 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Anyone,
The title for the article above is:
World Trade Center Building 7 and Conspiracy Theories
When a liar can no longer tell when their words are lies, the loop closes, and a case can be made for a rewrite of an old saying.
Live by the lie, die by the lie.
The term "Conspiracy Theorist" is a lie.
The words are mere symbols, and the meaning is false. The words can be Fried Chicken, so long as the false meaning remains as destructive to the victims of the lies; including the liars who can no longer tell that they are lying.
A quote from the article:
Only a handful of experts have ever publicly argued that the cause of the bildings' collapse was a system of controlled demolition. Anyone who dares to mention the pancake collapse of the third tower is rejected derisively as a conspiracy theorist.
That is cut and pasted so the misspelling isn't mine.
Note the use of the word handful, which is ambiguous, and likely to be ambiguous so as to be plausibly deniable. What is the number of people who have... hold on, there is another word worthy of noting.
Note the use of the word argued.
How about a factual statement instead of a theory, argument, expert opinion, or otherwise less than a specific, accurate, truthful statement?
Following are a list of links to people who have uncovered, or discovered, conclusive evidence in support of a guilty verdict, beyond a shadow of doubt, were there ever to be a trail, so as to judge the perpetrators of the crimes involving the destruction of 3 buildings in New York city on September 11 2001, and in this list the people who have accomplished these tasks are numerous, many people, and the number of the people who have accomplished this task are knowable as that exact number, since they all have names, they all live on Earth, they have addresses, phone numbers, and they breath oxygen.
http://www.ae911truth.org/
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/
http://www.911truth.org/
Returning to the quote from the article by Gary North:
Only a handful of experts have ever publicly argued that the cause of the bildings' collapse was a system of controlled demolition. Anyone who dares to mention the pancake collapse of the third tower is rejected derisively as a conspiracy theorist.
How many people can fit into one hand?
Who decides if a person is an expert or if a person is a "Conspiracy Theorist"?
Who decides if the authorities are criminals?
If the criminals get to decide that they are the authorities, then words can become meaningless for the victims, while words are still effective and useful tools used by the Legal Criminals.
Think please. Who ever, in your entire life, has ever used the term Legal Criminal. One person, so far, and you may want to know why language has escaped your command on this one.
Dictatorial regimes invent, produce, and maintain one way forms of exchange media.
The victims are the subjects of the one way exchanges that flow through the one way exchange mediums. Those who invent, produce, and distribute the media, which are words, images, symbols, language, money, and all forms of media, flowing one way down the channels of exchange, command those one way forms of media that they alone invent, and the victims are subject to those demand notices, those dictates, those one way communications, those orders, those commands, those crimes against humanity.
The victims get the smelly end.
The Legal Criminals know that there is a smelly end, so they at least know better than to obey, they no how to avoid avoid getting only the smelly end of those one way forms of media, the victims cannot know, if they are allowed to know, they would have a choice, and the only one's choosing to be victims, once they know, will be those who like to be victims, and then, by definition, if language isn't corrupted, they are not victims, they are merely people who like, who choose, to be injured in some way.
Love your lies.
Lick the boots of your oppressors.
Dig faster, die faster, cover the grave of the slave who died sooner, he won, it is now your turn.
Hurry up.
Obey.
There is no choice.
You can't even invent a word, and have the word gain currency, since the word has to pass through the gauntlet of self-appointed authorities who process the new word and either reject it, or accept it, and then the word either gains currency, or the word is sent into the memory hole.
Terms are similarly filtered internally and externally.
Legal Crime.
If a word does manage to get past the authorities, despite all the costs expended in the work of censorship, the word is then targeted for destruction, so as to regain control over language, and so as to keep the power of accurate communication out of the hands of the targeted victims.
Note, how difficult it is for you to read simple English right here, and know what I am talking about right here, right now. This is English, like: See spot run.
It depends upon what run means. How do you interpret the word see?
