 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Please consider the words I am about to write, and if these words help, in any way, then consider passing on that help.
A person trained to be servile will be subject to that training, a subject, a weaker, dependent, powerless, subject of the producer, distributor, and perpetuating trainer, master, brain-washer, behavior modifier, response conditioner, dictator, criminal.
A person trained to be servile will fail to ask vital questions.
A person failing to ask vital questions will then fail to even look for accurate answers.
Failing to even look for accurate answers will render the person trained to be servile, trained to be powerless, and will be unable to employ accurate answers to vital questions.
An example may help.
Is it important to answer vital questions?
Yes, so long as the answer is accurate, as the answer can be employed productively.
How about another example?
How can I increase my standard of living, reduce my cost of living, and in so doing human life perpetuates instead of failing as I allow the opposite to occur?
Have you asked that question? Is it a vital question? If the answer is yes, and the answer is accurate, then you have an accurate answer that you can then employ, you can then work that productive answer for your own best interest.
Those who have stolen all the power produced by The Honest Productive People have used the power they stole to train their victims into believing that jobs are given to workers, as workers are a step down from employers, and these gifts of jobs are sure fire, tell tale, sound, and irrefutable evidence that hoists someone up higher and from lower, up from lowly worker status, up from the lowly worker class, up to the better, higher quality, brighter, wealthy, rich, and powerful employer class.
That is a story, and it is as false as the moon made of cheese. That lie leads to abject servitude.
Workers should be grateful for such bounty, such generosity, as employers give workers jobs.
Do you believe that lie?
Lick their boots.
Workers are trained to believe that more gifts are given to them, on top of the gift of employment, and this additional gift is called pay. Employers give the gift of jobs, and then, from a bottomless pit of generosity, employers spoil the targets of their limitless generosity with money, given to the workers, from the employers, paying the workers for the privilege of work.
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
Where did this story line come from, how did this arrangement occur, from what point did human beings exist, to get to this point, where there are now two groups of human beings instead of the one liberated group?
When group A offers an involuntary association to group B, and group B accepts, the race to the bottom begins, and that is the point of (seemingly) no return.
Return to the question:
How can I increase my standard of living, reduce my cost of living, and in so doing human life perpetuates instead of failing as I allow the opposite to occur?
Is that a vital question, worth gaining the power of having an accurate answer to employ in that specific work, on that road, having that goal in mind?
I am going to support the perspective I offer to you by way of linking another source of information, and from this source of information I will pick out quotes, and from those quotes I will unravel the lies behind the quote, and I will present to you a more accurate answer to the question asked, and from that accurate answer the person asking the question can then have an answer they can use, an answer that can be employed by the person asking the questions.
Don't wait for someone else to hand you questions and answers, if that is what you are trained to do, don't, instead, choose to employ yourself, employ your own power, ask your own questions, settle for nothing but an accurate answer, an accurate answer that you can employ, don't settle for duplicity, don't settle for contradiction, don't settle for the lesser of two evils, don't settle for an offer you can't (seemingly) refuse, don't settle for insanity, don't settle for less than an accurate, workable, useable, reasonable, and equitable answer, and in so doing you will be another example of liberty, another example of independence, another example of honest productive capacity, and the stuff you produce will be worth enough to add up to higher standards of living, and lower costs of living, so as to reverse the race to the bottom, and so as to ensure the survival of the human species for ever, if not longer. You will pass on honorable, honest, productive, human legacy, because that is what you are, as you settle for no less.
Why not?
Here is the link:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lewrockwell-show/2011/08/16/216-nixon-gold-and-ron-paul/
Here are the quotes:
"nobody could be trusted with the power to just print up unlimited numbers of new 100 dollar bills in your basement and spend them on what you want. Nobody can be trusted with that..."
"Ron Paul I think very correctly suggests as a baby step toward a sound money system: allowing competitive currencies, allow other things besides the dollar to be used legally and from a tax standpoint to have the same status as the dollar, that would be a huge step forward, that's the kind of thing we need to do and I think there is no question that gold will out compete everything else as money, just as it has for thousand and thousands of years."
