 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
If you are willfully acting in defense against such threats, and if it is a common sense thing to do, then other people are also willfully acting in defense against such threats.
What is the common denominator common to all people who are willfully acting in defense against attacks being made by attackers who attack from a position of false authority?
I am working with English words right now, showing one competitive example of how an individual acts in defense against accurately measurable threats that originate from people who are attacking from positions of false authority.
I am not alone, if you are reading this, chances are that you are not seeking to join those who threaten, chances are you are not one of the few who claim to be right as they threaten from positions of false authority, so chances are you are as I am, as many of us are, which is, we, we the targeted, We The People, who are being attacked by those few who are hiding behind false authority.
That leads into Episode 6, where the speaker speaking in a sound file is offering a competitive defensive system by which the targets collectively find remedy, as if to say, hey, you are not alone, and We The People can combine our individual defensive Power and We The People can become more defensively Powerful than the sum of our individual parts.
Here is the link to Episode 6:
http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-90342/TS-429440.mp3
A caller asks a question at Time 1:04 concerning the systematic defense against attacks being made by false authorities, and the caller offers a question concerning who claims to be The Boss of those who attack us.
I can comment on that, but who would listen?
bear may respond, I don't know.
The person questioning the speaker in Episode 6 sounds (not is) like Walter Burien, and that person questioning comments on another group of We The People who are defending our Liberty, and so I looked and found this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp-mnivAPTM
Private and Public Trust Explained - Creditors in Commerce
It may be a good time, right here and now, to link again the efforts by Walter Burien to Blow The Whistle on those who attack us from behind false authority:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkwjtbTjTsE
In the Episode 6 audio file the questions concerning those people who claim to be The Boss of those who attack us from behind false authority is not answered.
I think it is understandable, reasonable, to ask who is The Boss of the people who attack us from behind false authority.
A misleading answer is a way of accurately measuring the actual problem.
1.
End The FED
2.
End The IRS
3.
Bring the Troops Home (be the troops at home)
4.
Do so by July 4th 2013, be there, or be square.
I spoke too soon, listening further in Episode 6 there is an answer to the question offered, and it is an answer that has become a very common term used to Label The Boss of those who attack us from behind false authority.
Time 1:19: or so is mentioned the Story of the Scorpion and The Frog
Scorpion and Frog Fable
Time 2:12: or so there is mention of the financing of sin, whereby claims of ownership, are false, and therefore the idea, I suppose, from a Legal Criminal viewpoint, is to invest into, and then profit from, all the conflicts that arise from manipulating that lie into general usage.
From an old Jewish axiom (Philo?): "Good man is free, evil man is a slave to possessions. "
From Creditors in Commerce I found David Wynn Miller on the subject of Language here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgcW6Hzn46w
That appears to be, so far in the first minutes, worth listening to, and that began with a request to find the missing parts of that presentation. Language is crucial for cooperation to work. False language is necessary for crime to work.
"Everyone understands a performance contract."
Find out how to speak accurately?
http://dwmlc.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgcW6Hzn46w
Time: 3:40:56
Signing documents?
Competitive strategies fighting Legal Crime?
A.
Ecclesiastic Deed Polls (No Dishonor or do not sign Documents produced by the Judges/Prosecutors/Clerks)
B.
Quantum Grammar (Sign on top of Stamps)
Time: 4:26. on
The words spoken at that time begin, in my opinion to confess the speaker to be someone parroting the falsehoods of over-population with the falsehoods therefore creating a supposed need to kill off very large numbers of people.