Conspiracy was once a word used by the victims so as to rally the victims, and polarize the victims, of the conspiracy, so as to afford the victims the power to avoid further victimization.
Note how I carefully avoid the use of the words justice, punishment, and I even try desperately to avoid the use of the terms trial, law, order, and judgement.
For lack of accurate currency, what power do the victims have left?
Grin and bear their condition of victimization, since no single victim has enough power alone to stop an organized crime ring that has managed to infiltrate and command the power of government.
Conspiracy fact is rendered powerless.
How about a modern day reference to a past event?
Paul Revere is riding down the street yelling, in English: The British are coming, and all who hear his message shoot Paul Revere (the messenger) as a Conspiracy Theorist.
What would have happened to Common Sense?
Those who are well trained victims would have shot that messenger too, as Thomas Paine is branded as just another Conspiracy Theorist.
Burn the book for fuel. Who published it? How much was the price of it?
I, for one, can't get past the censors in your brain. What happened to Patrick Henry?
You may have remembers Give me Liberty or give me death, but his later message was shot down, and you will refuse to know it.
Patrick Henry was one of the first conspiracy theorists in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) before the ink dried.
What happens if someone tries to blow the whistle on capitalism? They are called Monetary Cranks, Conspiracy Theorists, and that message of dire warning is rendered powerless as a means of rallying the troops in the effort to defend against organized victimization by a few powerful people; with or without badges.
Why not give credit where credit is due? There is no exclusive profit in it; at someone's exclusive expense.
Call someone a socialist, and the same shot goes through the heart of the message, killing the message. Where is the book titled The History of Socialism (by Steven Pearl Andrews)? I keep looking, but it may have been burned for fuel.
What happens when the message, despite all the forces aligned against the message (all the collective powers of censorship), when the message does manage to gain currency?
The Revolution will not be televised.
The shots aimed at the message are aimed at the messenger, when the message does make it past the censors, when the message threatens to gain currency, and threatens to consume market share.
A few cases in point, can be pointed out. MLK, JFK, and conspiracy facts from then on become even more difficult to crush, kill, and censor.
Resort to deceit, threats of violence, and violence.
Produce an abundance of fear.
I like these two:
1.
http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/jimbellap.htm
2.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8403350824865189566
Fact: In case 1 the person was sent to prison
Fact: In case 2 the person suffered a premature death
When your closest dear loved ones are targeted, then, you may think twice about obeying the conditioned responses, jerking your knees upon command, the bell rings, you salivate, socialism is mentioned, you fear, you are angered, you seek retribution, punishment, bark like a dog, bark louder, and then when you are targeted you may invent your own new lies to escape the inevitable realization of the facts, you are the victim, you are not, you are, you are not, you are, anything but the truth, an argument you can't win, on purpose, for your own profit, while you die a miserable, horrifying, torturous, twisted, death.
I can't say, you may be joining in, and targeting, while that is an option, while you keep a close eye out for fellow members of the targeting group, as they may target you while you target the victims given to you, until the supply of victims run out. Live by the sword, die by it.
The road is going away from liberty when messengers are shot, figuratively, and literally; hence concepts like those expressed in one of the Bill of Rights.
As such:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Patrick Henry was right, that was an impudent last ditch effort to salvage the power of liberty in the face of legal crime, of the day, which was Nationalism, hidden behind the false front of Federalism.
Patrick Henry was one of the Federalists, by definition, but not by the terms of the times. He was then known as an Anti-Federalists, and that measures the power of falsehood, since "The Federalists" (tm), of that time, were the Nationalists, they had built and effective false front.
The meanings of words are rendered meaningless when language is rendered powerless.
What is a conspiracy?
What facts can be known about any conspiracy?
Who has the authority to officially recognize anything?
What have you been smoking? How much will you pay me for this bridge in Brooklyn?