How can I increase my standard of living, reduce my cost of living, and in so doing human life perpetuates instead of failing as I allow the opposite to occur?
Those who have been trained to be victims and criminals have a common bond and the common bond is falsehood. Their bond vanishes under the light of accurate discernment, as each potential victim is separated form each potential criminal once the bond of falsehood is broken, as the light of factual accurate perception shines through.
Note the first contradiction:
"nobody could be trusted with the power to just print up unlimited numbers of new 100 dollar bills in your basement and spend them on what you want. Nobody can be trusted with that..."
If no one can be trusted, then trade does not exist, and failing to know this is a huge failure.
If the question is this:
How can I increase my standard of living, reduce my cost of living, and in so doing human life perpetuates instead of failing as I allow the opposite to occur?
Then the accurate answer must include a means by which one person can trade with another person because one person, alone, disconnected from any other person within a productive connection, can produce much more than the bare essentials for survival, even when the single person is surrounded by natural wealth.
No single person, alone, can produce space travel, for example, so as to increase the survivability of the human species past the capacity of the Sun and the Earth to sustain life.
No single person, alone, can produce a steel sewing needle, let alone space travel, as such things as steel sewing needles are examples of years of human invention as human beings did, and do, in fact, manage to trade their individual productive powers so as to produce productive power that is more than the sum of all the individual parts.
If no one can be trusted, as the dictators say, in their effort to subject you to falsehood, or in whatever effort they have dreamed up, seeking whatever secret goal they may have in mind, if no one can be trusted, there then can be no productivity, as each individual is presented with an obstacle instead of an advantage, a road block is placed in place where a connecting avenue to prosperity would exist, a steep and insurmountable vertical wall is constructed instead of a gentle, natural, smooth road going downhill.
Without trust in your fellow man you are operating the very same operating system as every other dictator and criminal in human time. Men are bad, they say, and therefore exploiting them before they can exploit you is the only path, without exception. If you can't beat'em: join'em.
Joe, you say, you are taking those words out of context.
"nobody could be trusted with the power to just print up unlimited numbers of new 100 dollar bills in your basement and spend them on what you want. Nobody can be trusted with that..."
The contradiction confesses the lie. If no one can be trusted to create money, no one can be trusted to create money, I did not use the word, I quoted the word, the word choice is "nobody", and that either means "nobody" or it is a false front, a false word, a misdirection, willfully chosen, or merely parroted dogma, the answer is not accurate, and therefore the question is not answered.
How can I increase my standard of living, reduce my cost of living, and in so doing human life perpetuates instead of failing as I allow the opposite to occur?
The accurate answer includes whatever process manages to combine the individual powers into a power that is greater than the sum of all the parts which is, in one word, trade. Trade is a word that points to the process that is an answer to the question. Distrusting everyone is not the answer, and to distrust everyone for the willful crimes of a few is an accurate answer to a different question.
How can I increase my standard of living, reduce my cost of living, and in so doing my life perpetuates at the expense of the lives of other people?
Resort to deception, resort to threats of violence, and resort to aggressive violence upon the innocent ones who trust each other and are capable of producing more than they consume, and in that way you can increase your standard of living, reduce your cost of living, by lowering your victims standards of living, and by passing costs of your living onto your victims. Punish everyone for your crimes.
"nobody could be trusted with the power to just print up unlimited numbers of new 100 dollar bills in your basement and spend them on what you want. Nobody can be trusted with that..."
If that were true, which it is not, all men, and all women, all human beings, could not be trusted with power, for lack of any moral understanding, lack of any restraint of reason, all men, all women, all human beings will abuse power, without question, therefore nobody could be trusted with power. Except me of course.
