 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Honest Productive Americans,
Above is a link to an article that can be measured as a voice from the left, and I have a problem with such things. Is the term "left" a usable term?
The writer explains the meaning of his voice in greater detail than a sound bite:
Progressives people, designated as “the Left,” believe that the poor are victims of the rich and the prerogatives of wealthy and powerful interests should be done away with. They believe labor unions should be strengthened and the rights of working people expanded; the environment should be rigorously protected; racism, sexism, and homophobia should be strenuously fought; and human services should be properly funded.
My problem with the term "left" is similar to my problem with the more detailed explanation quoted above, and my problem concerns the accuracy of the message. If someone, anyone, wants to do away with the prerogatives of wealthy and powerful interests, then what does that mean, exactly?
If that means:
Invent, and maintain, a competitive legal currency, and in so doing, do away with the prerogatives of the wealthy and powerful interests who have gained their power by inventing and maintaining a legal crime money monopoly which causes all forms of wealth and power to flow to those few people through that legal monopoly currency extortion racket, which is now known as The Federal Reserve System, then, if that is the goal, how can that accurate message be any different than the same message coming from the supposed "right"?
Where do the interests of the poor and wealthy people meet? How does anyone measure wealth?
Not having any is a measure.
Having so much that the commander of extreme wealth can get away with massive torture, serial killing, and mass murder perpetually is a measure.
What is the unit of measure?
What is wealth?
Too many questions?
From the link:
In the political realm, the further left one goes on the opinion spectrum the more difficult it is to gain exposure and access to larger audiences. Strenuously excluded from the increasingly concentrated corporate-owned media are people on the Left who go beyond the conservative-liberal orthodoxy and speak openly about the negative aspects of big capital and what it does to people at home and abroad.
That is not a phenomenon that is exclusive to the so called "left". Try gaining access to popular news media channels with the message that the legal criminals running U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) perpetrated the destruction of three buildings in New York City on September 11th 2001, so as to launch a new regime change campaign in The Middle East, and other reasons of similar power transferring profit motives.
That is one of my last messages offered to the Austrian Economics Forum, before that popular news medial channel censored my messages.
When a message threatens the power of someone, in simple terms, there is a knee jerk reaction called up within the individuals who are threatened, and that reaction is one of censorship.
How about a joke to illustrate the point?
The sheep herder, who is of good standing within the local community, but who has had his way with the sheep, often enough, is met by a reporter claiming that sheep can talk. What does the sheep herder say when asked about the talking sheep?
"Those sheep lie!"
How is there any difference between a workers union and any other legal collection of power? Many people send their individual power to a central location where all the individual measures of power are collected, for a reason, and once enough power is collected, the power is used to accomplish a goal.
How are labor unions not wealthy? How are labor unions not interested in gaining something? How complicated can the power struggle get when the victims fail to accurately understand the true nature of it; while the legal criminals remain in command of that powerful knowledge, and while the legal criminals use that power to make damn sure that no one else knows those exclusive realizations?
The power over law is not worth a dime without the power over surplus wealth, and although the power over law was, and is, used to gain control over the power over surplus wealth, law is not necessary, for the victims to regain control over their power over the surplus wealth they alone create.
The power over surplus wealth is a power that connects each individual person who creates surplus wealth with each other individual person who creates surplus wealth, and that connection can be exclusive to honest productive people, or that connection can allow, welcome, and offer access to legal criminals, and once that connection between the honest productive people and the legal criminals is made what do you think happens?
This is not news.
Read history:
http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm
Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer.
Once power begins flowing from the honest productive people who create it, to the legal criminals, the honest productive people grow weaker and the legal criminals grow stronger, and that stolen power is used to keep that power flowing in that direction, accelerating the rate of flow, and even accelerating the rate of acceleration of that flow, until the rate of that flow is measurable as such:
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Sever the connection and what happens?
Think.
Don't just jerk your knee.
The connection connects all the honest productive people to each other AND connects all the honest productive people to the legal criminals. If the connection is gone, or if it rendered useless ("Economic Collapse"), there is no longer any capacity, no longer an power, to create surplus wealth, not within that group of honest productive people who were formerly connected to each other.
If only the legal criminals are disconnected from the honest productive people, what happens?
What is so difficult about inventing, and maintaining, an honest money?
The victims are not allowed to even know what can happen when the victims regain their power, over their own thoughts first, and then over their power to create and employ surplus wealth.
When the host is dying of anemia, because too many parasites are killing the host, is it time to seek membership in the parasite gang?