Back to Gary North:
Conclusion: the following is not true. "All three are clearly controlled demos. Everyone that views it knows it." Almost no one who views it knows it, and anyone who points out the obvious -- the pancake collapse of all three -- risks either ostracism or patronizing smirks.
Why choose the word pancake, and the word collapse? Is Gary North salivating, and barking like a dog?
Building 7 falling free is as obvious as the need to avoid staring at the sun. Blindness is the cost of failing to know the truth.
Building 7 did not collapse, nor pancake. The accurate term in English is free fall.
Remove the accurate term in English and what is placed in place of the accurate term, and why is the accurate term removed, and why is the other term put in place of the accurate term?
Ask Alexander Hamilton?
I can pretend to do so.
Joe
"Al, set me straight here: why did you call yourself a Federalist when you were obviously a Nationalist?
Al
"I'm dead now, and turning in my grave I might add, so I can tell the truth now, but the accurate term then was Monarchist. I was a flaming Monarchist, and that would not sell, or rather the victims would not buy into a Consolidated Government, or Monarchy, since the intended victims had just suffered greatly in the despicable work of getting rid of a Monarchy, so we had to choose the label of our worst enemies The Federalists."
Joe
"I know, I know, Al, I'm just working you for a confession. So, seriously, did you laugh all the way to your State Bank when the intended victims started calling their fellow friends of liberty Anti-Federalists, when they were the actual Federalists?"
Al
"LOL"
Joe
"All the way to your monopoly bank?"
Al
"ROTFL"
Once there were 3 buildings, scraping the sky, they fell into holes in the ground, freely.
Look at the sun.
Look at the sun.
Stare at the sun, until you go blind.
Buildings may, some day, pancake. Where is one that has done so? Buildings may have collapsed. Where is one that has done so?
Stone age buildings?
Even during the free fall of the buildings in New York the news reporters hired to spread falsehoods were reporting Controlled Demolition as the obvious events were obvious as yet to be rendered false.
What explains a common falsehood such as this?
What explains a naked emperor strutting around with his weeny dangling as all the sycophants busy themselves in the creative work of imagining fashionable attire figuratively placed upon the naked Emperor?
Gary North explains, while he participates.
What is at the end of this road is well documented by Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn in his work titled with Gulag. Talk about terror.
It has been said that one of the highest quality, and highest cost (to the victims) Legal Crime boss, a man names Joseph Stalin, spoke, and when he was done speaking the audience in the room applauded, and each in the room knew not to be the first to stop applauding. How long did they suffer the clap?
Fear is the current regime.
Why accept that sentence?
You have been told to do so.
Is it past time to stop being abjectly obedient to falsehood?
Stick your hand in a fire.
Stick your hand in a fire.
Where do you want to be by July 4th 2012? The road you are on leads somewhere, and you can fear it, or you can choose, by your own power of perception, and your own power of will, a higher quality, and lower cost option.
Back to Gary North:
"I wonder what else they lied about."
They lied about The Constitution.
Who are they?
Alexander Hamilton is one of the set of people used in the accurate sentence above referring to they who lied about The Constitution. Call me a conspiracy theorist, and call me a revisionist historian, call me late for dinner, I don't want to eat that meal, nor drink the cool-aid being served.
They lied about legal money.
Who are they?
They are some of The Austrian Economists; within their group some lie, some do not, and they have names, and they leave paper trails, where their lies are documented facts.
When each and every Honest Productive American knows the full measure of their victimization, at the hands of the Legal Criminals, they will begin to mount a defense, and on the laundry list of things to do will be the invention, production, and maintenance of accurate, high quality, and lower cost mediums of exchange, such as accurate language, so as to be able to convey accurate meaning from one Honest Productive American to another, and such things as accurate money, accurate currency, which will be high quality, powerful, and low cost, but not for Legal Criminals.
Not this:
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
That is interestingly low cost to a very few, at the expense of many. If that is good enough for you, then that confesses which side you are on, even if it does not confess accurately within your own infected brain.
Good luck.