Nobody can be trusted with that...except me. Except the Gold bugs who don't print money, they buy it, and where do they get the stuff needed to buy gold, or silver, or barrels of oil, or lies? If they can't be trusted, that is a fact, if someone else can be trusted, that is a fact, what is the idea behind punishing everyone for the crimes of a few?
There is more to this story provided by the quotes already offered. Repeated:
"Ron Paul I think very correctly suggests as a baby step toward a sound money system: allowing competitive currencies, allow other things besides the dollar to be used legally and from a tax standpoint to have the same status as the dollar, that would be a huge step forward, that's the kind of thing we need to do and I think there is no question that gold will out compete everything else as money, just as it has for thousand and thousands of years."
Note another contradiction as "a baby step" becomes "a huge step forward", and how does that happen in time and space?
A monopoly, or Cartel, is by definition the overpowering of competition, not exactly the complete destruction of all competition where ever and when ever competition arises, but a measurable absence of competition as monopoly defeats competition and the opposite is true as competition defeats monopoly like mass defeats space, like sunlight defeats darkness, and like warmth defeats cold.
A. Monopoly
B. Competition
One is not the other, one is opposite the other, and where one is the other is not, and here in good ole' U.S.A Inc. (LLC) there is a working legal money monopoly whereby the money can be as low in quality and as high in cost as the producer cares to make it because there is no force of internal competition causing the producer to increase quality and there is no internal force causing the producer to lower the cost and that fact is as measurable a fact as competitors are systematically forced out of business by the legal producers of the single legal money.
Internal competition in money markets is against the law, and in fact: "it shall not be questioned."
Joe, you may say, they are on the same page as you, why bicker over semantics?
If gold isn't forced by Gold Bugs to be the only legal money it won't be the highest quality money at the lowest cost and that is a measurable fact, so why do the Gold Bugs (tm) repeat such lies?
I think there is no question that gold will out compete everything else as money, just as it has for thousand and thousands of years.
That is an opinion followed by a false claim. Perhaps the claim is false on purpose, perhaps it is believed to be true while it is demonstrably false. When gold is scarce, in each and every case, those who have none have invented much better alternatives, and the quality of being better is such that the better money isn't scarce to the inventor of the alternative, as something useful is better than nothing at all. In each case where people who have gold, as sure as can be, and measurably so, gold is very good money, for them, so long as they have it, and therefore it is good for them, when they have it, and that makes a lot of sense. Gold can be confiscated, it has been confiscated, and for reasons that remain clear, to anyone who cares to answer those vital questions.
How many people who have no gold, no gold certificates, no gold futures, no gold receipts, and no desire for gold, are inclined to trust that gold is the best money, "that gold with out compete everything else as money" as the dogmatic claim suggests? Even if they say yes, yes, gold is the best money, while they have none, while they fail to get any, while they continue to trade without gold, their actions confess the truth, as gold escapes their command.
What happens if Ron Paul adds one more competitor on the list of legal tender competitors?
1. Federal Reserve System of Extortion products a.k.a dollar denominated legal units of debt
2. Gold
There is where I am in full agreement with the dogma offered by the Gold Bugs as the obvious facts will become obvious when that legal competition is no longer against the law.
Where the agreement ends is as obvious.
1. Federal Reserve System of Extortion products a.k.a dollar denominated legal units of debt
2. Gold
3. Anyone can print their own legal money anytime, at their own cost.
What I have just handed to you is an accurate answer to the question asked at the beginning of this effort to communicate to the masses of humanity.
How can I increase my standard of living, reduced my cost of living, and in so doing life perpetuates instead of me allowing the opposite to occur?
You don't see the answer?
You have to ask the question. You have to settle for nothing less than the highest quality answer, at the lowest cost. Ask, and then get the answer. When you find the answer, please consider passing it on.
When competition is the power exerting the most force then everyone who can compete competes, without the force of deceit preventing some competitors, forcing them out of business fraudulently.
When competition is the power exerting the most force then everyone who can compete competes, without the force of threats of violence preventing some competitors, forcing them out of business.
