View single post by bear
 Posted: Sat Dec 8th, 2012 10:32 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
bear

 

Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Joe's Law goes like this:

Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.

http://www.dailypaul.com/232137/joes-law :

The Fight for Liberty: http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/PanelTw

Many people may not understand the power struggle being fought as in that link as Ron Paul spearheads defensive action against the offenses perpetrated by the group of people known collectively as The FED.

A concept called Joe's Law can help in unraveling the very large web of deceit that covers up the crimes perpetrated by The FED group.

Joe's Law goes like this:

Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.

That is one sentence, in English, and it is an explanation of Political Economy and it can be used to answer the types of questions tabled in the link where Ron Paul is fighting against Legal Crime.

Question (asked in the hearing televised live):

1.
Do you think that the FED SHOULD be abolished?

If you are at all uncertain as to the right answer to that question, having any doubt whatsoever as to the right answer to that question, then please consider employing Joe's (Political Economy) Law to remove even the slightest shadow of doubt as to the right answer to that question.

The FED produces Legal Purchasing Power and therefore the question asked is a question concerning the legal license to produce Legal Purchasing Power.

Purchasing Power is Purchasing Power with or without the legal license, Purchasing Power is the Power to Purchase and that is an accurately measurable fact.

Rephrasing the question is necessary in the effort to make sense of it in the context of reasonable Political Economy.

First listen to the question asked and then listen to a rephrasing of the question so as to make sense of the question in such a way as to allow for a reasonable answer (removing ambiguity):

1a.
Do you think that the fed SHOULD be abolished?

1b.
Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished?

The reader may be confused even more after reading the revision of the original question, until, the reader now uses the revision in conjunction with Joe's Law as such:

Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while legal purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.

Do you think that there is a difference between regular purchasing power and legal purchasing power, and if you don't think there is a difference between regular purchasing power and legal purchasing power then it may be a good idea to figure out if there is a difference.

If there is a Central Bank by any name, such as The FED, then that fact is documented as fact on a legal account of legal purchasing power.

Take that Central Bank away, abolish it, and there is no legal purchasing power account, there may still be an account, but not legal.

What does the FED PRODUCE?

Does the FED produce wisdom?

Does the FED produce wealth?

Does the FED produce productive employment?

Does the FED produce a stable economy?

Does the FED produce a dual mandate?

Take away all the false window dressing, or pull back the curtain that hides the Wizard of Oz, and what is the accurate, indisputable, answer to the question?

What does the FED produce?

Counterfeit Money.

If it were not counterfeit then The FED would be producing wealth, actual wealth, actual power to purchase, and they would not need an army to enforce the value of it, as their money would be as valuable with, or without, the army backing it up.

Instead of a number of buildings filled with people at computers The FED would be a number of buildings filled with people producing powerful things, things of wealth, such as anything, anywhere, where money is needed to get these things that are things known as wealth.

The FED does not produce wealth, therefore the things that The FED does produce is something other than wealth, yet the LAW enforces what The FED produces as if what The FED produces is wealth, which is demonstrably not wealth.

How can it be demonstrated, beyond a shadow of doubt, that The FED produces counterfeit wealth, counterfeit purchasing power, or counterfeit money?

Take away the army that is used to enforce the requirement to use the stuff that The FED produces and see if anyone still uses it.

1b.
Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished?

The answer is demonstrably, unequivocally, matter of factually: yes.

It is, in fact, abolishing itself.

Why wait?

Way wait around for those who insist that it (The FED) is necessary to be shown that they are wrong, or that they may be lying on purpose (criminals), or that they may merely be stupid (duped), why wait for them to be proven to be the fools that they are, why wait for them to be proven to be criminals, and why wait around for those who profit from it (The FED) to use it (The FED) to steal as much as they can before they dump it, jump the sinking ship that they sunk on purpose, for something even more criminal, such as another World Reserve Currency Cabal run out of China, or some other place?

Why wait?

The reason for waiting concerns the collective power of falsehood shared by the ignorant victims.

If all the victims knew better they would stop being victims, they would not wait, and they would suddenly, and irrevocably, choose a more powerful option.

Like this:

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
Henry Ford

Instead of hearings, and even instead of court cases, the former victims would be inventing, producing, and employing forms of competitive purchasing power rather than being forced by effective deceit, and instead of being forced by effective threats of violence, and instead of being forced by effective violence targeting the competitors, into the use of the one Counterfeit Money Produced by The FED.

In the effort to remove even a shadow of doubt as to the right answer to the question...

Which question?

1b.
Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished?

In the effort to remove even a shadow of doubt as to the right answer to that question I offer Joe's Law:

Power produced into oversupply...

Counterfeit power does not actually produce power.

The opposite is true, as counterfeit power produces nothing of actual value, so words can be added to remove any remaining shadows of doubt:

Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of power...

That means: So much wealth being produced by so many productive people that the limits of abundance of wealth is allowed to happen instead of limits placed on the production of productive power being enforced by criminals who profit by using the power they steal to eliminate all competition (producers of competitive power - actual power).

