 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
First we must develop a positive vision of the USA we want to live in. Without that, we will not know what we are struggling FOR -- we will only know what we are struggling AGAINST. And that is precisely how the enemy has usurped our electoral process. They've divided us into red and blue teams, told us what we're supposed to object to, and funded both sets of candidates so that whoever wins will represent THEIR interests.
When human life is understood as a power struggle, it can then be understood that the goal is to use the power available to make more power available, and that can be understood also as a goal of increasing the quality of life while reducing the cost of life at the same time. That as a goal avoids crime entirely, no need to fight crime, crime no longer pays.
1) The government "OF the People, BY the People and FOR the People" must facilitate the economic freedom of ALL its People. If banks provide the cash-flow that serves as the life-blood of the economy, those banks must be federalized and provide interest-free loans to borrowers who will be required to invest that money in America's economy and eventually pay it back. The current infinite growth paradigm in our fiat monetary system (dictated by Central Banks that loan money into existence at interest) is on a collision course with the reality of a planet with finite resources.
The enemy, the people I call Legal Criminals, make power scarce on purpose, so as to cause people to do anything they are told to do, so as to then receive the power they need, begging for power made scarce, and in order to accomplish that goal the Legal Criminals have to gain power over all sources of power, so as to monopolize the production of power, and in order to do that they have to destroy all competition, and among the methods they employ to reach and then maintain those goals, are deceit, threats of violence, and aggressive violence against the innocent, and incorporation of competitors into their exclusive cartel.
If you do not understand that then you won't see the problems associated with your first item on the list of discussion points.
You use the term "federalized" and I wonder if you understand the meaning of that term. What is the difference between a "federalized", single, one and only legal bank, and a Central Bank? The cause of such things as the business cycle is only possible when the victims are led to believe that they have no choice but the one choice for their currency, credit, and capital needs, or in other words their power to purchase. The obvious solution to the monopoly legal money problem is legal money competition. When legal money competition is allowed to exist, when it is not against the law, on a National level, the obvious result will be a steady increase in the quality of the money being offered by the competitors, as the cost of the money being offered by the competitors are forced down too, and the result is improvement, lower costs of living, and higher quality of life, as power is used to make more power, because the power to purchase increases by the force of competition, as better, and better, and better forms of currency are invented, produced, and utilized.
If the Nation here in America wasn't a Nation State, if it were constructed, and then maintained, as a Federation, then competition in all good things would be possible, by design, as each separate and sovereign state would be competing with the others for market share, which would be tax paying voters, who would vote with their feet, when the other methods of expressing their individual political and economic powers failed to cause the desired result.
When you make the statement that the banks must be federalized it sounds to me like you are saying that a central bank must be created, and then you claim that it is the central bank which dictates the issue of money, or some other such wording, and that can be an obvious contradiction. What do you actually mean?
Ron Paul has a good plan to shackle the Nation State with a gold standard, and if I understand his plan, he would also repeal the legal tender laws, which as far as I understand that plan, there would no longer be agents hired by the Nation State so as to enforce a single money issue, and that would fix the problem on both ends, as each separate and sovereign State, such as California, and New York, would be free to offer their own competitive currencies, and they would have to enforce their own monopolies if those government employees had that bright idea, and then the voters could walk to greener pastures, from California, if that State enforced a legal money monopoly, and they could move to New York if that State copied the Nation State example of using gold, or gold and silver, as legal currency. That would turn the Nation state back into something resembling a Democratic Federated Republic, or a Federation, or a Republic, which this Nation State we live under is not, and it was not designed to be one, it was designed to be a Consolidated Government, or Nation State.
2) Federal, State and Local governments should ONLY be allowed to expand their powers by Public Referendum. We the People must be allowed to decide which services we will pay for.
We the People have been duped since Alexander Hamilton and the other monarchists, mercantilists, slave traders, banking monopolists, and nationalists, legal criminals to use one word, perpetrated the fraud that became known as The Constitution. Patrick Henry, among many others, were not duped, and they offered fair warning. The Bill of Rights was a last ditch effort to fight the usurpation of The Constitution, but virtually all the things Patrick Henry, and others, warned about, concerning the intentions of the people behind The Constitution, have come true. Read your history, or be condemned to repeat it. This is not a Federal system, it is a National system, a monopoly power, a consolidated government, a Nation State, and that is what it was designed to be, it was designed to be a dictatorship, and the dictatorship was enabled by The Constitution, because The Constitution was intended to be plausibly deniable, or constructively interpreted, as warned by Patrick Henry and others, during the process that can be accurately described as a fraud, or criminal regime change, or usurpation, or coup d'état.
Who is legally authorized to say what this supposed Federal government can or cannot do? You? Me? Us? How many people refer to the Bill of Rights when they dare to question the power of those hired employees, those governors, presidents, congressmen, judges, tax collectors, and those people who are authorized to interpret The Constitution?
You don't have to take my word on this, you can read the warnings offered by the people who blew the whistle on The Constitution when that fraud was being perpetrated by the Legal Criminals who invented it, produced it, and are maintaining it to this day.
If the idea of liberty once again gains currency, among the victims who were once liberated by their own power of accurate perception, and their own power to employ the power available to make power abundant, then the Legal Criminals will eventually die on the fraudulent vines that currently sustain them, since The People will quickly learn how to stop feeding the legal criminals through those roots leading to those vines, we can cut those connections like cutting a credit card. We can produce our own supplies of power, and the sooner we learn that, the sooner we return on the road of liberty. We can produce our own competitive currency, our own money, our own credit, and we certainly don't need to pay criminals to make these things for our own good. They lie, and they are hired by people who hire them to lie.
3) A democracy cannot function without public trust. False or misleading statements for political or financial gain should be prosecuted as acts of Treason. IMO, this should be mandated via a Constitutional Amendment.
