 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Friend of Liberty or Enemy foreign and Domestic?
Voluntary Association or Involuntary Association?
Every criminal creates an Involuntary Association even if the criminal has created a very large army of criminals whereby the most powerful criminal calls himself King among the criminals.
Every criminal association works the same way, as a pyramid structure, whereby the most powerful criminal keeps the leaser criminals in line by simple, easy to recognize, easy to understand methods as follows:
1. Deception (you have no choice, you must obey, and you must obey without question, and the first order is to work harder and pay more of your earnings to the criminals who make their Involuntary Association)
2. Threat of violence (You can't follow the order to obey without question so you will be made an example of what happens to those who do not obey)
3. Aggressive violence upon the innocent (The best examples of what happens to those who do not obey are those who are too weak and innocent to fight back so having their bodies burned alive sends the best message that inspires the other slaves to greater effort as they work themselves to death to make the criminals more and more powerful)
So...
Friends of Liberty know better, we band together in defense when the criminals take over our power of defense.
Example:
Trial by Jury
Quote:
FOR more than six hundred years - that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 - there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.
Unless such be the right and duty of jurors, it is plain that, instead of juries being a "palladium of liberty "- a barrier against the tyranny and oppression of the government - they are really mere tools in its hands, for carrying into execution any injustice and oppression it may desire to have executed.
But for their right to judge of the law, and the justice of the law, juries would be no protection to an accused person, even as to matters of fact; for, if the government can dictate to a jury any law whatever, in a criminal case, it can certainly dictate to them the laws of evidence. That is, it can dictate what evidence is admissible, and what inadmissible, and also what force or weight is to be given to the evidence admitted. And if the government can thus dictate to a jury the laws of evidence, it can not only make it necessary for them to convict on a partial exhibition of the evidence rightfully pertaining to the case, but it can even require them to convict on any evidence whatever that it pleases to offer them.
That method of voluntary association (trial by jury and common law) was corrupted to a point at which the victims of criminals taking over government fled England (and Europe) to America.
Those who ran away from criminals who took over government (crushing trial by jury, crushing common law, and crushing government by the consent of the governed, and crushing Voluntary Association) settled in America and there was again a time whereby trail by jury and government by consent of the government regained common practice among regular people, or common people, in common law.
Example:
Declaration of Independence
Quote:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
Consent of the governed means, literally, government by voluntary association.
Those who work to take from you your voluntary consent resort to obvious tactics that every single criminal ever to have existed use.
1. Deception
2. Threat of violence
3. Aggressive Violence upon the innocent (they always find best criminal effect by targeting the innocent AS A RULE)
This march back to Liberty (consent made legal) is a march going in the opposite direction of the march to Despotism (crime made legal).
You will find, on this march back to Liberty, people who WILL employ deception aimed at you.
Deception aimed at you MAY cause you to suffer from that attack upon you.
Please be very careful, and please understand that I offer my help on this march.
What is the next step?
A lot of confusion can occur when there are very good people showing each other a good way to defend against criminals, and those natural born leaders are seen as Kings among men (and women) or Queens because they earn their place among every other King and every other Queen ever to exist in human time. We are all equal according to voluntary law, some are better at showing the rest of us how to accurately identify the criminals who volunteer to be UNDER the law.
So the confusion is to see common law, natural law, structures whereby some people appear to be much better than other people at defense, as those who prove to be much better at defense appear to be on top of a Pyramid structure, as the leaders who earn their place as leaders appear to be dictating who must do this, and who must do that, without fail.
The appearance is illusory. Much deception has been invented and effectively employed by criminals (below the law by their own power of will) whereby a false defensive structure IS a pyramid structure whereby each criminal is placed into this structure by force of violence, or by threat of violence, or by force of deception.
So how is a true leader known to be one so as not to be led onto a path whereby the followers are following a false leader?
You have to be one.
Once you begin on the path of leading WITHIN a voluntary association, it becomes very obvious, quickly, who is, and who is not, volunteering to be WITHIN a voluntary association, as those who volunteer to go OUTSIDE of a voluntary association are WILLING and able to resort to deception, threats, and violence as a means of creating, and maintaining, Involuntary Association.
You have to lead.
You have to take command.
You have to see the enemy for what the enemy is, in fact, within your own mind. Rejecting the concept of dependency upon false leaders, if there is any of those deceptions remaining in your mind, and from that point on, PERHAPS, the world will no longer be confusing, and you can easily see friend from foe.
With practice, leading yourself, in defense against those who seek to destroy life, Liberty, and every good thing in life and liberty, including innocence, the concept of helping each other see their own remaining DEPENDENCE upon falsehoods, threats, and violence becomes more and more natural.
Have you ever heard someone say: "See how you are?"
If it works, then the answer to that question may be: "Thanks, now I see, so now I will not longer be my own worst enemy."
I hope that those words above help, and I hope that you can find those words useful, and I hope that my words offered voluntarily are not taken by you as any effort by me to incorporate you into an involuntary association.
Each step of the way you take in the right direction can become your testimony to others, as you inform other people about how you were once here, and now you are no longer there, now you are here, as if to say: "See how I was?"
I was once caught in the mire of falsehood.
Now I see better.
Words to the wise (offered)
Mr. President it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth - and listen to the song of the siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and to provide for it.
How to tell friend from foe?
Summary?
Those who lie to you are hardest to see. They are not your friends.
Those who threaten you, you must do this, you must do that, or else: are not your friends.
Those who violently attack innocent people, obviously, are not friends.
The most confusing part of this is the confusion generated by people who are misled with false notions. When they lie they themselves believe the lie.
Voluntary association is the answer.
Here is more proof:
In peace
From the day on which an accommodation takes place between England and America, on any other terms than as independent States, I shall date the ruin of this country. a politic minister will study to lull us into security by granting us the full extent of our petitions. The warm sunshine of influence would melt down the virtue which the violence of the storm rendered more firm and unyielding. In a state of tranquillity, wealth, and luxury, our descendants would forget the arts of war and the noble activity and zeal which made their ancestors invincible. Every art of corruption would be employed to loosen the bond of union which renders our resistance formidable. When the spirit of liberty, which now animates our hearts and gives success to our arms, is extinct, our numbers will accelerate our ruin and render us easier victims to tyranny. Ye abandoned minions of an infatuated ministry, if peradventure any should yet remain among us, remember that a Warren and Montgomery are numbered among the dead. Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say, What should be the reward of such sacrifices? Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship, and plow, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom--go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!
Note: "We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you."
That is an offer. That is voluntary association in the face of a horrible army of criminal invaders running amok throughout this country perpetrating horrible crimes upon the innocent, and yet the individual remains convinced of the power of Voluntary Association.
That is starkly contrasted against the opposite message whereby someone demands blind obedience to falsehood without question, which is my way of describing the essence of an Involuntary Association.