 |
Full Topic |  |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
But I'll try to rephrase a little bit.
There are things that one knows. there are things that one does not know. To have a grasp at reality one should account for things he has no idea about. Yet, technically, admitting possibility of their existence in already a certain information about those things. Thus one is no longer completely in the dark. You say 'perception' undoubtedly meaning some clear definition that you have in your mind, an image that corresponds to that word for you. Think about how exactly you acquire said image. Perceiving the idea of perception in itself is a process. But however you perform said process, whatever means you use to do that, you have to account for any other possible means. Means that are incredibly difficult to grasp because they don't exist in your perceptional process. Thus they are no longer a part of perception or perceiving. One may say that any processing of data is perceiving, but the loophole still remains the same. Do you understand what I mean? There is a possibility of more than one accounts for. And until that possibility is accounted for and everything is known - no 'absolute' truth is gained in such a status.