View single post by Jee-Host[gm]
 Posted: Sun Jun 9th, 2013 02:27 am
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Jee-Host[gm]

 

Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
 >>> My guess is that you think that you are answering a question previously asked, and I can't find the previously asked question.

It was in fact an answer - an answer to your particular suggestion about particular relation to math in a particular way I understood your particular use of said word. So - no was to that. But anyway - this is just me using red lettering again, much like there.

Math in itself is not a pre-existing idea in reality. Otherwise it would suggest a typical unjustifiable 'creator'. So in a way there is no 'absolute math', because that math is way to describe how everything works which requires knowledge of everything. Math as a language has a very specific purpose. And - you guessed it - using it outside of said purpose compromises the language. Yet it's not that easy to spot. Use of statistics for deception is not what I meant - it's kinda trivial compared to what we talked about in music thread, don't you think?

>>> the process of lying can cause the liar to be victim to their own lies

We almost at a complete agreement here. Just change 'can cause' to 'causes' (undoubtedly, inevitably, inescapably, immediately) and that's it.

>>> Your words are therefore proof to me that I can certainly use your generous help.

I can do that, as long as you specify what you need in a more more narrow fashion. I'm not sure if that is asking too much for comfort.

>>> I find it funny, or odd, there is probably a better words somewhere, as to what your words claim to be my thoughts, since much of the time it appears as if your estimate of my thoughts are often opposite of my thought as I know my thoughts to be

I find it funny that I don't ever claim your thoughts, or to know them. But I have to account for possibilities, don't I? And that requires writing as I do. Though I don't go guns blazing about it - don't have enough patience for that. I suggest that when you feel that I say that I can read your mind and whatnot - you mentally redact that and react to the message without all of those cases first. Then apply possibilities.