| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Sep 3rd, 2011 02:44 pm |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
I'm still not buying LVT personally. If we ever were systematically change the way property rights are addressed I feel that allodial titles should be most prevalent. I am not for anyone being able to lay any form of taxation on land. If you can be taxed on any form of property, you simply DO NOT own it. You have the illusion of ownership. If your idea of "participating" in this topic means blabbing ad nauseam about things that have little or nothing to do with this topic (just to hear yourself talk), then yes. Anyone, There are two quotes above. They are diametric opposites. One is a welcome, challenging, and a competitive viewpoint, and the other is false, and dictatorial. Having returned to face the wrath of the dictatorial oppressor, libeler, in an effort compete with a competitive viewpoint, I can see, and I can know better, as to the cost of doing so, as time goes by. To address the competitive viewpoint, and hopefully avoid the dictatorial one, I can offer agreement, instead of argument. What is the goal? If the goal is to control all the people, then tax the land where all the people live, and make the tax involuntary, whereby those who are taxed must pay, or failure to pay results in swift and brutal punishment. That is the dictators choice. I prefer to call them Legal Criminals, since they are not mere criminals, they are the hi-bred criminal types who access the rule of law, so as to make crime legal. Call that babbling if you want to censor such things. Shoot the messenger. A curious thing happened some time ago, whereby the social connection between those who tax and those who are taxed changed from a dictatorial, or involuntary, association, to one that was not, and measurably not involuntary. How did they tax, then? I'm speaking about the time between the involuntary association between The British Dictatorship, or Monarchy, taxing the people in The Colonies, that later became known as The United State; that time period. What was the method of taxing in New Jersey during those days under The Articles of Confederation, compared competitively, with the method of taxation in Pennsylvania, in that same time period, and what was the method of taxation between The Federal government, under The Articles of Confederation, and the Separate and Sovereign States? Will the answer to my questions be welcome, competitive, and lend toward an improved overall perspective, or will the dictator punish me again? How do you know when a Legal Criminal is lying? They resort to libel to censor a competitive viewpoint?
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||