 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
Added words provided via email. Currently the page count has moved from 174 to 175. Perhaps if I don't have pagecount resolved before sending the book back to you, you will be able to resolve it back to 175. The words in red are the words that have been added:
Gold bugs? What is the meaning of that? Gold is fine, very good, but very expensive money when adding up the costs associated with crime prevention. It may not be a good idea to carry around pockets full of Gold in crime infested waters, advertising the fact, “Hey, look here, I'm ripe for the plucking…having and holding large amounts of very launderable money.”
Real cash, if not the stuff needed for Tax Liabilities?
So the competition is really bad, you know, that fraudulent stuff used by very bad criminals who steal the law power, and then make it a crime to use any other money. “Where is my washing machine?”
“Really bad things, those paper dollars, bad, bad, evil, evil, paper, the scourge of the earth, that paper, that, that, worthless, worthless paper?”
Do you see? That is a parody on the Austrian Economist Dogma. Fiat currency is bad, so bad, and if it is so bad, why are you using it to such great effect?
The False Capitalists are as easy to spot as the False Socialists. Why? They are both false. They want to launder something. They want to keep their ill-gotten gains well hidden, and how are you going to do so unless you have available a washing machine whereby the evidence of having gained your power working in concert with the rats, pigs, scoundrels, or mammon, whatever, soils the money, marks the money, as blood, or dirt, is on the money, and therefore there is a desire to wash the evidence off the money.
If the idea is to keep the evidence of an exchange from the Tax Collector, a case can be made that it is an innocent person working to avoid having their earnings stolen by the big bad wolf, but is that the same big bad wolf that is called whenever a problem arises during a loss of property at the hands of known criminals?
So what is it, exactly, since I'm receiving mixed messages here: either the paper is worthless or it is evil, and it can't be both can it?
Re-organized/Edited/Punctuated to this:
Gold bugs? Really bad things, those paper dollars, bad, bad, evil, evil, paper, the scourge of the earth, that paper, that, that, worthless, worthless paper? What is the meaning of that? Gold is fine, very good, but very expensive money when adding up the costs associated with crime prevention. It may not be a good idea to carry around pockets full of Gold in crime infested waters, advertising the fact, “Hey, look here, I'm ripe for the plucking…having and holding large amounts of very launderable money.”
Real cash, if not the stuff needed for Tax Liabilities?
So the competition is really bad, you know, that fraudulent stuff used by very bad criminals who steal the law power, and then make it a crime to use any other money. Where is my washing machine?
Do you see? That is a parody on the Austrian Economist Dogma. Fiat currency is bad, so bad, and if it is so bad, why are you using it to such great effect?
The False Capitalists are as easy to spot as the False Socialists. Why? They are both false. They want to launder something. They want to keep their ill-gotten gains well hidden. How are they going to do so unless they have available a washing machine whereby the evidence of having gained their power working in concert with the rats, pigs, scoundrels, or mammon…whatever soils the money or marks the money…as blood or dirt…is on the money…and there is, therefore, a desire to wash the evidence off the money.
If the idea is to keep the evidence of an exchange from the Tax Collector, a case can be made that it is an innocent person working to avoid having their earnings stolen by the big bad wolf, but is that the same big bad wolf that is called whenever a problem arises during a loss of property at the hands of known criminals?
So what is it, exactly, since I'm receiving mixed messages here: either the paper is worthless or it is evil, and it can't be both can it?