The Legal Criminals must make sure that no one else gains more power they their own small network of sociopaths. That is demonstrable fact, and those facts are actually well recorded in the documents that those criminals produce, in fact, but on a more principled account, the logic, and reason, of Power can remove all doubt about the right answer to the question.

Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of Productive Power...

That means: As more and more people are free to compete in the work that does effectively produce more wealth, more things of value, more actual value, more actual productive power, as more and more production is produced, the result of all that "economy" is a reduction in the price of all that "economy", as fewer people have nothing and more people have plenty, the stuff of value goes down in price, as a matter of fact, in reality.

Here is the part where Politics enter reality in the form of money:

Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of Productive Power WHILE Purchasing Power INCREASES...

If there is Legal money then that same, steady, known, finite, and accurately accounted for supply of that exact amount of money, without increase or decrease in that finite supply of money, gains purchasing power as Productive Power increases to a condition of oversupply and as the price of Productive Power decreases.

More power (more wealth) = lower prices of wealth (simple).

Lower prices of wealth and the same amount of money to buy that wealth, and each dollar can then buy more wealth, since the price of wealth goes down. Same amount of total money in use, more stuff to buy = more purchasing power per unit of money. Where 1 dollar could only but 1 thing, now there are 2 things, at lower prices, so 1 dollar now buys 2 things.

Simple.

Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases...

Where does politics fit in?

If there is no legal money then there are no taxes and no demand to pay taxes, and therefore there is no connection between LAW and MONEY, but the Economic Law (without the political part) still applies.

Economic Law remains true with or without LAW.

What happens when crime is made legal?

People either believe in the lie, are led by such falsehoods, or they know better. But in the real world:

Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of Productive POWER WHILE Purchasing Power INCREASES with, or without anyone, anywhere, enforcing any TAX payments of any kind with any money of any kind.

If prices go down the same amount of money buys more, and that is also a fact, but there is one more thing to note:

Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of Productive Power while Purchasing Power increases (deflation) BECAUSE Productive Power reduces the cost of production.

Only the frauds and their victims choose to believe in life without cost, sometimes known as a "something for nothing" scheme, or Pyramid Scheme.

Buying into such things as "something for nothing", or Pyramid, or Ponzi schemes may be a very good investment for the Legal Criminals because the Legal Criminals reap all the rewards while the victims pay all the costs.

There is only one way to reduce the costs of production and that way is to store (by producing more than consumed) Productive Power and the only way to store Productive Power is to make more of it than the amount of it that is consumed during the process of Production.

Leaving even the shadow of doubt behind the reader can know better as to the actual answer to the question asked:

1b.
Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished?

Even the benefactors of such a ponzi, something for nothing, pyramid, scheme lose. It is unquestionable, irrefutable, and a natural fact, that everyone loses because the process of using Productive Power in the work of stealing Productive Power is the same process in nature when a parasite feeds upon a host and the parasite reproduces while the host is bled into a state of anemia, unable to reproduce, and the number of parasites increase while the host grows weaker, until the end result is a dead host, and the end result includes many parasites consuming each other, or some parasites finding another host to feed upon.

It is a race to the bottom, so why let the Legal Criminals keep score: they cook the books?

The only possible winners are the few who know better and the few who have a ready supply of new hosts to consume as these few parasites migrate from country to country each century that goes by while each host is consumed in turn.

By whose measure is that called winning?

America is almost bled dry, and the parasites on the top of that pyramid scheme are moving to China, when the measuring device is "The Dollar", when that dollar is produced by those Legal Criminals.

The parasites on top of that pyramid scheme will dump The Dollar Hegemony on their exclusive schedule, and you won't be getting the memo, and they will be moving their parasitic behinds to China, where they are now very busy booming that new host.

America, as a corporation, is being raided, and well documented, in fact, by the Legal Criminals own cooked books - The Dollar (The FED product).

America is on the bust cycle and Americans, fellow parasites, and fellow net producers (those honest people who actually do produce more than they consume) alike, those not "leaving it", those "loving it" for its capacity to afford honest production, or for its capacity to connect to those who do produce (and feed off of that capacity) alike, everyone, in America, is on the schedule to lose World War III.

Those who fraudulently take power here in America are using their power to wipe us out, maneuver us into a World War that we will lose, because that is how the War Mongers, the War Profiteers, do business, and Americans who still "believe" in the lies will be led into that slaughter as cannon fodder.

There is still time to know better.

Don't feed the Legal Criminals.

End The FED by inventing, producing, and employing productive power, or money, accurate money, in competition with the fraudulent stuff, and they, those parasites, will either consume themselves, find another host somewhere (very bad for the new host for sure) else, or they will be forced to depend upon charity, or they too will learn how to produce real wealth honestly and then they too will join the true Friends of Liberty because then, in our time, crime won't pay so well, it won't be legal anymore.

Ever again.

Not here, not on our watch.

Last edited on Sat Dec 8th, 2012 10:35 pm by