When competition is the power exerting the most force then everyone who can compete competes, without the force of aggressive violence preventing some competitors, forcing them out of business.
The force of deceit claims that Gold will dominated and corner the market, and monopolize money markets, and it is deceit in play, as a power, as that power forces some competitors that can compete out of business.
1. Dollars
2. Gold
3. Silver
4. Any competitor can invent, produce, and maintain a competitive form of money, absent the force of deceit preventing any one competitor, absent the force of threats of violence preventing any one competitor, and absent the force of aggressive violence preventing one competitor.
Which money will be the highest quality and lowest cost of the first 3 on the list, if all other competitors are outlawed? Throw the Gold Bugs a bone.
What happens if a very few people start buying up all the gold and in time their plan follows through and the execution phase of the plan completes on schedule, and very few people soon own almost all the gold, and almost everyone is excluded from the club of gold owners?
Where do they get the money they need to buy the gold? Is that a vital question? Does it matter if all other competitors are against the law? What if dollars, gold, and silver are all included in the legal competition to gain the most market share in legal money in good ole' U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)?
A few people gather up almost all the gold, which causes an effective greater scarcity of gold, and therefore the price of gold will increase, assuming that the demand stays the same, or increases, demand increases, more people born, more people needing money, more people having no money, more people convinced in the belief that they have to pay taxes, more people requiring the stuff needed for survival, more people wanting higher standards of living, and more people wanting lower costs of living, and less, and less, and less gold is available, as fewer people have it, and as a few people buy up as much gold as they can possibly accumulate in time. What happens to the value of the dollar, and what happens to the value of silver, as the plan to manipulate the gold supply follows through the execution phase when those 3, and only those 3, forms of legal money are not made illegal, when tax payers can pay taxes with dollars, or gold, or silver, when all debits (tax debt in particular) public, and private, are legally payable with either of those three legal forms of legal tender, according to the authorities, and the Gold Bugs.
1. Dollars continue to be supplied by the legal criminals running The Federal Reserve System of Extortion, and they continue to double, and cut in half, the dollar money amount in circulation.
2. Gold flows from the many to the few who employ that answer to their problem of loosing control over their victims, as they execute their gold accumulation scheme.
3. Silver offers a competitive quality money, at a competitive cost (until it too is targeted for exploitation by a few powerful people, as those powerful people may or may not have gained their power through fraud, threats of violence, and aggressive violence upon the innocent)
As the quality of the dollar plummets during the next BOOM phase of increasing the money supply by any word, or fraud, or deceit, or lie, used, and as Gold is manipulated by a few powerful people into a state of extreme scarcity, and as silver is not yet targeted for manipulation, what happens to the dominance of The Dollar, or Gold, as Silver remains free from deceit, free from threats of violence, and free from manipulation by a few as a means of gaining at the expense of the many?
If you happen to be a laborer and you happen to know that money competition is now legal, pretending now that it is legal, and you happen to be watching the horse race, to see which money becomes the best money, you may decide to be paid in Gold, as gold becomes more and more scarce, and what does the employer say about your choice to be paid in gold during that experiment in competitive legal money supplies?
I have no gold, my customers have no gold, my suppliers are demanding gold, I can't pay you in gold, but, if you want to keep working here, love it or leave it, you can be paid in dollars or silver.
What is the legal exchange rate?
You didn't ask.
You don't know how to ask vital questions on your own, since you have been trained to be a victim.
It is against the law to question the money monopoly, and you obey.
The legal money competition race starts hypothetically:
1000 dollar units are worth 1 gold unit
100 dollars is worth 1 silver
10 silver is worth 1 gold
How free is the market? The legal criminals give you jobs, they give you pay for allowing you to work, and they now give you three choices, from the depths of their bottomless hearts of gold, and they give you rules governing your money, and they say you can pay your debts with any of those three competitive money supplies, and each will be exactly as valuable as they say, on that first day, until you are told differently.
