| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Sep 2nd, 2011 10:33 am |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
southernmissouri2007, I do not agree with you because the deception involves a deeper confusion of reality. There can be voluntary associations, and those associations can be called government. There can be a voluntary association that can be called a socialist government. There can be a voluntary association that can be called a capitalist government. There can be a voluntary association that can be called a mixture of a socialist and a capitalist government. A person can be anti-government when a person is against a voluntary association. What would a person who is anti-government (when a person is against a voluntary association) be for, or what would someone against a voluntary association be supporting as someone was thinking and acting in ways that are measurably against voluntary associations that are called governments? The majority of voting Democrats inside the legal power of The Nation known as The United States of America are against voluntary associations which can be called governments and therefore they are anti-government. The majority of voting Republicans inside the same legal fiction boundaries are against voluntary associations, for the same reasons as the Democrats. Both Democrats and Republicans are anti-government when the governments they are against are characterized by their voluntary nature. What are they for? What do they stand for, as they stand against voluntary associations? They stand for involuntary associations that they call government. They are pro slavery, by that definition. They are anti-liberty, by that definition. Just ask one, or yourself, to measure the thoughts, and the actions, of the person, the individual person in question, if they support the enforcement of involuntary taxes. When you respond, I can then find out if I agree with you or not. Your response can clue me in on your thoughts and actions that let me know if you are a friend of liberty, and therefore my friend, of if you are a foe of liberty, and therefore my enemy, and your responses can clue me in on what you do support, and if you support enforced involuntary taxes, then you are one of the Legal Criminals, by that definition, as you define yourself in that way, and I can know better from then on as to who I need to avoid, and why I need to avoid you, and your kind, if that is how you define yourself, as someone who supports involuntary associations through involuntary taxation. If I get no response, what does that indicate?
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||