 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
This topic was created by someone other than me. I did not create this topic. This topic was create by someone who chose to copy my responses to another topic, and then paste my responses to another topic into this topic; and a decision was made, not by me, and not with my consent, to attribute this topic to me, which is false. This is not my topic.
I can, however, see value in this topic, as a topic.
Example:
We're a large, diverse industry, and no one is in charge.
That is a short and concise description of The Internet; which remains an example of competition.
Not a "theory" of competition; as in "conspiracy theory" - The Internet is an example of a working competition.
The quote above is cut and pasted from the following link:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=global-ipv6-day-internet-test
I am going to also add my comments concerning the choice of the word "Theories" to the topic title; and again reinforce the understanding that I did not choose that topic title, and restate the fact that my name is misleadingly placed as the topic starter, which is false, I did not start this topic, and I did not choose the topic title, and I did not choose the word "Theories" to label my comments about the force of competition, which is a force, not a theory, and to me this is as important as knowing friends of liberty from foes of liberty; whereby confusing the two will transfer power from those who produce power to those who steal it, or confusing the two will empower the criminals at the expense of the victims, and that isn't a theory, that is a process that has been accurately measured, is accurately measured, and will continue to be accurately measured as that process has proceeded, is proceeding, and so long as it will proceed in that measurable way.
The idea that my comments about competition are "theories" goes along the same path as all the other deceptions whereby that which is perceived is supposedly dependent upon that capacity to perceive it; which may or may not be true in any case, and the problem concerns the supposed authority that dictates that which is fiction as if it is fact; without trial, without question, without competitive interpretation testing validity of the supposed facts that are measurably fictions.
Competition is, and competition does, and competition that is, and competition that does, is not a theory, it is what it is, and it does what it does, it is not a "Theory" no matter who claims that it is, no matter what badge the person claiming that it is holds, no matter what license the false claim is backed up with, no matter what army backs up the claim, and no matter what force is used to dictate the false claim.
Competition is not a theory, and that is not a claim of mine, I don't own the claim, my viewpoint is separate from that which competition is; while my viewpoint can be known as a competitive viewpoint that does seek to know, realize, and then communicate competition.
A.
Competition is what it is, even if no one claims as much.
B.
I can know that competition is, and I can communicate that understanding with words; and another person can claim that my knowledge of competition is "just a theory" and that I am a competition conspiracy theorist, or make any claim imaginable.
C.
Competition is a theory that is supported by competition conspiracy theorists; not something that can actually be measured, and competition is not something real; competition is a utopian fantasy, competition is a fiction, competition is an imaginary creation of someone's over active mind, something that someone with too much time on their hands will invent when bored, and competition is fancy, a choice, and competition vanishes when people stop believing in such nonsense.
There are, above, THREE, competitive "claims", or "theories", so as to illustrate, to make available for individual perceptive judgment,