 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
From Tucker, back to Andrews on Proudhon is a sentence written by Andrews where Andrews mentions the Law of Three States.
So...I look that up and find this:
Law of Three
Jumping down to this:
The Three Gunas - Rajas, Tamas, Sattva.
These are three states, or conditions, of the soul, made evident on the mental plane in the self-conscious mind.In the Sattvic state, the mind is intent upon goodness and truth, wisdom and love. This condition leads to the evolution of the higher (the buddhic) emotions, and to the Ideals (state of gods).
In the Rajasic state, the mind is full of outgoing energy towards the acquisition of objects of sense, knowledge, fame, power, ambition, social benefit, etc. This condition leads to the evolution of the mental faculties in their widest range (state of men) and to the intuition of truth.
In the Tamasic state the mind is sluggish, unaroused, stupid, ignorant and without zest in the pursuit of any worthy objects. This condition leads to the evolution of the desires, passions, and appetites (state of beasts).
According to Manu, Sattva (goodness) has the form of knowledge, and induces a deep calm full of bliss, and a pure light. Rajas (activity) has the form of love and hatred, and induces pain and dissatisfaction, and an activity difficult to conquer, which draws embodied souls to the objects of sense. Tamas (darkness) has the form of ignorance, and is coupled with delusion unfathomed by reasoning.
Every actionis really performed by the gunas. Man, deluded by his egoism, thinks: "I am the doer." But he who has the true insight into the operations of the gunas and their various functions, knows that when senses attach themselves to objects, gunas are merely attaching themselves to gunas. (Bhagavad Gita)
Particularly this:
"Tamas (darkness) has the form of ignorance, and is coupled with delusion unfathomed by reasoning."
Back to my Political Economy: Those who are the most powerful among us, gain that power by targeting those who produce, stealing the surplus production, then use that stolen power to steal more, and one thing that they buy with that stolen loot is counterfeit guidance.
The few most powerful are guiding the sheep, so to speak, into the slaughter house.
How?
They wash our brains.
How?
Going back to John Taylor Gatto, to find the methods to the madness, are two lists, and those two lists explain how the most powerful among us train their own selves so as to then be in positions to train the targets according to the other list.
The first list is how the few most powerful among us EMPOWER themselves with genuine productive guidance.
Here
The first list is the list used at the most private schools where most of the most powerful people are guided.
The second list is the list used by the most powerful people, handed down from the authorities to the vassals, so that the victims remain victims - those people you so often see in your daily routine.
My point, and I keep on pointing this out to bear, the other person on this Forum, that it is a very effective lie, infecting almost everyone, that men are bad.
Those people in your cabs are not torturing and mass murdering for fun and profit.
Who is?
There are millions of people being tortured - legally.
Are they asking for it?
There are millions of people being murdered - legally.
Are they asking for it?
Does the order, and the paycheck, flowing to the legal torturers and murderers happen by accident?
I have this book written by Nicola Machiavelli and in the preface there is an explanation of ONE possible meaning of "Men are Bad" please see if it fits somewhere.
The Prince
Machiavelli's outlook was darkly pessimistic; the one element of St Augustine's thought which he wholeheartedly endorsed was the idea of original sin. As he puts it starkly in the same chapter 18 of The Prince, men are bad. This means that to deal with them as if they were good, honourable or trustworthy is to court disaster. In the Discourses (I,3) the point is repeated: 'all men are bad and are ever ready to display their malignity'. This must be the initial premise of those who play to found a republic. The business of politics is to try and salvage something positive from this unpromising conglomerate, and the aim of the state is to check those anarchic drives which are a constant threat to the common good. This is where The Prince fits into the spectrum of his wider thought: while a republic may be his preferred form of social organization, the crucial business of founding or restoring a state can only be performed by one exceptional individual.
The most powerful among us (Legal Criminals) know how to effectively subject the targets to powerful brainwashing/response conditioning/behavioral modification/false advertizments/deceptions/lies/misdirections to a point where the subjects are rendered powerless, as if the subjects are stuck in an animalistic state.
A good study for this type of POWER (power of mass mind) is Edward Bernays who has been called The Father of Spin.
The Father of Spin
Where did Edward Bernays go to school?