 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Paul Crag Roberts claims that financial regulation must be returned to the former level of what it was once, in so many words, what does that really mean?
I cannot speak for him.
I can say that the idea is flawed.
The dollar is a fraud, any effort to support it is an effort to support a fraud, and therefore those who do so participate in fraud, and they can do so knowing that it is a fraud, and they can do so ignorantly.
What happens if honest money is allowed to compete, instead of supporting the fraud that is the dollar system of legal extortion?
Ron Paul, for example, does not say that the solution is to reinforce regulations.
Why?
I can't speak for Ron Paul either.
A.
Support legal fraud, by reinforcing the regulations that regulate legal fraud.
B.
Return back to an interpretation of The Constitution whereby honest money is allowed to compete alongside anyone's effort to enforce monetary fraud.
Which money will anyone choose once it is lawful to choose something other than the lesser of two evils?
1.
No currency, no connection between honest productive people.
2.
Currency that connects honest productive people while the same currency connects the legal criminals and the legal victims to the honest productive people.
3.
Invent, and maintain, an honest, competitive legal currency, or two, or three, or however many new forms of currency are invented and offered to consumers, as the demand for higher quality currency, and lower cost currency, inspires invention, improvement, production, and maintenance, of better, and better, and better, legal currency.
Notice how many people, including Paul Craig Roberts, including Alex Jones, and including almost everyone, universally, as if there is only one, monopoly, viewpoint, one, claim, that failure of the dollar is bad for the economy.
Why?
If there is only 2 options, where one option is much worse than the other bad option, reason, logic, and commons sense demands a third option.
1.
No currency, no connection between honest productive people.
2.
Currency that connects honest productive people while the same currency connects the legal criminals and the legal victims to the honest productive people.
3.
Invent, and maintain, an honest, competitive legal currency, or two, or three, or however many that are invented and offered as the demand for higher quality currency, and lower cost currency, inspired invention, improvement, production, and maintenance of better, and better, and better legal currency.
If I can invent a third option, you can. If Ron Paul can invent a third, and forth option, you can. If we can, you, Ron Paul, me, and who knows who else, can, then there are many other options.
What power is in place whereby other options are off the table, not discussed, not proposed, not worked toward, not on the schedule, not on the calender, not in the works, not ready to implement, not perused, ignored, sent to the corn field, banished, exiled, outlawed, removed, censored, killed, murdered, tortured, and removed from thought, erased from history, gone, forever?
What is the interest in removing competitive invention? What is the power that kills higher quality life and lowering costs of life?
Alex Jones is helping advertise gold and silver sales.
Who has enough surplus power to buy gold and silver?
Did you hear Paul Craig Roberts speak about CEOs, spending a few years before retirement, raiding corporations, earning million dollars bonuses, so as to retire comfortably?
They have surplus wealth sufficient to be looking for secure storage mediums, like gold, and silver.
How about the hired liars, the politicians who claim that we are broke, and that we are getting even more broke?
They have surplus wealth sufficient to be looking for secure storage mediums, like gold, and silver.
What will they use to pay their electric bills?
They won't have one if they buy solar panels.
What will they use to pay their gas bill, their gasoline expenses, running their cars?
They won't have one if they buy an electric car that runs on their home grown electricity.
What will they use to pay their mortgage interest payments?
They won't have mortgage interest payments if they can afford to pay cash for a property title, free of interests.
What will they use to pay their taxes?
Are you kidding me? What do you think interest is?
Anyway you want to slice it, think, first, about one possible honest money competitor, as an illustration, not as an enforced monopoly.
Product 1 can be:
No interest loans on home mortgages for those honest productive people who earn no interest since they earn good faith and credit, which is supposedly the same good faith and credit backing the dollar crime spree. Product 1 is also no interest mortgage loans on business property loans, so honest productive people can start a business and do so without having to pay for someone else's special interest.
Product 2 can be:
1 percent interest loans, to the same people consuming Product 1, for the purchase of things that are currently proven to be net wealth producers by a specific measure of accurate data, such as, a solar panel, and such as, an electric car, and such as, a modular vertical greenhouse farming unit which can make algae based motor fuel that is cheaper than gasoline, fuel that can replace gasoline in cars that use gasoline now, without any modification to the existing cars that use gasoline now, and the same modular units can make food cheaper than food on the shelf at the store, better food, at lower cost, to name just 3 examples of things that can be formulated accurately as net producer investments for Product 2 loans.
What would Product 1, and Product 2 loans do for the American, and the world, Economy; relative to the impending doom day scenario so often reported by so many people, relentlessly?
Each honest productive person consuming Product 1 has more power each month, to spend, to invest, or to save, each month, amounting to roughly half of the current cost of living in an interest bearing mortgaged home.
Each honest productive person consuming Product 2 has more power each month in direct proportion to how many net producer products are purchased with Product 2 loans.
Honest money becomes available to all the honest productive people as the new money, circulates as currency, and how many people will jerk their knee at this point and claim "inflation" as if that word has any relevance to this illustration of how honest money can out compete the legal monopoly fraud money?
Each new unit of currency is backed by actual productive property, therefore there is no inflation. If there is inflation, the inflation will be a result of people who continue to accept, and exchange, the fraudulent money, if that is their choice, since that money will be backed by what it is backed, which is military might, oil, and lies.
As people ween off of oil, there will be a steady decline in the demand for it.
As people ween off oil, there will be a steady decline in the demand for the aggressive wars for profit that are employed to secure oil interests (which back the fraudulent dollar interest).
As people ween off the lies, there will be less demand for lies, and the dollar value plummets while the value of honest money remains exactly as valuable as the homes, businesses, and productivity of the things that back the new honest money.
You think, now. Do it.
Stop depending upon other brains.
They are stealing your mind, thought by thought, and replacing your thoughts with lies.
Is that good enough for you?