 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
I am changing the size of the text from 12 to 14 where your words are published in a font called Angsana. I can't read the size 12 font without much effort or glasses while I have no trouble reading the words published sized 10 New Times Roman (my words).
Size 14 Angsana is still smaller in actual size compared to size 10 New Times Roman.
I hate that I have sent the book back to you with "busy" work to be done.
I think you can change all of that font size at one time though by highlighting a paragraph of the Angsana font and then
at the right side of your screen (at the top) in the editing segment of the toolbar click on
Select
then on the drop down click on
All Text with the Similar Formatting
Then all the Angsana will be automatically highlighted in a few seconds and then just change the font size.
-----------------------
Joe, why do the JBS people and the G. Edward Griffin videos not call out Hamilton and Madison and the Federalist papers?
It seems I just want to find one enemy, but there are many as the criminals morph and worm their way in.
Do you think the criminals used US and the Soviet fronts to play the good cop bad cop routine?
Did you know that we (the United States, the criminals in power in The united States)
left the Yugoslavian Nationalists high and dry after calling them out on the Voice of America (or some radio program, I can't remember if that is the right name) and telling them that we would help them and then once they got brave enough to help themselves we didn't help them. We sent them a planeload of powdered milk. I am saying we, but you know what I mean. I know you and I didn't do that. But then again, our tax dollars were used to do that.
It seems to me that the criminals have used the United States to identify opposition to Communism and then the Communist Criminals crush that opposition while "the good cops" withdraw support.
Did you know that Chiang Kai-shek was told to have a collision government with Mao and when he would not do so his ammunition supply was stopped.
---------------------
You are safer, I suppose, in your delusion, as to what they are, and who they are, in fact, without the false labels. I may not be as safe and secure since my viewpoint may be more accurate. Does that make any sense to you?
If I am not misdirected by the kangaroo labels then any effort on my part in defense is added to a more effective defense against the actual criminals; so the actual criminals are then able to view me as a higher threat, while you are still busy chasing your own tail?
If is just that everytime, I think I finally understand, I see something new. William Cooper was busy calling out the Masons as the culprits, not the only culprits, but he was highlighting them in his Mystery Babylon series. So, then I was seeing/understanding the "spiritual" war or the spiritual energy the the legal criminals use.
Now the last couple of days I have been listening to Griffin and JBS videos and they are busy talking about Soviet Subversion. They seem to use Soviet and Communist interchangeably. Do you think they are the same thing? Griffin, I think also talked about the Lawyers Guild. Do you know about them?
I just want to see everything at once plainly, but I think I remember you telling me that we will probably never know the name of the worse criminal (and that we probably would rather not look to close because of the disgusting evil deeds surrounding that/those person(s).) You have also told me that they knock each other off as they try to gain the most power. You seem to point mostly to the money side of the enemy.
Did you know the olympics generate money into the US economy when the hosting country begins to ramp up for the event? It seems to me that maybe the foreign aid that we give out comes back in part as purchases from US companies. Do you know about that?
I think I am pretty naive. I have toilet paper vision. But Joe, sometimes when you try to help me see the big picture it makes me wonder why you seem to knee jerk when I use certain labels for certain criminals.
I don't know what you think is, or is not, a Fabian Socialist.
I don't know what you think is, or is not, Utopian thinking.
I don't know either, I was just parroting what I heard in a video.
So, by my imagination, I can take your words as an attack upon me, as I am quite possibly a utopian thinker, a person who thinks that air is collectively owned by everyone, and therefore I am a socialist, I have that dagger in my hand, and I may be misled by other utopian, collectivist, communist, socialist, thinkers who are better able to stab people with that dagger behind that cloak?
I think the appropriate view of air ownership is this:
Psalms 24:1 1 The earth is the LORD'S, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein
Maybe people should quit trying to own things?
Jesus said this in Luke 3:
10 And the people asked him, saying, What shall we do then? 11 He [Jesus] answereth and saith unto them, He that hath two coats, let him impart to him that hath none; and he that hath meat, let him do likewise.
Joe, I have more than 2 coats, there are people who have none. I have plenty of meat, there are people who have none. I say that I am a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ. I do not follow those words because if I did, my closet would not be bulging with choices, even if my choices came from Walmart. There are people with no choices. Sure, I give to others, but I give lots to myself.
I wonder, how that concept of only having what the day requires works with this:
Romans 12:21 KJV
Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
What if all who had plenty gave willingly to those who had none, could that action in any way end the fed, end the irs and bring the troops home?
What if people were satisfied with food and clothes, and that only to the extent to meet the need? Perhaps the IRS would have nothing to tax.
In that same passage in Luke 3, Jesus said this to too:
14 And the soldiers likewise demanded of him [Jesus], saying, And what shall we do? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any falsely; and be content with your wages.
What if the soldiers had followed that direction? Jesus would not have been beaten and put on cross?
I am a utopian dreamer. [too?]