Gold is accumulated according to a plan hatched by a very few powerful people for the next 10 years and the dollar competitor, for some strange reason, does not change the supply of dollars at all, for 10 years, and no one has added to, or subtracted from the silver supply, to any degree of significance, during those 10 years - what happens after 10 years?
2 Trillion dollars in circulation (after The Federal Reserve System of Extortion people ordered the amount doubled in 2008 from 1 to 2 Trillion) and that amount remains 2 Trillion for 10 years.
1 Million units of gold are in circulation at the start and 1/2 a million units are in circulation after the Gold Bugs accumulate half of it, and that half is kept out of circulation by those members of the Gold Bug club.
10 million units of Silver are in circulation a the start and 10 million units of silver are in circulation at the end of 10 years.
Start
2T dollars = 1m gold
1m gold = 10m silver
10m silver. = 2T dollars
10 Years later with a fixed exchange rate - fixed by law
2T dollars = 1m gold (half taken out of circulation)
1m gold = 10m silver
10m silver = 2T dollars
If the rules handed down to you from your benevolent dictators peg the three legal money competitors to a gold standard, as such above, there isn't any sense in manipulating the supply of gold by buying up and taking out of circulation significant amounts of the whole, no one cares, pay me in either, they are all the same, who cares? You have no gold, who cares, pay me in silver, it is as good as gold.
What happens if the benevolent dictators change the rules after 10 years, according to their schedule, and after the insiders follow through with the plan to buy up and accumulate, and take out of circulation, half of the gold supply?
Now, they say, it is time to return to a free market?
What happens to the value of gold compared to the value of the dollar, and the value of silver at that point in time?
2T dollars = 1/2m gold
1/2m gold = 100m silver
100m silver = 2T dollars
Those who have the gold stored can buy up all the dollars, or all the silver, with 1/2 the gold supply. What if they buy up 1/2 the dollars and 1/2 of the silver over the next period of 10 years?
Peg the value first?
What happens if the value is not pegged at the start?
Start
2T dollars = 1m gold
1m gold = 100m silver
100m silver. = 2T dollars
Day two, for an example, someone, or some group, buy 1/2 the gold supply on the first day. What happens to the exchange rate as a result of that manipulation of those three legal money competitors during the experimental competition in legal money markets, whereby no law enforces a fixed rate of exchange?
Suppose someone blows the whistle, to you, and no one else knows yet, just you and the insiders, just you and those who are causing the reduction of gold in circulation by half the total supply, and you have a choice to pay taxes with gold, silver, or dollars - what do you pay your taxes with, when you are one of the few people who know the current, significant, manipulation of the gold supply?
Suppose you have the following saved up after 10 years of hard labor, and then you hear the news about the gold supply manipulation:
1000 dollars worth of dollars saved
1 unit of gold saved
100 units of silver saved
Do you pay taxes with gold, since you want the tax collectors to be more powerful in their work, at your expense? Do you choose to get paid in gold, and do you grow suspicious when your employer begins to offer special treatment for employees who choose to be paid in dollars or in silver while the employer keep his, or her, gold closer to their black hearts?
Is there a published exchange rate each week in the newspaper, or a clock on the local bank, where the current exchange rate is broadcast to the entire world, including you, and it does not yet show the affect of the insider news you have, as half of the gold supply is secretly stashed away by a select, exclusive, few, very powerful people?
Is your pay automatically adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate as the three competitors gain and lose quality and cost, and if it is not done accurately, you simply choose to have your debts paid to you in the currency you think is higher in quality, and lower in cost to you, no matter what the authorities claim?
The big leap forward does occur when competition forces the quality of money up and the cost of money down, by any report, by any words, that happens, and I can see that fact, and I don't need Ron Paul telling me, and I certainly don't need the Gold Bugs telling me it is a baby step, I don't need an employer telling me, since that simple fact is self evidently true, as competition does what it does, even if I don't like it, even if I refuse to see it, it is what it is, it does what it does, and it does not depend upon my permission to be what it is, and to do what it does.
