 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
While I am reading about this very large geographical area, knowable as Russia, and the leadership of many people in Russia working to stop escalation of destruction (so called war) for profit, it occurs to me to think that Legal Criminals could not allow such a defensive POWER to exists, because accurate moral human peaceful coexistence, or harmony, if known, and if known by enough people, ends Legal Crime, so the Legal Criminals must have figured out the need to CRUSH the leadership of Russia based upon those efforts by that leadership to spread the ideas of peaceful human coexistence.
Hey, it was a suggestion by Mike (kurtwaters) for me to avoid distracting the progress of Russian History, here, but I do see opportunity to comment, and these comments of mine can be erased at will.
“Also there were agreements about financing Japanese government in their war against Russian government in their attempt to weaken monarchy and by that ease the Bolshevik’s task. In new York: Jacob Schiff, J.P. Morgan, First National Bank, National City Bank provided Japan with 30.000.000$ to attack Russian government from the East”.
I am wondering about the use of the quote above in the context of History up to that point. The Legal Criminals, as I call them, financed Japanese aggression, which makes sense to me, "what else is new", but my question here has to do with the "Bolshevik's" existing in the time frame where Nikolai II is still commanding Russian government and economy. I thought that the Bolsheviks were not in power (financed by Legal Criminals from "Wall Street") until after Nickolai II was overpowered (enemies domestic being financed by enemies foreign,) so I'd like clarification in this timeline.
Were the Bolsheviks in power while Nicolai II was in power?
OH, never mind, I read further and found that the quote in question leads into the subsequent text.
Note: I use Google Maps when I read the names of places like Sarov in the Russian History text, and an observation of the scale, and position, of Russia becomes obviously a very large place of like minded people (all are Russian people in one way or another) and it is also a large place that is much more North compared to where I live in California.
If I make California zoomed in on Google maps, so that California fills the Computer screen, then I move the Map (without changing the zoom) to the West, then to the North I find a lot of room in Russia where California, which is not a small State, can be placed, California can be placed, inside of Russia without taking up much room in Russia.
Russia is HUGE!
“If England and Japan are going to act together – they can crush Russia, but they have [to] move quickly, otherwise Russians will became too strong”.
H ewas also strong-willed
regular military forces date back to 186 and 1807 in Aniva Bay.
I have another question about the use of the word "Soviet."
In Soviet times common way to describe these events was to say that “In the Far East there was a confrontation of two imperialistic predators – Russia and China”. We’ll talk about Japan’s samurai spirit-soaked aggression a bit later. But for now we are interested in myth about Russian aggression. Let’s analyze it.
My question has to do with the meaning of the word Soviet and if it a label that is synonymous with Bolshevik, so as to understand "Soviet times" as being the times when the Bolshevik Regime was in Power, and it was not the time when Nicolai II was in power?