 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
modified as follows:
Your grandchild may be setting a fine example, if it does not get too hot, if he does not wither, and if he does not become like the pod people - one of them, I mean, without any ambiguity - one of those people who share the lie that THINGS are accountable for the actions of people.
There is a use of single, not double dash, and without going back to find double dashes in past sentences, to compare, I am not able to understand the reasoning. Since you are current in this work, and since you appear to have -- in mind -- reasons for going back to single dashes only, then your decision may be based upon specific reasons that lean toward that decision for those reasons.
I would not worry about it, at all, and if there is inspiration to go forward, or back, then go forward, or back, as if finding a challenge, meeting that challenge, and then offering a workable competitive solution to that challenge in time and space.
Like gardening, I suppose, there are no good things to eat before you met the challenge, and the proof of the validity of your offered solution is, in fact, things to eat. Who is to say those things to eat are good or not?