 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Perhaps more of the 'concept' put forth in the Constitution
Overcast,
This:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html
Article. I.
Section. 8.
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
That led directly to this:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amendments_11-27.html
AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
Those words are not the actual actions, the actual actions prove the meaning of those words. Those words are merely words that enable specific actions.
Numbers are merely numbers, as numbers account for the actual actions that are enabled by mere words.
Example:
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Words and numbers account for the actual willful actions perpetrated by actual people.
Perhaps more of the 'concept' put forth in the Constitution
Which concept are you referring to; where are those words in that enabling document? Which words led to which actions?
Regardless of the politics of the time, a concept of a free nation and free market was born. That is what counts to me.
When was a concept of a free nation and free market born?
A time existed during which people fled persecution by criminals running criminal governments in England and Europe, and those religious and political refugees fled to the North American Continent. During which time many people struggled and then prospered, according to more than one source, they prospered, in part, because they invented and maintained competitive legal currencies, then called Colonial Script. The people running the criminal government in England ordered those honest productive Americans to obey involuntary tax laws, and the legal criminals enforced monopoly legal currency laws, and then the honest productive Americans disobeyed those laws, and then the honest productive Americans had to fight the invasion of those legal criminals as they conducted an aggressive war for profit upon those honest productive Americans.
When is that historical time period does that free nation and free market become a free nation and free market? When did that free nation and free market come into being, at that time, before that time, or after that time?
If you are claiming that the free nation and free market came into being after that time, as in the time when The Constitution usurped the voluntary union of 13, or so, separate and sovereign states, then I'm puzzled as to such a claim, since the actual evidence proves otherwise.
A test case, of a free market, occurred on the occasion when, after the British legal criminals were driven out of America, and before the new legal criminals usurped a working voluntary union of separate and sovereign states, with The Constitution fraud, when, a group of free men, ex-revolutionary war veterans, continued the revolutionary war, by defending their liberty against a runaway criminal government, then committing legal crimes under the color of a law that was being perpetrated by criminals running the Massachusetts State government. That test case was later called, by the victors, as the victors rewrite history, as Shays's Rebellion.
The test case proved the validity of a Democratic Federated Republican form of government, as the rebels, who lost that battle for liberty, and fled to Vermont, and were then allowed to remain free in Vermont, as Vermont offered a much higher quality government, at a much lower cost, compared to the criminal government, run by legal criminals, in Massachusetts.
The news of the continued effort to defend against legal crime, to fight for liberty, and to continue the war for independence, spread, and was especially well understood by the settlers on the frontiers, and the legal criminals both. One group saw the events known as Shays's Rebellion as cause to continue the fight for liberty, and against criminal governments, while the other group saw a serious threat to their monopoly control over law and money. Both sides regrouped in preparation for further hostilities, as the war for independence continued.
The legal criminal resorted to deceit, to threats of violence, and then acts of violence, false flags included.
Those on the frontier, having lost their power over money, to the legal criminals, invented competitive currencies, including whiskey, which could be distilled as as separate product on farms, and then used as money, in the absence of Colonial Script, and in the absence of Gold, both competitive currencies were made scarce at the time, due to abuses, and tactics, used by the emerging legal crime organizations.
Those legal criminals hatched a plan behind closed doors, by which they would sell a solution to a problem they had created, and the solution would be what they called a Consolidated Government, based upon the previous Monarchy - complete with a open door to create any other legal powers imaginable, since the plan hatched included the necessary property then known as constructive interpretation. The enabling document had to be ambiguous to a point of meaninglessness, leaving the power of adding meaning in the hands of those who are enabled by that document.
That was The Constitutional Convention. It authorized the suppression of rebellion, it killed the spirit of liberty, it made the fight for liberty unlawful.
The record of that fraud survives, despite all efforts by the legal criminals, the victors, as they rewrote history, and continued to control the ignorant masses with the lies they invented, are inventing, and will continue to invent, perfect, and disseminate, to their exclusive profit, and to the detriment of every one of their victims, past, present, and future.
Failing to know the facts, is ignorance of the facts, not so bad, but claiming to know the facts, without doubt, without a welcome challenge from any perspective, is willful ignorance, in the face of evidence that contests the validity of the supposed facts.
Regardless of the politics of the time, a concept of a free nation and free market was born.
If you are seriously referring to The Constitution, as evidence supporting an accurate accounting for the beginning of a free nation and free market, then your evidence, as shown above, is the exact opposite.
The Constitution cannot be questioned. That is a thought crime, to question The Constitution, and there are plenty of enforcers more than wiling to shout me down, as I show, as a matter of fact, the actual document, out-laws the thought of questioning it.
The words are published by the authorities on the official web page.
You can leave me completely out of the data, there is no need to shoot me as the messenger, it is The Constitution's own supporters document, their own words, that expose their own belief in their own false claims. The Constitution was designed by Monarchists, Nationalists, Dupes, and legal criminals, for reasons, and the reasons were meticulously exposed by the opponents of that fraud, that false front, that Nation State hidden behind a false advertisement campaign known as The Federalist Papers.
It's own author, James Madison, a dupe, too late realized he had been had, and later set to the task of defending against it, with his part in the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions, in a too little, and too late, attempt to reignite the defense of liberty.
Too bad for the victims, the hero's of past fights for liberty failed, what to do now?
Continue to pay tribute to falsehood?
Seriously?