 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
If the human condition is understood as a power struggle, the pieces fall into place, producing a reasonable, and accurate, measurable picture.
Those who can manage to cause other people to believe lies, for example, have access to the power in falsehood, and those who fall victim to falsehood are powerless against it.
When each victim is thereby weakened they can even be directed by lies to give up even more power as they are led to believe that the power they give up is going to be used in their own defense, when in actuality their power is being used to injure them, by taking even more power, and that is a closed loop - providing the means by which we suffer.
As the injured become weaker, they are inspired to give up even more power, still thinking that the power they are giving up is going to cause their defense, when the power given up makes them even weaker instead. That can be seen when following the single legal money.
I call it Legal Crime.
The fact that words often have two opposite meanings, such as Liberal, and Capitalist, should spark the necessary chain reaction that can break the closed loop, as the victims slowly realize how language has become the device the transfers falsehood from the producers of falsehood to the victims, and not the other way around. Language is a medium of exchange, a currency.
Someone earlier had suggested a need to start at money, or finances, and from that beginning, or from that sound foundation, the current human situation can be better understood, or in other words a similar message was offered.
What if words have been corrupted to a point of making language weak?
The tool that is needed for self defense can be turned around into a tool used to weaken us even further.
"The British are Coming." can turn into "Fight the Global War on Terror", or "Spread Democracy".
That can, in a way, bring you up to speed.
Like this:
http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm
Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer.
If the victims are conditioned to obey, and they are then told to never question their orders, the loop closes.
Like this:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
Do you understand how the power struggle shifted in that example above?
How about the following battle lost?
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html
AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
A place where, supposedly, the people retain the right to throw out abusive government changed to a place where the same people pay for their own demise, legally, and how can that be understood when the victims no longer are in command of their own language?
Even if there were many ways out of this jam, which there are, those who know can't reach those who are as yet dumfounded, stupefied, and caught in that closed loop.
The enemy is here, it isn't the British, and a look in the mirror can begin the full measure of that enemy, in this power struggle.
From that foundation, that deep, relentless, internal exposure of every trace of falsehood, is a good foundation to start from, since it then, over time, builds the necessary power that may currently be wasted chasing our tails, as ordered, and as we obey the order not to question those orders.
Someone can argue the point, that the battle is internal, first, but those types, it seems to me, are dictatorial, they know better than you do, they are your judge, and I see things quite differently, having won that power struggle.
Question everything.
At some point progress has to be made forward, expediently, and some things must be taken for granted, but it may yet be a good idea to reserve the right to sever your connections (to things taken for granted) when they begin to smell like a rat.
If you care to hear more from me, I can go on, and I think the best way to unravel the whole mess is to offer one obvious workable solution, and then have that base of operations to compare that which is the working power struggle now.
A.
That which is now.
B.
That which can be.
But, and again, how can any of those communications occur if language itself has been twisted beyond meaning - for the victims?
The Legal Criminals know the lies, or they too are soon to know the full measure of their powerlessness.