 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
If the game Monopoly was combined with the game Risk what would the skills being developed be with that combination?
I believe in my editing work yesterday, I came across the answer to that question:
"No different than dressing up as Indians, slaughtering White Settlers, and blaming the slaughter of White Settlers on the neighboring Indians in order to slaughter the Indians to then take over control of the land that is occupied by the Indians." --Joe Kelley
i.e. money interest combined with military interest used by Legal Criminals...except some of their crimes are not Legal, but very well covered up, as in dressed up in costume...and the innocent white settlers and the innocent native Indians pay the cost as they are made scarce so that a new crop of white settlers and marauders can be fostered and reaped for a scarce gain. -- bear
And add lib words from Joe coming to the front of bear's memory: What if all the money sunk into scarcity was directed towards investments in abundance?
OK Joe, now bear must get to work. I am sorry the 1776 thing didn't work out. But what I am not understanding is what difference does it make whether people talk back or make comments? Maybe seeds are planted. Maybe those seeds take hold and form new thought patterns in the readers. You may never personally know the benefit of your words left as seeds, but if people benefit, what difference does it make if it is one-way communication? Or maybe I am not understanding correctly.