 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/2824348 :
In post: Liberty Day Challenge July 4th 2013 V2
In reply to comment: Mars...You Say! (see in situ)
Baby and Bathwater again
Submitted by Josf on Thu, 11/08/2012 - 03:22. Permalink
"Do you already know about this or am I telling you something new?"
Evil people will invent any lie to cover up their crimes, and the heart of evil, to me, is a failure to meet the challenge to raise the bar of quality and lower the bar of cost.
If it works to call the competition Black while plotting evil to be done to the competition, then that works for liars.
If a person just does not want to be near a darker person, then that person aught to try using sun tan lotion.
I did not get the aversion to darker skin bug, so I like it when my skin turns darker in the sun, what is the problem with darker skin?
If a person just does not want to be near people who work to get something for nothing, then Ben Bernanke is top on the Welfare list, and he is white, so where is this prejudice thing aimed at, exactly?
If someone does not want to be near a prejudiced person, an evil person, then someone aught to look in the mirror first.
Without prejudice is a term, a pair of words in English, that may be worth knowing better.
I did not look at the links, and I prefer to stay out of those types of fights, when it looks like argument of the sake of argument, with prejudice against those who know better, than what is the point?
Prejudice.
How about the meaning of the term collective punishment?
How many ways can an evil person define the actions knowable as crime?
Who benefits when crimes are called anything but crime?
How can we, as moral human beings, accurately discriminate the difference between a person perpetrating a crime and a victim suffering from it?
Thanks for keeping the Speer information up to date, I've been running out of time of late, barely finding time to play the guitar, and my political/economy work has been focusing on Carl Miller, as I'm making a reading list.
The key that opened this Bonding/Common Law door is proving to be a very well lit up room, with many things to see, and know about, better.
https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/5/5.US.137.html
I want to get back to Speer too.
I did read the history lesson on the migration of people from Israel, and perhaps you can help me with a question on the concept of race.
Are the Jewish people considered a race or are the Jewish people considered a group of people who share a specific form of religion?
How do you know that Speer was speaking about Jews?
When does a person stop being a Jew and start being a Gentile?
I know that a person may be born with darker skin, so they are darker skin because of their genetic make up, a race if you will, a genetic make-up that is specific to a set of human characteristics.
I don't normally spend much time on this subject; hence my ignorance about someone who is called a Jew, or people who calls themselves Jews.
I have a pretty big nose, so perhaps I am Jewish?
I don't get it.
I don't like to consume more than I earn, does that make me Jewish?
My parents, one or the other I don't know, decided to have my hose cut off at the end, for some strange reason, so does that make me Jewish?
Meanwhile the Legal Criminals are conducting World War III, as if by accident.
How much of the whole Jewish thing is bathwater?
How much of it is prejudice made legal?
—
Joe