 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Anyone,
Gary North has just published another article on the September 11, 2001 crimes that have so far managed to work better unsolved; which is a clue for the clueless.
As a trained historian, I am interested in lots of major events in history that served as national or worldwide turning points. I ask the following questions:
1. What happened?
2. How do we know what happened?
3. What led up to the event?
4. How did the government report the event?
5. How did it subsequently explain the event?
6. How did the major media handle the government's explanation?
7. Who has benefited from the event?
8. Who has benefited from the official government explanation?
9. What are the alternative explanations?
10. Who would benefit if any of them became widely accepted?
I am going to field all 10 questions before reading another word from the official mouth piece of The Austrian Economists.
1. What happened?
I was driving a car to accomplish some errand for some productive work and I heard a radio broadcast interrupting the normal flow of music, which usually inspires me to turn the volume up, and commercials which usually inspire me to turn the volume way down low, and the interruption had to do with reports of events in New York. When the reports described the Legal Crimes of September 11, 2001, in progress, on that day, my first thought was False Flag, on the order of dressing up like Cherokee, or Lenape, or any bothersome group of undesirable people, and then conducting a False Flag Operation, or Black Ops, whereby a few innocent victims (of the home team) are massacred, or 2000 innocent victims (of the home team) are massacred, and then the massacre is blamed on "Indians" or "rag heads", so as to begin reporting a false version of the ongoing slaughter of the bothersome group.
False Flag Operations have been around for ages, and it isn't news for those who can recognize the routine. What happened is what happened, what I make of what happened doesn't change what happened.
2. How do we know what happened?
"We" don't know precisely what happened, but some people do. Those who planned what happened planned what happened, they knew, and some still know, did they forget? The facts of what they knew, and when they knew it, can be pieced together beyond a reasonable doubt, or not, depending upon how well those who planned what happened cover up what happened.
Those who suffer physical injury know their physical injuries in the form of pain. Survivors of those who died, suffer emotional pain, for example. First responders, suffer, the know what happened, they still know.
3. What led up to the event?
Some people went to work in places that were targeted for destruction, others did not. Some bet heavily against rising Airline stock for Airlines involved in the event, others were not as clued in on the pending events.
4. How did the government report the event?
Gary is resorting to an abuse of language. Gary is lumping every person into the one monolithic set of people called government, or not, I can't tell. We, in America, are self-governed as no other people ever in human history, if numbers of people are factored into the measure, so as to avoid comparing us to small tribes of people here, and there, now and then, and as such We the People govern, and some of us are Legal Criminals, and some of us are Honest Productive Americans, and some of us are hired by the Legal Criminals to lie, and some of us hire the people who lie by voting for people to lie for them.
Gary may be using the word government to mean those people who are hired to lie, and so the answer to the question by Gary North, if that is his use of that word, is that they lied; they did what they were hired to do.
They lied.
That is what the people who vote for them hire them to do, and that is what they do, so that is what they did, and their lies are the official reports published as the official lies.
If Gary North's question applies to any of us, in the group of We the People, then some of us asked questions as a means of reporting the events, so as to better understand the facts concerning what happened, so as to know the facts, and in so doing, from a position of knowledge of the facts, it is more likely to be in a position to avoid being similarly injured in the future. My first question, while driving in the car, was to ask what would be the next event after the False Flag event, since False Flag events are used to begin reporting a new false version of ongoing Legal Crimes, such as the events in the past whereby the Legal Criminals mass murdered the indigenous, or native, people here in this land we call America. The next event was not known until it happened, and it is still happening, the targets are rag heads who happen to be the indigenous population, the natives, who live in lands that are rich in oil supplies, and oil power is the power that backs the fraudulent dollar power, also known as The Dollar Hegemony, or The New World Order, or The New American Century, or take your pick from any number of false fronts for those Legal Criminals who operate from this land that we call America, for as long as America works as a home base, which isn't much longer.
5. How did it subsequently explain the event?
It is a mythical beast, or it is a list of names, or something in between. If it is the list of names that make up the top 10 or top 100, most destructive Legal Criminals, or the top 100 Legal Criminals who perpetrated the events on September 11, 2001, in New York, and elsewhere, then the answer remains the same: cover-up. The events are coverups, or False Flags, so as to lead into further cover-ups, such as a new aggressive war for profit in The Middle East, and even to cover-up Legal Crime at home, such as the falsely named Patriot Act. In the old days the Legal Criminals called their Acts by names like Alien and Sedition Acts, but today they resort to deceit, the old employees where too honest, over time the new employees lie more.
