 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Honest Productive Americans,
The brain trust at Gold Bug center have put their heads together so as to solve the money problems facing all of you honest productive Americans, and if you believe that, I'd like to know how you believe that, because I don't.
Question:
So, let me ask you the same question, do you see any way out? Are there any options left to the government that don’t lead to economic chaos?
Non-answer (reading from the false script):
If by some miracle the people who run the government decided that Big Government was a bad idea and small government was a much better idea, and so they set about ending government programs and pushing the level of federal spending way down, along with the level of regulation over the economy, then there would be a way out.
But how likely is that to happen? The time horizon for people in politics is maybe one or two years, just about the same length of time there is before the next election. Their goal is always to survive the coming election. That means what is rational for the politicians looks irrational to everyone else, and I don’t see any reason to expect that to change. The purpose of a politician examining a problem is not to solve the problem but to find a way for someone else to get blamed for it.
How can someone claim to be an authority on money in U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) and be asked that question, and then not aim directly at the FOMC?
Politicians have no power to add double the number of legal money units, and that is what the people at The Federal Reserve System of Legal Extortion have done, and that person who answered that question knows that, had just reported that, and then when asked about impending "economic chaos", the answer dodged the actual people responsible for willfully causing the chaos, and the answer points to the hired goons in the so called "government".
Do you see a problem with the supposed, authoritative, expert, professional answer?
I do.
The false script goes on to finger you guys, all you honest productive people in America, are fingered, can you believe it? Look:
Doug and I have both written about the fact that we are living in a steadily degrading democracy at this point, with the public voting itself all manner of benefits from the public trough. Personally, I don’t see how we get to the point where politicians, where the voters, decide that a much smaller government is a much better way to go. At least not unless and until we're forced to. Do you think this situation can drag on, or will the size of the debt and deficits force a change sooner rather than later?
How many people actually vote? Are you going to believe the poll numbers published by the same people who stand to gain by fingering all of you honest productive American people as the guilty ones, the ones who are causing the march toward "economic chaos"?
How many people actually vote? I ran for congress, in my 40th district California, and I'll get those figures published by that State office:
http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/1996/96Stat.htm
40. Jerry Lewis, Republican----------- 98,821
Robert `Bob' Conaway, Democrat 44,102
Joseph T. Kelley, Libertarian------- 4,375
142,298 Total votes
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/findyourreps.xpd?state=CA&district=41
Note: The District numbers have been changed since 1996, 40 is now 41, and I didn't know that until now. I don't vote. I happen to know that voting is a scam, it is rigged in more ways than one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California%27s_41st_congressional_district
Population (2000) 639,088
Vote count (1996) 142,298
http://www.onlineconversion.com/percentcalc.htm
22% of the Total Population according to those sources, admittedly not accurate.
Supposing then, that the votes are not rigged, and supposing that only half of the population is allowed to vote, and rounding up from 44% to 50% or the legal voting public, leaves 50% who cannot, in any way, be held accountable for what those legal criminals have done, as they obey whoever pays them to cause mayhem at the National level.
Back to the quote:
Doug and I have both written about the fact that we are living in a steadily degrading democracy at this point, with the public voting itself all manner of benefits from the public trough. Personally, I don’t see how we get to the point where politicians, where the voters, decide that a much smaller government is a much better way to go. At least not unless and until we're forced to. Do you think this situation can drag on, or will the size of the debt and deficits force a change sooner rather than later?
Do you see that?
the public voting itself all manner of benefits from the public trough
That is called collective punishment, in the form of a guilty verdict handed down from that authority upon all who constitute The Public, which is you, me, and every other breathing person, found guilty, and publicly tried, convicted, and sentenced, drug through the mud, how does it feel?
You are guilty.
Did you have your day in court? Were you judged by 12 randomly selected members of the same public, where any one of those jurors has the power to acquit you of all charges, based solely upon his, or her, absolute power to judge both the morality of the law, and your guilt or innocence?
No, you are guilty, that is it. Shut up. You have already been punished, go cry in the corner.
Who claims that these guys are in any position to solve this impending "economic chaos" problem? How much does someone get paid, with your earnings, to come up with this script, and how much does someone else get paid, again with your earnings, to parrot these fables?
"Economic chaos" is the agenda, and the FOMC, or whoever pulls their strings, cause it, on purpose, and there isn't anyone in the public that has the power to do anything about it, legally, or otherwise, unless they too resort to deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence, and manages to get away with doing so, to accomplish the goal.
Product 1 and Product 2 solves that problem, as earlier explained, and those are just illustrated examples of how to solve the problem with legal competition in money markets, competition fixes the problem, since the problem is an enforced monopoly, and it does not take an expert Gold Bug, or Austrian Economics Professor, or Politician, or Private Banker, to know the simple truth.
So I think job number one is to understand what's going on, so that you’re not blindly relying on anyone's advice.
So, how about explaining what is going on? The legal criminals are destroying the power to create power, because too much power empowers the victims with enough power to avoid being victims. Sure, education is a power, but so is money, and so those legal criminals have all the power over legal money, just ask one, Ron Paul does, what answer does Ron Paul get?
Lies.
Lead on - liars.
Where does that go?
Job number two, if you see the world as I see it, is to make sure that a substantial share of your wealth is in precious metals and perhaps in foreign currencies, but without any leverage.
How many of the non-voting, honest, productive, American people are now unable to keep any of their surplus wealth, have no savings, have only mortgage debts, at interest, credit card debts, at interest, business loan debts, at interest, student loans, at interest, and more work hours, and less to show for it, and more work hours still, and even less to show for it, and higher taxes, and higher prices, and more injuries, and fewer customers, and less competition forcing higher quality and lower cost, especially in legal money markets, how many of those people, are in any position to buy precious metals, at today's prices, or foreign currencies that can't be use to pay debt in good ole' U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)?
Few.
Those Gold Bugs are an elite group, who still, even now, have vast sums of savings, interest earning savings, even savings earned by interest payments, and is it any wonder that their claims of "artificial interest rates" means the same thing as: "My interest earning investments are not paying as much as I prefer."?
Do you have a clue?
It may be well past time to get one.