not obey the written law of the realm. Technically, the realm was limited to the territory owned outright by the United States of America. Alexander Hamilton was responsible for the excise on alcohol produced in the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America. George Washington raised an army larger than any he commanded during the Revolutionary War to put down the Whiskey Rebellion. The leaders of the Whiskey Rebellion against unlawful excise taxes in Pennsylvania would be tried and convicted of treason for their rebellion against a tax that could not be imposed outside of the territory and other property belonging to the United States of America.
Not reported in that report is the events that became known as Shays's Rebellion. The impetus for created the fraud that became known later as The Constitutional Convention were those events that later became know as Shays's Rebellion.
Back to Washington the Tax Collector:
Americans, before the Declaration of Independence, were taxed by the British Parliament using the governing powers of the reigning monarch. Such taxation had caused Americans and the Second Continental Congress to break with Britain and George III, King of England. The Declaration of Independence cited the King for combining "with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation"…[f]or imposing Taxes on us without our Consent." George Washington did not sign the Declaration of Independence, so he would have no problem breaking an existing and functioning American government and using acts of pretended legislation to impose Hamilton’s taxation without the consent of the persons being taxed.
The events that became known as Shays's Rebellion clearly wrote the writing on the wall that would eventually end any Slavery in America. The Federal Design of Free Market Government was proven to be a working concept as explained HERE:
Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.
Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government,the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely.
There was no fraudulent "national" or "consolidated" government POWER to crush a matter of internal challenges to false authority within any State; which were those events that became known as Shays's Rebellion. Even though the criminals running Massachusetts State (heavily indebted to the Bank of England, and failing in their aggressive war for profit into Canada) crushed The Last Battle of the Revolutionary War (Shays's Rebellion) those Slaves that managed to escape capture or worse fled to a less despotic state in the Federation; Daniel Shays escaped into Vermont.
Daniel Shays proved the fact that a Federal design of Free Market government works.
That is what drove George Washington out of retirement, certainly urged along by Robert Morris and Alexander Hamilton, whereby the so called Federalists (actually Nationalists) would then perpetrate that fraud that became known later (history written by the victors) as The Constitutional Convention.
Quote:
One party, whose object and wish it was to abolish and annihilate all State governments, and to bring forward one general government, over this extensive continent, of monarchical nature, under certain restrictions and limitations. Those who openly avowed this sentiment were, it is true, but few; yet it is equally true, Sir, that there were a considerable number, who did not openly avow it, who were by myself, and many others of the convention, considered as being in reality favorers of that sentiment; and, acting upon those principles, covertly endeavoring to carry into effect what they well knew openly and avowedly could not be accomplished.
Back to Washington the Tax Collector:
The creation of a Senate to replace the delegates to the United States, in Congress assembled is not a repeal of the Articles of Confederation.
And:
As no additional executive power is created by the Constitution, no one can claim a three-branch government has been created.
And:
The Federal Government hopes you will continue to ignore that the President of the United States and the President of the United States of America are two different offices.
Here is a point of extreme caution according to my own study. There is no such thing as "The Federal Government" as a single, responsible, and therefore accountable, decision making being: NO ENTITY UNTO ITSELF.
The English language offers a convenience by which one term (a legal fiction) can be used to identify a set of people who belong in that set of people.
Therefore "The Federal Government" is a list of names of people, NOT AN ENTITY UNTO ITSELF.
Therefore The Federal Government cannot hope. People who belong in the set of people who are The Federal Government can hope, or not hope, as each individual may do, or not do, as they are within that set of people knowable as The Federal Government. Certainly if those people rely upon a fraud in order to keep the stolen loot flowing into their fraudulent bank accounts they would then hope that the targeted victims don't find out about the fraud in progress; but each individual is responsible, and accountable, for such hopes: NOT A NEBULOUS LEGAL FICTION OF LIMITED LIABILITY.
Back to Washington the Tax Collector:
By now, it should be obvious that the Office of President of the United States is not the same office as the President of the United States of America. Incessant substitutions and repetition by government, schools and the media have caused the two different offices to merge in one President and that President is collecting taxes for Congress and putting people in prison for alleged violations of written law. In a sense, the Constitution does merge the Office of President of the United States of America with the Office of President by amending the Organic Law that created the United States of America. The Articles of Confederation declare in antique yet still valid language: "The stile of this confederacy shall be "The United States of America." Just as the first Organic Law declares all men to be equal the second confirms all the States of the United States of America to be equal, thus, the Articles were famous for not permitting taxation of the people of the Union.
Is that worth knowing, verifying, and worthy of gaining currency like a Pop Rock Song?