Legal Criminal A
"What should we call our latest Legal Crime?"
Legal Criminal B
"How about The Patriot Act?"
Legal Criminal A
"LOL"
Legal Criminal B
"ROFL"
Legal Criminal A and B in unison:
"All the way to their BANK!"
6. How did the major media handle the government's explanation?
Gary North is being stupid? I don't think so. What does Gary North mean by the use of the term major media? I know of one reporter who reported a report on a subsidized television broadcast network, a legal fiction company that is awarded a license to broadcast on a few official government sanctioned broadcast channels, whereby the person hired to report on one of those government subsidized television channels reported controlled demolition while a sky scraper in New York went down in free fall, just like every other successful controlled demolition. Many reporters are hired to report things on many media outlets, and if Gary North is narrowing down the number of media outlets to only those who are subsidized, licensed, by U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), then he should be specific, not ambiguous.
What does Gary North mean? Does Gary North mean to be ambiguous, so as to afford plausible dependability for his own personal satisfaction of avoiding accountability for his questions?
7. Who has benefited from the event?
Some of those who benefited are those who cashed in on their put options. Others who have benefited have published their desire to benefit from a New Pearl Harbor, and they did so before it happened, and their wishes came true, remarkably.
If the question is asked in earnest, the answer can be realized accurately. Paper trails still exist. Physical evidence still exists, despite all the tax dollars spent in the cover-up. A new False Flag may very soon replace the old one on the priority list, since the old one failed to polarize the victims against the Legal Criminals, hold the actual perpetrators to account, and that failure leaves them in a position of power to repeat the same type of False Flag Operation, perpetually. The last False Flag, the September 11, 2001 False Flag, managed to polarize the victims against other victims, the cycle is primed for repetitive, or cyclic, perpetuation, and that isn't random, unless the victim has a vested interest in remaining victims, then the victims can make themselves believe that False Flags are random events, at which point, deep down into the mire of falsehood, the victim is no longer innocent, and therefore no longer a victim, the former innocent victim goes beyond plausible dependability and on into actual accountability along the paper trails, and digital trails that link those who produce the power that is then sent to the Legal Criminals who then use that power to keep the power flowing in that direction.
Those who hire the liars, get what they pay for, and claiming otherwise can be trusted to be exactly what such a claim is, in fact.
8. Who has benefited from the official government explanation?
Who benefits from candy coating the lies produced by those who are hired to lie for those who hire them?
Even the word "candy coating" is not accurate.
Why does Gary North lie for the Legal Criminals, is Gary North paid to lie for the Legal Criminals, or is he working pro-bono, as a liar for the Legal Criminals, helping cover-up a decade old crime?
Will Gary North wipe his brain clean during the next False Flag, so as to be ready, on schedule, to lie when prompted, again?
9. What are the alternative explanations?
A False Flag Operation is a well known fact. The sun is a well known fact. Daylight is a well known fact. Is Gary North constructing a Man of Straw? Where is this impending Conspiracy Theorist with these "alternative explanations"?
A sky scraper accelerating to earth in free fall is exactly that, it is what it is, a sky scraper accelerating to earth in free fall is a sky scrapper accelerating to earth in free fall. There is but one explanation, and it is the same explanation that has worked every time a sky scrapper accelerates to earth in free fall, falling into a hole in the ground where the building's foundation once supported all that mass that constitutes a sky scrapper.
Some people may require an explanation for the Sun, having grown up, to this point, without the necessary information required to know what the sun is, in fact; but not necessarily having to know the exact physical make up, or the exact process by which sunlight is produced, on a molecular level, but the damn thing orbits every day, so far, and being stupid about the sun is about as excusable, these days, as being willfully stupid about the False Flag Operation perpetrated by known criminals who confess, openly, and who happen to be hired to commit crimes by the people who hire them, and who happen to be hired into positions of almost absolute power, as far as the power that an individual human being can command.
I can't, for example, legally double the supply of dollars in circulation around the world, and get away with it, but the people who are hired to command that much power do, and that is another known fact, like knowing that the Sun is a source of power, it isn't brain surgery, or rocket science, for modern, ordinary, examples of mankind.
What game is Gary North playing? Is he another presstitute in the inventive vernacular offered by Gerald Celente, or is Gary North actually that stupid? Is there another explanation for Gary North publishing stupid questions?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=presstitute
Gerald is not given credit? He may not be the inventor, but he is working to make the word more current, as the word gains currency. Some day people will be using the term Legal Crime, hopefully to be recording past events, in history books, back when Legal Crime was common, and even ubiquitous, before Liberty Day.