Why, though, would anyone, ever, claim that any competitor who can compete is not allowed to compete? What is the true purpose of excluding some competitors, forcing them out of business while subsidizing the special interests?
Stumped?
Remember this:
How can I increase my standard of living, reduced my cost of living, and in so doing life perpetuates instead of me allowing the opposite to occur?
What is the answer?
Remember this:
"nobody could be trusted with the power to just print up unlimited numbers of new 100 dollar bills in your basement and spend them on what you want. Nobody can be trusted with that..."
If a three way legal competition works to improve money, what is the full measure of force when any money can compete?
Remember this:
1. Dollars
2. Gold
3. Silver
4. Any competitor can invent, produce, and maintain a competitive form of money, absent the force of deceit preventing any one competitor, absent the force of threats of violence preventing any one competitor, and absent the force of aggressive violence preventing one competitor.
What do you think is a stock or share in a company?
What do you think is a personal check?
What do you think is good faith and credit?
If you want to answer your question with your answer, if that is what you want, how much do you want it, and why can't you print up your own money, at your own cost, and as ong as your good faith and credit is good, isn't it good? Why would your money be any less, or any more, valuable than the next competitor? According to whose authority?
If the force that causes you to do good is a force acting on you, shared by no one else, where no one else is punished for your mistakes, and no one forces you to be punished for their mistakes, what do you call that, and if you don't have a word for that, I do, and the word is equity.
Suppose you wanted to build Solar Panels for sale? What stops you from printing 100 receipts for one of your Solar Panels each and you sell those to suppliers who can sell those receipts to people who want Solar Panels. You start with nothing, you get the supplies you need, you build the Solar Panels, and your money returns to you as you are the source of your money, and you money is what you produce to start your business, and your money is designed to be used, by your future customers, in exchange for the source of your good faith and credit, in exchange for your competitive production, and you are in business, and you use your own good faith and credit, and if your credit isn't worth anything, your money will be worth nothing, and you go out of business, and you pay the cost, and those who bought your money buy the certain knowledge that you are not an honest productive person, which would be their own mistake, a mistake they don't pass onto anyone else, and you can make good your reputation in some other way, if you want a good reputation, if you can earn one after you had earned a bad reputation by your own failure. No collective punishment. No power expended by any external powers to protect those from themselves, no one to blame, other than those who are responsible for any blame.
What is the exchange rate of your money at the start? Why would your first sale of your first 100 receipts, as claims on your future production, measure up to anyone as being of any value whatsoever? No one told them that your money was good, you have to do that, as they may be trained into a belief that only one money is any good, and that is the wall placed in front of you so that you are rendered powerless as a competitor. They are trained to believe that no one can be trusted, they are good subjects. Why can't you convince someone that you can produce something of value, as good as anyone else, or better, if given the chance, and why does it require permission from someone to start down that road? What road block is in the way of anyone offering any competitive answer to the question once it is asked and then an answer is offered to anyone else?
What was the exchange rate on a Google share at the start? Why are Google shares not accepted as tax payments? If you buy Solar Panels sufficient to produce more than you consume, enough to sell excess power, why is your power, added to the grid, not a measure of tax payment - legally? Why do you have to wait to save up money to start such a business? If your start up costs are your own printed money, in the form of stocks, shares, or dirty toilet paper with your promise on it, your money will be as good, or as bad, as you can earn your own good faith and credit. You can do that now, what stops you?
The move from monopoly to competition is not a baby step, it is the definition of regime change, and it is the peaceful version of regime change, it is the method of regime change that does not resort to deceit, and does not resort to threats of violence, and does not resort to aggressive violence like torture and mass murder upon the multitudes of innocent victims as the collective punishment price paid for the perpetuation of legal money monopoly.
The idea that there is a monopoly, despite all the evidence proving otherwise, is the wall in place, and as soon as enough people wake up seeing past that false front, it vanishes.
"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
— Henry Ford