 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
There may be great difficulty in this present effort by me to convey how the gap is filled in between the concept of PEERS (as in a jury of your peers) and the concept of Surplus Wealth, because much of my understanding is foreign to most people, but not foreign to people like Josiah Warren who wrote Equitable Commerce.
I can try to convey the information in a manner that can be understood by anyone having an interest in doing so.
It can be understood that babies cannot be among the group of peers.
Why?
If the accurate reason why babies can't be among the group of peers is the reasoning that babies are dependent not independent, then that understanding can help in bridging the gap between PEERS and Surplus Wealth.
It can be understood that criminals who actively refuse to obey common law (based upon Natural Law and/or God's Law) cannot be among the group of peers.
If the accurate reason can be understood to be the same reason, whereby criminals are dependent upon surviving by stealing from those who have things worth stealing, then that understanding can also help.
It can be understood that insane people cannot be among the group of peers.
Again dependency, or lack of a command of whatever power must be commanded for a member of the peers to be independent is required.
What is a measure of independence, and therefore a measure of not being dependent?
If it can be understood that a measure of independence is the capacity to produce more of the life sustaining things over and above the consumption of the life sustaining things, then the individual, independent, power to survive alone (if necessary) is proven as a fact of nature, and a measure of capacity to be a member of the peers.
An independent person does not NEED (have an interest in) feeding off of other people as a dependent would be so constituted, or inclined by Nature (the survival instinct), such as a baby needing nourishing parents or a reasonable facsimile, an insane person, or a criminal having no other skills (or inclination) to do anything other than crime (destruction NOT production).
NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST AMONG PEERS
The measure of production that is left over after consumption is what it is, it is what it is, in each individual case where an individual, working alone, produces more than the individual consumes, and a term for that amount of production above consumption is Surplus Wealth.
Who owns Surplus Wealth when an individual works alone, and there is no contact whatsoever with any other individual anywhere?
Who controls the entire sum of Surplus Wealth, or a FUND of Surplus Wealth, when there is only one human being alive on the planet, or when an individual is completely separate from anyone else?
Naturally, as a matter of fact, the obvious answer is that the individual, with the exception of Natural forces such as drought, or flood, controls the use, or the abuse, of the FUND that is made up of the Surplus Wealth produced by that individual alone.
That would be a PEER measured by another PEER. That would be a targeted victim measured by a criminal.
The PEER is measured by the fact that the PEER is not dependent, and instead of being dependent the PEER is measurably independent, as the PEER is fully capable of survival alone without any measure of help or hindrance by any other human being anywhere.
If there is no injury (hindrance) by anyone upon anyone else, ever, then there is no such thing as man made law whereby man made law is something invented by man so as to defend against criminal men (or women).
The problem is not babies, or dependents, or old people, nor is the problem the mere fact that some people go insane.
The problem is that some people target other people and consume other people as a profession, a way of life, and then the problem becomes hell on earth when insane people counterfeit government, and the insane people take over the FUND, and the insane people dictate how the FUND is consumed as each individual producer adds to the FUND.
The PROBLEM is such that the insane people use the FUND to consume those people who add to the FUND, and therefore the PROBLEM is literally a form a cannibalism.
So who, if any one can, will be able to address, and overcome, the PROBLEM, as the insane people among us have taken over the power of (defensive) government and they are now consuming all the people who actually constitute the measure of that FUND?
The PEERS fill up the FUND, while the criminals consume the FUND in the work required to make slaves of all the PEERS.
Who can defend Liberty?
The obvious answer to who can overcome the Dictatorial Powers (using power stolen to steal ever more power) is the same people who actually use power to make more power out of less power, or, in other words, the only people that can defend Liberty (overpower the Dictatorial Powers or Legal Criminals) are those PEERS.
As soon as one of the PEERS reaches for unearned income (taking from the FUND and not giving up anything into the FUND and doing so by deception, threat of aggressive violence, or violence: known as crime) is the moment one of the PEERS volunteers to step into criminal shoes, and by that measure, is no longer a PEER.
The FUND can be merely an abstract understanding that there are many PEERS and each one has an individual FUND under their exclusive control, and the total number of FUNDS controlled by the total number of PEERS happens to be the total POWER commanded by that number of PEERS in that place on Earth.
Are we in a place on Earth that is constituted of Criminals with Badges who control every red cent of Surplus Wealth produced by the slaves?
Or are we PEERS who understand the necessity of adding to the FUND that is constituted by our surplus wealth that we produce and that we do not allow criminals to gain control over, so as to ensure that IT, our Surplus Wealth, and our POWER, is not used UPON US, or AGAINST US, to Enslave us?
Common Sense?
Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer.
No, unfortunately, the FUND is being spent on making damn sure that the slaves remain slaves, and therefore the slaves, almost to the man, and almost to the woman, are under a spell whereby almost every one of them BELIEVE that Federal Reserve Notes is the only way to measure THE FUND.
If the slaves don't figure it out soon, they will soon know that the Legal Criminals who produce Federal Reserve Notes are going out of business and the new BELIEF in the new FRAUD made Legal will be the same Money Monopoly Power with a different name, and a different color on the money.
So the PEERS ought to figure it out before it is too late.
Does one PEER ever demand from another PEER a measure of tribute?
Hey you, I order you to pay me tribute, and you must do so, and you cannot question the payment?
How far from Liberty?
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
Real Time