10. Who would benefit if any of them became widely accepted?
Gary North is leading into a reverse of the common use of finding motive when investigating, and discovering, exculpatory evidence, leading to the accurate identification of those responsible for crimes, so as to hold those responsible for crimes accountable for the crimes that the criminals have committed, even if they happen to hold licenses, and have badges.
I used a word above that can help the reader understand the process.
Exculpatory evidence leads to a verdict of innocence as someone assumed to be innocent, before being convicted, beyond a shadow of doubt, is found to be innocent, and is not found to be guilty, because the evidence found proves innocence, beyond a reasonable doubt.
An example would be the discovery of a solid alibi.
Joe was accused of stealing half the purchasing power of every dollar used by everyone who uses dollars.
Joe was never hired as the chairman of The Federal Reserve System of Extortion.
That is my alibi. Even if I could double the entire supply of dollars from my garage, I can't get away with it, legally.
I can't print up enough money to hire people to destroy 3 buildings in New York full of people, and print up enough money to get away with it, either.
I have an alibi.
10. Who would benefit if any of them became widely accepted?
That is in reference to this:
9. What are the alternative explanations?
The best alternative explanation I've seen so far is the mini-nuke explanation; which explains the odd burned cars around "ground zero". Who benefits from the truth?
Is that what Gary North is asking?
I don't think so.
I think that Gary North is constructing a Man of Straw, and the Man of Straw will have a name placed on it, and the name will be Conspiracy Theorist, and all those who are duped by that brainwashing, like Pavlov's dogs, will salivate on command when that bell rings.
I can read on, to see what Gary North actually publishes next, in this second offering on the subject of the Legal Crimes of September 11, 2001.
These are all legitimate questions. The toughest one to answer is #1. You might not think that this is the case, but it is.
Gary North is the authority there, obviously, but I'm going to ask a competitive question after repeating Gary North's version of the toughest question.
1. What happened?
1. What happens next?
Which is tougher?
On with Gary North:
If a rich person or organization gave me a large amount of money to investigate 9-11, what would I do with it?
I can make another guess at what Gary North is doing with this second article he has just published on the subject of the Legal Crimes committed on September 11, 2001, and my guess is that Gary North is finding his way past some of his reliance upon an abject belief in falsehood, and if that is happening, then this is a very good study.
People pass through a time when there is no more room for abject belief in falsehood, and that point at which that happens the person's perspective can no longer tolerate obvious falsehood, but it is a troubling time, as the old stupid self is replaced by the new more accurately perceiving self. It, to me, is like walking from one dark room, through a one way door, into a room where things can be seen, things that once were well hidden, and well hidden on purpose, and well hidden for profit, and no longer are the purposed, and the profits realized, and there is no way back into the dark room, the door closes, and while the door is open, at that moment, how ever long it takes, the door can be shut as the person in the open doorway decides to stay in one, or the other room.
Gary may have that door open, and that is my guess, for now.
Something has to explain the behavior of the sycophants who actually think that the Emperor's cloths are beautiful, while the Emperor's weenie is swinging around as he struts. You can take me to task for repetitively resorting to this figurative illustration, a weenie fixation, but the illustration works well. The naked truth is as obvious as a naked man, or the sun, or the pain as you stick your hand in a fire. What explains the fact that so many people are violently defending abject falsehood, placing clothes that don't exist on naked men, legitimizing torturous mass murder?
Anyone of us, any person alive today, can be captured, legally, and before a few hours are over, any one of us, can be secreted away into a torture chamber, never to be seen by any of our loved one's ever again, all done legally, and picture your own hide in that position 6 hours from this moment. You are here now, 6 hours later, you are in a situation that is unspeakable, unbearable, and it is worse because human beings, or nearly human, beings, are working to make your pain as extreme as is humanly, or inhumanly possible, and it is unthinkable.
It is unspeakable.
It is unthinkable.
It is intended to be unspeakable, unthinkable, and unbearable, on purpose, for the profit of a very few, at the expense of everyone who produces anything that can be expended in that way.
Some people have actually lived through such things. They warn the rest of us in no uncertain terms. Read Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn.
You have been warned.
What explains the behavior of the massive numbers of sycophants?
Here is the definition of the word:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sycophant
a self-seeking, servile flatterer; fawning parasite.