There are many competitive angles by which The People can begin working to sever the connections to the Legal Criminals, like lighting a match, blowing out the match, and then bringing the hot match end close to the tic buried into the skin. One person picking off one tic is one step in the right direction. Everyone picking off every tic all at once is a huge step in the right direction. Whichever method works best can be copied by people who do come around, finally, and begin to seek methods to get off this despicable path, and turn back to Liberty. The Constitutional amendment is one way, but if you look into it, you may find, as I did, that it is a wrong turn.
Not hiring liars to lie for you, is a good start. Prevention is worth a pound of cure.
An actual Federal government is designed to have no connection to the individual (sovereign) people, other than to have in place a ready method by which to defend against foreign Nation States who conduct aggressive wars for profit, when we, in this Federation, are the targets. A single separate and sovereign State government within the Federation may have employees who are liars, whereby the liars who hire them in that state keep hiring liars in that state, for reasons that become painfully obvious to the victims, who are tax payers, and within the Federation those victims have options, freedom, and there may be a competitive state that isn't filled with liars hiring liars to run their State government, and so what happens, by design, in that Federation?
The people who have had enough of the liars hiring liars into office move to a place, within the Federation, where the people are honest, and where the honest people hire honest people to run their State governments.
Which State will flourish?
Which State will die on the vine?
That is the use of competition to avoid the use of monopoly government, by design, and it has proven to be workable.
Do you understand the thinking behind a Federation? Do you need more authority on this subject than my feeble words?
5) What to do about lobbyists? Maybe if we get everything else right, the current fiasco will simply fade away.
A Nation State, by design, is one single, and absolute, authority, and it cannot be questioned, by law. Questioning the single monopoly legal fiction is against the law. Do you understand how that works, by design?
Do you need more proof than my powerless words to know these facts?
6) If corporations are to have all of the rights of people under the law, they must also have all the responsibilities of people under the law. And corporate officers must be held criminally accountable for the actions of the corporations they control. We must therefore change their charter. Currently, corporate officers have a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profits for their shareholders --even if that means destroying the environment to externalize costs of production, or cannibalizing their own consumer market by moving jobs to cheaper labor markets. And they are not legally accountable for very much else. Translation: Our legislature has mandated that all corporate CEOs act like psychopaths -- under penalty of law.
The single, monopoly, Nation State is a corporation, by any other name it smells as bad, the accurate English term is legal fiction. The tactic is as old as dirt. The idea is to create a false entity and then use the false entity as a cover for things done that no one would ever tolerate without the false cover, and when people begin to use their power to stop those things being done by the people hidden behind the false front, the guilty people blame the false front, and the victims expend their power fighting something that doesn't exist, while the guilty simply change the title they use as a false front.
How often do you here someone blaming Wall Street, or government, or The State, for the bad things done by people? People are responsible, and therefore people can be held accountable, not States, not governments, not guns, not pointed sticks, not tools, not lies, but people, actual people, with names, addresses, phone numbers, people do bad things, and people do one bad thing that works, and they lie, and the lie they create is a false front, or a legal fiction, so as to divert the focus of defensive power upon the legal fiction, so as to weaken the victims, and render the victims powerless in defense against all the bad things done by very bad people - people I call Legal Criminals.
OK, I think you get the idea.
The solution to the problem can't be the continued support of the problem. Do you understand how that works?
If the problem is a number of people, about 5 or 10 percent of the population, more or less, employing deceit, threats of violence, and aggressive violence upon every competitor who doesn't join in on the effort, and do as they are told, then the solution to that problem can't be to join in on that effort, doing as told.
Do you see your own contradiction?
You quote from a document that expresses the Spirit of 1776, which may have been a misdirected spirit of Liberty, leading to war, unfortunately.
Do you understand how that worked? A bunch of people decided to combine their power in defense against a monopoly government power, a Monarchy power, whereby a few, about 5 or 10 percent of the population, more or less, employed all manner of bad things to subjugate the rest of the population into a master/slave association, or involuntary association, and when the targeted victims declared their independence, the leadership of the monopoly government power ordered an aggressive war for profit, an invasion, and occupation, rape, murder, and enslavement; but the friends of liberty prevailed under an Experimental Democratic Federated Republican form of government: The Articles of Confederation.
That is the context of The Declaration of Independence.
What happened after the British were driven out?
There was an attempt by the governors of Massachusetts to conduct aggressive wars for profit up north, to seize control of land in Canada, and their wars failed, and they had to pay the bills accrued from that waste of criminal power, and then those governors began printing fraudulent money so as to steal the wealth from their own tax payers. The tax payers included many former soldiers who fought and won the battle against the British for doing the same thing, so when their own home grown dictators tried the same trick, the ex-revolutionary war veterans rebelled, so as to do exactly the same thing they did before, to defend their own liberty, and to "alter or to abolish" the criminal regime within one of the separate and sovereign States within the Federated government under The Articles of Confederation.
Why do you think George Washington, who promised to avoid political office, took office?
He turned his coat. Once he defended the spirit of liberty and then he crushed it.
You won't trust my words, of course, and I'm not going to waste my time proving this to you, what would be the point? When the loop is closed, when a belief in falsehood is defended vehemently, there is only one way out: from within.
If you ask questions, if you want proof, I'll point you to it.
The Declaration of Independence is a report that announces the facts of liberty, including a power by which people can, if they will, abolish a criminal government.
The Constitution makes defense against a criminal government illegal, it can't be any clearer, but words are not deeds, and meaning does not exist in words, people invent, produce, and maintain meaning - individually.
Good luck with your efforts. It may work to accomplish something, and if it accomplishes legalized monetary competition, that will be enough, we will have then the power to avoid being victims of Legal Crime.