 |
Full Topic |  |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
I didn't come here to talk to myself or convince myself in anything all by myself - all of that I can do on my own without taking the time to write it down. All I say in this thread is directed to you and only you. Please don't "perceive" my English as your own, including your own talking habits. I thought we have already established that we are not on the same page in terms of language.
So I suppose I should stop my "preaching", since I get the impression that you're not getting what I mean at all.
Does that makes sense?
In any case, I've explained my point and answered your question to the best of my ability. Whatever it is that is lacking in one or both of us to interpolate what I write and what you perceive, changes nothing about the nature of perception - process that doesn't account for everything, therefore can never be absolute until everything is known and taken into account.
On a side note - let's have a test of imagination. Try and make a verbal description of how would you imagine a place with fractional value of number of dimensions. Let's say, instead of mainstream 3 dimensions let it be 3.14 dimensions. I'm only asking this to asses if that is where the problem of our mutual misunderstanding lies. Should be easy enough of an obstacle to overcome for you. At the very least that would be some interesting data for me to learn about your thought-process. If you don't want to do this - I don't mind, but don't expect me to continue this game about your notion when you seem to just pretend that I didn't make any moves.
Last edited on Sat Apr 13th, 2013 07:04 pm by