 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Canon 1939 By definition, Divinity or Divine Rights of Use cannot exist without the existence of a Divine Trust. Therefore, no valid True Trust may exist unless it is connected and created from a valid Divine Trust.
The thinking there, as far as I can tell, is such that the Roman Cult, or the current people I call Legal Criminals, claim to get their authority from where they claim to get their authority, and that chain of command goes from whichever Legal Criminal is lower in authority to whichever Legal Criminal is higher in authority according to each one along the way in that chain of command.
Then, the idea is to become your own authority, and base your claim of authority on something that will be shared by enough people to constitute a POWER of defense that is more POWERFUL than Legal Crime.
The thinking goes on to think that the Legal Criminals, themselves, have been known to claim, in their own laws, that their authority is derived from The Creator, or God, or this, or that, along the same lines, again SHARED, as in an AGREEMENT, as to where authority goes when it goes up to the TOP of the chain of authority.
Take me to your leader.
That is the thinking.
If a lesser power authority intends to cause injury to an innocent person, also known as crime, but in this case it is crime made legal, then the targeted victim may access a defense of this nature, whereby a counter-offer is recognized by the aggressor/attacker/criminal with or without the badge.
The Legal Criminal says that you owe him, or her, so pay up, and don't question the order to pay up.
What does the targeted victim do in any case?
That is the thinking in Principle, in my own words.
As to how Frank O'Collins words the communications intending to help victims avoid being victims, there are many words, including True Trust.
So the concept of saying the BOSS is God, and no one is above that BOSS, is the basis of this Divine Trust idea.
Next down the food chain of authority is, I suppose, this idea called a True Trust, but again, in context, what is the competition offered by Legal Criminals concerning which Trust, which definition, which authority, is more POWERFUL in any case?
If Legal Criminals offer a Legal Fiction whereby the Legal Criminals claim that Legal Criminals own the targeted victim, then is that a good idea for the targeted victim to accept that offer?
This is exactly the same thing as giving up your guns to someone who will obviously be even more powerful to make you give them more, and you will obviously be less powerful to defend against them after you obey that order without question.
Again the concept of providing the means by which we suffer is a POWER transfer.
Why make yourself weaker so that those who make you weaker can make you even weaker?
It is called the race to the bottom. Look at the Prisoner's Dilemma Applet and see what happens when the RULE is conflict and the exception is cooperation.
What happens to the rats when the ship starts sinking?
The rats eat each other while they continue to eat holes through the hull of the boat, so the ship sinks faster, and that is the Law of diminishing returns.
Invest in crime made legal, for fun and profit, and what do you expect will be the end result over time?