 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
No, I am now seeing that same dot connecting (or similar dot connecting) as I read Sergey's Russian History.
Please do me a favor in your use of the words proletariat and bourgeoisie: explain what those words mean.
As in:
"That would mean that the western financial interests (Legal Criminals) used the east European proletariat (non-tax payers) to exploit the east European bourgeoisie (tax payers) so that the western bourgeoisie (tax payers) could have dominion or at least no competition."
I find those terms to be misleading, ambiguous, and even willfully deceptive.
I prefer to measure people and then place people in groups based upon their capacity to produce more at the end of the day then what existed at the beginning of the day, and that "class" of people constitute the source of economic power, and therefore that "class" of people are the targets that are targeted by any criminal "class" of people.
It is also understandable, measurable, and accurately measurable, to note that those who do produce more than they have are honest and equitable people, for the POWER required to access division of labor, specialization, and economies of scale, is TRUST.