 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I disagree with this. The current reign of terror can still be in existence with or without competition. Whoever has the what is defined as being "a lot of money" (as George Humphrey once stated, "we're not talking about the millionaire down the street, you can't even be a member of their club unless you are a billionaire) can still bring about terror for money = power and a lot of money = a lot of power.
sereneesam,
Do you disagree with what I wrote, or do you disagree with your misunderstanding of what I wrote?
Here is what you quoted (and then respond with "I disagree with this"):
That is competition, and that is how competition becomes competition in reality, and if you continue to look away from legal monetary competition every time I point at it, as if you were a baby being fed a spoon full of spinach that you abhor, then the point about how legal non-criminal monetary competition ends the current reign of terror will be very difficult to see, as you continue to refuse to look at it.
You go on to explain how you disagree with "this" by saying:
The current reign of terror can still be in existence with or without competition.
How can you measure your disagreement with "this"?
Here is a measure of "this" as it is reported by the people running "this":
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
That, in fact, ends when "this" can no longer be "The Dollar Hegemony" and many people are now claiming that the end of "this" is going to be something along the lines of "World Wide Economic Collapse" or some other such "Headlines".
In fact: "this" ends because of legal, criminal, competition. The more deceptive, more threatening, and more violent criminal cabal steals the legal monopoly, and a new set of power criminals take over the world wide legal crime money monopoly power from "The Dollar Hegemony", and the actual people involved may be the same people on the top 10 or so, while many of the members of the "insiders club" may be left holding an empty bag, once the "better" criminals competitively take over the "World Reserve Currency" power.
What is the measure of your disagreement with "this"? What do you disagree with - exactly?
Crime is competitive as criminals compete with each other over their limited supply of ready victims; and that is one form, or one level, of competition. Do you disagree with that?
Crime also has a competitor knowable as defenders of liberty, or not-so-ready victims, and that is the point that you appear to be unable to grasp; so how can you disagree with something that you are unable to grasp, comprehend, understand, know, acknowledge, see, perceive, and measure?
If honest productive Americans unite and begin using their own form of currency, and they produce, and they maintain, a currency that excludes the criminals, divorces the criminal connection, severs the link between the honest productive Americans and the legal criminals, then how do you think those legal criminals are going to fill their bank accounts?
This:
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
If honest productive Americans unite and begin using their own form of currency; who has any concern, or interest, in that abomination measured above?
This:
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Do you disagree with that, above? Do you have an argument against the existence of what that official measure measures?
You go on to respond, as if you disagree with something, and your words are quoted:
Whoever has the what is defined as being "a lot of money" (as George Humphrey once stated, "we're not talking about the millionaire down the street, you can't even be a member of their club unless you are a billionaire) can still bring about terror for money = power and a lot of money = a lot of power.
What is the source of the power in question? I think you are speaking about something called "Surplus Wealth", and that power is the source of the "power to purchase", or the "value of money", or the stuff of value that fills bank accounts, the real stuff, not the fraudulent stuff, and if that is what you are speaking about, which I can't know unless you clue me in, then where does that stuff come from: What is the source of surplus wealth?
Do you understand the question?
What is the source of surplus wealth?
It is good, I think, that we have progressed from hamburgers, to information currency, and are now focusing interest on legal money. That may pay off.
I don't know.
I can't speak for you.
And as far as my insistence on "taking you literally"; what would you prefer: I should read between the lines?
The Dollar is going down, The Dollar Hegemony is going out, and what is going to replace it, will be either:
A. Better legal crime for the criminals, a "better" world reserve currency, legal crime, monopoly power, enforced by deceit, threats of violence, and many, many, many, terrible acts of violence, so as to maintain monopoly power.
B. Competitive money; and therefore higher, and higher, and higher, quality money, at lower, and lower, and lower costs, until such time as all the competitors are forced to produce, and maintain, the highest possible money, at the lowest cost.
That is a power struggle, that is not a static object, and knowing the difference between "that which is current", or currency, and that which is not current, is a significant step toward understanding the power struggle, as it exists.
I think that the time is ripe for a regime change away from legal crime, enforced with a legal money monopoly, in American, and a return to a competitive money, such as the time in America before the legal criminals retook that power from the honest productive Americans.
You can go on thinking whatever you choose. So far, from my view, your choices are not competitive
Note: The series of responses above have been removed from the original forum they were published onto.