 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Listening to Alex Jones rebroadcast, it is early am for me.
Alex points to a Global money monopoly as American, European, and Asian money competitors merge into one, or some such expectation; creating SDRs, or something.
I do not see this. There will always be a pretend competition, so as to keep the targeted victims divided and fighting each other, which sounds confusing but only when the viewpoint is duplicitous.
Think in terms of the lessons offered by the book 1984.
3 is a significant number, so as to keep people on a false schedule, today we are good, tomorrow we are bad, next day we are on deck, then we are good again. Duplicity requires a short memory, and if there is only one thing that the victims focus on then there is no way to forget the one thing, it is always there, but with 3 things the fake competition can trick people into a false belief in one being the winner, the good guys, until those good guys become so obviously horrible, they are then exposed as being bad, while the actual power shifts to the new false front, from Eastasia, to Eurasia, then to Oceania, and by the time Oceania is know to be really, really, bad, the victims forgot how bad Eastasia was, the actual Legal Criminals move operations back to the new good guys.
Anyone caught remembering is left without a leg to stand on, since all evidence is censored down into the memory hole. That tactic happens right here on this forum; for example the GeoLlibertarian member finds a competitive perspective challenging his lies, so what does he do, he erases history, but I keep my own records, so his tactic doesn't work.
There is no real competition, on purpose, but there is a false competition propped up so as to keep the targeted victims thinking that there are reasons for their steadily increasing costs of living, and their steadily declining standards of living, since the false competitors are doing what they can, but the competition is so much better, or the competition is so bad, the competition is criminal, it is the competition that cause our trouble, and if only we could copy what the competition is doing, etc., on and on, but to no avail, for some strange reason things are not working, when in reality the force of competition does not exist, as each of the three leadership groups are in on the joke, each of the three false competitors are in on the gag, and the actual Legal Criminals hire puppets to run each fake competitor, where the fake competitors can have someone who believes in their sides competitive power up to a point, and if that point is exceeded, a lone gunman appears out of nowhere.
What would happen if one of the three competitors invented, produced, and maintained a steadily improving legal money system? Even going back to gold as money is a huge improvement compared to the best legal money on the planet at this time. Why, please answer the question, why are the legal currencies that are worst for the honest productive people the same legal currencies that dominate the global markets?
How is this not as obvious as the nose on your face?
You have no choice as to which money you are paid, because you have no choice as to which money you must have to pay taxes.
If it was not true, if there is true competition, then the quality of money will increase, by the force of competition, and the cost of money will decrease, yet, obviously, and measurably, the fake competitors are actually cooperating to keep the quality of money low, and the cost of money high, as money is used, in each of the fake competitor "nations", to move the surplus value from those who create it to those who steal it, with their money monopolies that work as monopolies withing their own boarders.
The three major competitors work as one cartel, and if the victims knew it, they would see only one enemy, not three.
It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.
Henry Ford
Are you still confused?
How about another angle of view?
What would happen if this place, this thing we are told is U.S.A., became a working Democratic Federated Republic, instead of one Nation State?
What would happen if one, and then two, and then three, of the State governments decide to use any of the many currencies made throughout the world instead of just one money?
Is that too tough to imagine?
Pick one State to start with, and then work it out.
I'll pick California because I live here, and then I'll pick New Jersey since I lived there when young.
First California decides to allow competition in money markets and the people hired to run California change the laws so that anyone can pay taxes in whatever currency they find to be the most powerful currency at the lowest cost.
How does that work from your own viewpoint?
Any of the tax payers in California can begin to demand payments, for what they are selling, in Euros, or Yuan, or dollars, or gold, or silver, or whatever they think is the best money, and then they pay their taxes in the worst money they know to be worst, and everyone is thereby working in currency speculation.
You go to work and you are paid, by your decision, in gold, say, or silver, or whatever today is the best money, today, and you go home with that money, you earn that money. You keep piling up your best money, and you have to pay for things you want with the best money demanded by those who sell you stuff, but when you pay taxes, you exchange your best money for the worst money that you know to be the worst money on the day you pay taxes.
I, you, your neighbor, and soon everyone in California, then New Jersey demands payment in gold, or silver, or whichever money I, you, or your neighbor thinks is the best money, and that is the income you get, when you trade what you sell for money, and then before you pay California tax payments, you sell your gold, or silver, or whatever you think is the best money, for units of the worst money, that worst money you know to be worst, and that is the money you use to pay tax debt in California, or later in New Jersey when the people hired to run New Jersey change their laws too.
Since it is now a working Democratic Federated Republic and no longer a single Nation State, the people running the Federation no longer tax The People directly, instead the people hired to run the Federation can only get their tax payments from each State in the Federation. California, being smartly run by their hired governors, pay the people running the Federation in Federal Reserve notes, as they too work on currency speculation, as they get whatever currency that The People send to them as tax payments, and they then take those currencies and buy dollars to pay the Federation what the Federation wants as payment. Right now the supposed Federal government demand dollars.
Got that?
You demand the best money to be paid to you for what you produce. You then buy the worst money to pay your State taxes, and you have no Federal tax payments, because now we live in a Federation, not a Nation State. The people you hire to run your State take the worst money they send you and they buy dollars, because dollars are demanded by the people hired to run the Federation.
How does that work for you?
Why don't the people running the Nation State demand gold as payment for tax debt instead of dollars printed by The Federal Reserve System of Extortion?
Is that not a self-evident truth?
The answer is that the pyramid scheme won't work if there is competition, such as gold, which is a very competitive, powerful, money, when compared to the fraudulent stuff.
A one world currency won't work, the victims will no longer volunteer to provide the means by which they suffer, they will be clued in when the lie is one lie, the one lie will be too obvious.
Work on it some, you may get it, before it is too late.
Please.