Here is another definition:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sycophants
A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people.
That source traces the word back to informer, or accuser, but even that should read: false informer, and false accuser.
Paul Revere, and Thomas Paine were people who informed, as they informed the impending victims, and informed the current victims, as to their plight at the hands of those who caused the suffering.
Thomas Paine was especially informative, in an accurate, and not in a false, way:
http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm
Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer.
The army of sycophants, which are not the American Military (not as an institution, and not as a measure of the mean average membership), would shoot (figurative and literally; in the back), a modern day Thomas Paine (Gerald Celente) or Paul Revere (Alex Jones), as a Conspiracy Theorist.
What explains the army of sycophants?
They have slammed the door shut, as the door may have once opened a crack, and as the light shined in, they saw the dungeon that they know to be used on the victims, and they new, at that moment, that going through that door moves them up in the line, as the victims are picked through, and the next in line to be tortured is taken, and they will be taken sooner, rather than later. The door is slammed shut, never to be opened again, and anyone caught trying to open the door will be shot on sight, even if the sight is off by a wide margin, shoot first, ask no questions.
Go through that door, into the light, into the naked light of accurate perception, responsibility, and heaven forbid, accountability, into active, meaningful, moral conscience driven consciousness, and be one step closer to the inevitable verdict of disfavor, and hell on earth at the hands of the emperor.
What explains the army of sycophants?
They volunteer to be victims, and that is where they decide to stay, and it is a lie, and that one lie leads to two lies to cover up that one lie, and then another lie for each new lie, and that is a non-linear, or exponential, increase in the number of lies required to cover up the first one, and eventually the person who slams that door shut, by hook or by crook, must keep it shut, and it is then a closed loop.
What explains the army of sycophants?
Among the Austrian Economics group is a person named Hans Herman Hoppe, and he offers information, an informer, on the subject of time preferences.
"I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today"
Something for nothing is the lie that covers up the desire for something at the expense of someone else.
Not just the desire for something. Not just for the desire for something falling out of the sky, winning the lottery, or the object of someone else's incredible generosity. Not that. Not gambling by random chance. The game is fixed.
The cover-up is specific. The cover-up is a desire for something, specifically something, and something that is gained at the specific expense of someone else.
It is the same lie as the lie of might making right.
The same lie used to create the illusion of legitimacy for every crime: Legal Crime.
The victim deserves to be victimized, and I am helping the victim, by teaching the victim to learn to avoid being a victim: tough love. I kill them to save them from death. I deceive them to save them from deception. I hate them to save them from hate. I offer them abject slavery to save them from abject slavery. I torture them to save them from torture. I mass murder them to save them from mass murder, who else can?
How many lies can be hatched from that one lie?
What explains the army of sycophants?
If you can't beat'em: join em'.
Take a number. The hamburger can be had today, which is a stay of execution, to be paid on Tuesday.
That is the false cover-up deal.
In reality, the accurate explanation, call it a theory from my end, is that those who shut the door are those who want to play a minor role in being a tyrant today, even if it means being a victim on Tuesday.
To understand this, call it a theory, you have to know yourself.
Why did you shut the door?
Which room are you in?
Were the crimes on September 11, 2001 ever investigated officially, so as to actually hold those responsible for those specific crimes specifically accountable to those criminals who perpetrated those specific crimes?
No, power is diverted into exposing the conspiracy theorists who don't exist.
Is it good enough to punish rag heads for those crimes, so as to get a perceived benefit in lower prices at that gas station?
If you are still reading, there may be hope yet.
On the subject of random number generators that Gary North links as he ends his second offering on the subject of the Legal Crimes of September 11, 2001 I can ask:
How do the "random" generators in question work?
If they do not have a means by which a random occurrence, such as very precise room temperature change, perhaps, any random thing that triggers the "random" number being generated, then the "random" generator isn't random, it is programed, not random.
Flipping a coin, for example, is not random when the person flipping the coin can flip the coin a fixed number of turns each time.
Fixing the number is fixing the number.
Random is random.
Confusing the two, on purpose, requires willful intent, and if there is someone willfully intending to confuse the two, they do so with a specific goal in mind, which isn't going to be self-confusing, it is going to be, by definition, a goal to confuse a targeted person other than the person who willfully intends to confuse the two things.
Who has a desire to cause someone else to confuse the fixing of a number with a random number?
Who invented the shell game? Why did someone invent the shell game, or the pyramid scheme, or legal crime?
What inspires someone to deceive their own power to perceive accurately?