Moving on in Washington the Tax Collector:
The Government Manual confirms that the United States Government is limited to territory owned by the United States of America, by the inclusion of only the Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States as the Organic Law of the United States.
If I understand that report so far, the fraud is a bait and switch routine whereby there is a legal entity that governs a very small amount of land and a very few number of subjects, or slaves, or employees, and that legal fiction is:
The Constitution of 1787 created a new Union of States called "The United States"
That legal fiction cannot lawfully tax anyone other than those few employees (slaves) that are fooled into joining that involuntary association. It is a fraud on its face; like the Mafia claims that once you join you can never leave.
So the bait is to claim that there is this Legal Fiction that is this little thing right here, a few square miles known as Washington D.C. and a few other places in each Constitutionally Limited Republic within the Voluntary Union Federated under The Articles of Confederation.
So many words, such a simple fraud.
"The stile of this confederacy shall be "The United States of America."
There are those Constitutionally Limited Republics Federated under The Articles of Confederation.
The Constitution of 1787 created a new Union of States called "The United States"
There is that Legal Fiction claiming dictatorial powers over the fools who are foolish enough to be subjected to dictatorial powers.
"The stile of this confederacy shall be "The United States of America."
There is the bait.
The Constitution of 1787 created a new Union of States called "The United States"
There is the switch.
The George and Alexander Magic Act?
The Washington and Hamilton Dog and Pony Show?
The Government Manual confirms that the United States Government is limited to territory owned by the United States of America, by the inclusion of only the Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States as the Organic Law of the United States.
So...the proof of the crime in progress is such that the bait clearly forbids direct taxation of the people by a dictatorship, while the switch clearly claims the power to subject subjects to dictatorial enslavement, and within The Government Manual there is evidence proving that ONE is ONE and BOTH are not ONE.
ONE is Liberty, or a Federal Free Market Government design that has a proven track record, and the false ONE is a dictatorship, so why are We The People confusing the two as if the two are ONE?
ONE:
"The stile of this confederacy shall be "The United States of America."
Fraudulent ONE:
The Constitution of 1787 created a new Union of States called "The United States"
The Free Market ONE is not the Fraudulent ONE.
ONE, the Free Market ONE, includes common law grand jury due process.
The Fraudulent ONE MUST IGNORE any competition that threatens the Fraudulent Government because IT IS DICTATORSHIP.
Evident by omission?
The Constitution of 1787 created a new Union of States called "The United States" that were not yet equal to the States of the United States of America. The third Organic Law, "The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787," recognized the Northwest Territory in Article 4 as "a part of this Confederacy of the United States of America, subject to the Articles of Confederation, and to such alterations therein as be constitutionally made." The Constitution of 1787 made "such alterations" to such a degree that the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 was replaced by it. The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 remains as the third Organic Law of the United States of America, but it is no longer useful to the United States Government, so the Organic Law of that government is limited to the first and last Organic Laws. The Government Manual confirms that the United States Government is limited to territory owned by the United States of America, by the inclusion of only the Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States as the Organic Law of the United States.
Omitting the Articles of Confederation in the "chain of command" or "relation back" or "take me to your leader" or "succession of authority" or "hierarchy" proves that the ONE (The United States = singular) is not the other ONE ((The United States of America = plural) because ONE (The United States = singular) is not subject to The Articles of Confederation, while the other ONE (The United States of America = plural) is subject to The Articles of Confederation.
As such:
The Dictatorship subjecting the fools foolish enough to sign a pact with the devil, or be captured by fraud and extortion made legal, or The United States (singular):
The Constitution of 1787 created a new Union of States called "The United States" that were not yet equal to the States of the United States of America. The third Organic Law, "The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787," recognized the Northwest Territory in Article 4 as "a part of this Confederacy of the United States of America, subject to the Articles of Confederation, and to such alterations therein as be constitutionally made." The Constitution of 1787 made "such alterations" to such a degree that the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 was replaced by it. The Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 remains as the third Organic Law of the United States of America, but it is no longer useful to the United States Government, so the Organic Law of that government is limited to the first and last Organic Laws. The Government Manual confirms that the United States Government is limited to territory owned by the United States of America, by the inclusion of only the Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States as the Organic Law of the United States.
As such:
Constitutionally Limited Republics Voluntarily Joined (can pay for or refuse to pay for) into a Mutual Defense Union known as The United States of America (plural).
The Articles of Confederation declare in antique yet still valid language: "The stile of this confederacy shall be "The United States of America." Just as the first Organic Law declares all men to be equal the second confirms all the States of the United States of America to be equal, thus, the Articles were famous for not permitting taxation of the people of the Union.
Do I see this being our reality in this country accurately, or are my eyes still clouded over with word magic?